TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=33998 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Sugarcane [ Wed May 14, 2014 9:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Author: | Clayman [ Wed May 14, 2014 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
We need a general down there who will organise the back half. Simpson is that person now however his is 30. We need a KPP general ![]() White and Rowe are only soldiers but can play a role. |
Author: | Braithy [ Wed May 14, 2014 9:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
If rowe's improvement continues, he might be. Hard to say how good he can be or where his ceiling is, but he is easily CFC's most improved player this season. I'd throw Daisy back there to be our general in the mould of simpson |
Author: | Robert Heatley [ Wed May 14, 2014 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
I think both have shown that their best is pretty good - it's the difference between best and worst and how often the best is achieved that is the issue. Having said that I've been pleasantly surprised by Rowe in the games I've seen him WB, WC and Saints |
Author: | Robert Heatley [ Wed May 14, 2014 9:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Braithy wrote: If rowe's improvement continues, he might be. Hard to say how good he can be or where his ceiling is, but he is easily CFC's most improved player this season. I'd throw Daisy back there to be our general in the mould of simpson I don't reckon you can play a bloke in defence who can only kick it 20m - Hawthorn build their game on superior kicking from defence. |
Author: | Braithy [ Wed May 14, 2014 9:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
yeah, we're not hawthorn. They have (disposal) quality all over the park. And daisy can go 40m easy and his general field kicking is elite compared to his set shot kicking. With MM's gameplan we are to chip it out and hold possession out of defense to limit getting burnt on turnovers. imo, Daisy fits that role to a T. |
Author: | Dominator_7 [ Wed May 14, 2014 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
I think its a good solution to tie us over until competent young key backs can be developed in the next few years |
Author: | Sugarcane [ Wed May 14, 2014 10:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Braithy wrote: If rowe's improvement continues, he might be. Hard to say how good he can be or where his ceiling is, but he is easily CFC's most improved player this season. I'd throw Daisy back there to be our general in the mould of simpson Don't mind that |
Author: | Sugarcane [ Wed May 14, 2014 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Dominator_7 wrote: I think its a good solution to tie us over until competent young key backs can be developed in the next few years Gee that could take 5 years |
Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Wed May 14, 2014 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
I think White can make a very good 3rd 'tall' defender. Worry will be if/when we need him to play as 1st or 2nd defender. e.g. did well on Jessie White, not sure he could handle Cloke or Reid. |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Wed May 14, 2014 12:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Would Mark Austin be getting a game in this backline? Currently can't get a game in the Dogs outfit even with Jordan Roughead out injured. Sits behind Tom Williams and Dale Morris in the pecking order despite playing some pretty good footy in the magoos. |
Author: | kingkerna [ Wed May 14, 2014 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
poll should allow more than one pick, anyway, White is Rowe isn't |
Author: | Sugarcane [ Wed May 14, 2014 12:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
kingkerna wrote: poll should allow more than one pick, anyway, White is Rowe isn't Thought I'd done that Fixed |
Author: | Big Kahuna Boot [ Wed May 14, 2014 1:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Sugarcane wrote: Dominator_7 wrote: I think its a good solution to tie us over until competent young key backs can be developed in the next few years Gee that could take 5 years ..at a minimum, unless we pay over the odds via trade or free agency.. ..don't worry, it balances out with no young key forwards.. ..happy times.. ..and rucks.... ..and possibly, prime mids.. |
Author: | Blues Clues [ Wed May 14, 2014 1:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Kevin Walsh and Mario Bortolotto played in flag teams, who knows |
Author: | Blues Clues [ Wed May 14, 2014 1:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Kevin Walsh and Mario Bortolotto played in flag teams, who knows |
Author: | dane [ Wed May 14, 2014 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Where is the "we will turn on them if they play one bad match" button? Or is that implied on TC? |
Author: | Blue Tongue [ Wed May 14, 2014 1:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
dane wrote: Where is the "we will turn on them if they play one bad match" button? Or is that implied on TC? ![]() Both playing well enough to keep two first round draft selections out of the team ![]() |
Author: | Adam Chatfield [ Wed May 14, 2014 2:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Its likely both will be delisted at seasons end. |
Author: | kingkerna [ Wed May 14, 2014 3:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Do we think Rowe and White are long term solutions? |
Adam Chatfield wrote: Its likely both will be delisted at seasons end. I think White will stay |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |