ThePsychologist wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
Shit draft year.
Players will stay based on that alone.
I don't believe that. There are some very good players available and like very year there will be good players late and in the rookie draft.
If we go in with the attitude of "it's a crap draft and wait a year" it achieves nothing. Even if we go in with 6 - 8 picks and get 2-3 good players it's a start.
At this point last year, I reckon there was about 20-25 players on the radar for potential first round draft picks, by about draft week there were about 30, for one reason or another - list deficiencies, draft camp results, etc.
At this point in the year, I reckon there's probably 8, maybe 10. (not including Darcy Moore given F/S status)
Yep - fair call, there's always going to be diamonds in the rough, and we're pretty good at finding them on past history. But of all the years for us to head to the draft table in blind faith/necessity/anything is better than the shit on our list, now is not the year.
Is it really worth - for example, paying out Matthew Watson's last year, so we can bring in a speculative in an ordinary draft year?
I'd rather another year of a similar approach to this year - lets find 2 or 3 money ball prospects, clear what dead wood we can to other clubs without having to pay them out, and use our first pick on a KP player. If nothing else, it gives us a better position to judge whether to extend Malthouse's contract, and we can go back to the draft next year with hopefully a better crop available. Not like we're going to bounce straight back up any time soon.