ThePsychologist wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Personally i think we will beat collingwood if Gibbs plays in the backline and we lost the third tall type we play there.
I admit Gibbs is playing better as a midfielder than i thought he could and longterm it could be better for the club to play him there continually but if we want to win against collingwood moving him to the backline is what i would do.
We have only won one game with him in the midfield this season and that was against GWS. We looked our best in games against Westcoast Adelaide (first half before Gibbs got subbed out) and Brisbane and our second half against the cats looked ok. He played back in all them games. I think this is because he stops goals and sets more up for us from the backline.
He would need to be replaced onball which at this stage is hard unless Murphy comes back and/or Bell and Carrazzo come in.
Touhy Jamo Simpson
Walker Henda Gibbs
This backline still does is for me. Gives us extra run and rotations onball so we can keep doing what we do well for longer.
At the minute i would play Yaz as a small forward and drop one of Betts or Garlett.
Lucas sub.
I think the MCG under lights this week will bring out our best and re ignite our season.
What you are really saying is even with 20 hbfer types on the list and not enough mids.. were struggling at hbf.. and Gibbs should keep playing there??
Yeah i agree....!!!.. but only because we !@#$%& up recruitment and list management...and Gibbs can play BOTH even though he is a midfielder!!!!
We are just so dumb arent we???
Pretty much.
..........and id be happy to lose a little more in the midfield if we get our attacks from behind centre. It will mean there is more space in front to use instead of going all 2010 and trying to play the game in our half .....................and not scoring due to the congestion. So we give up a bit of midfield and have an attacking dynamic backline with space infront of it. Sounds like what some of the teams at the top are doing.
True we botched up our list with too many players with HBF skillsets. I want onballers in every position but the spine. Occasionally a third tall defender but not often.
Our best ball user should be given the ball - Give the bloody thing to Zac Touhy he is the only players in the side that gets penetration on his kicks - Free him up and give him the F#*king ball FFS
Need better ball use behind and around the ball.
Yarran to HBF is a no brainer for me. Where he played his best footy and where he can add some consistency to his game.
His run from defence with Walker and Simpson would be damaging.
Tuohy is crying out for more. Throw him in the middle where his size and elite kicking will add to our rotations. If guys like Tuohy can be kicking it inside 50 4-5 times a game then we are so much more dangerous.
Yarran can't go back to HBF because opposition coaches worked out he is too easily dragged out of the game by playing their HFF at FF. Yarran then an't go near the footy because his man just propped in the goalsquare and Yarran had to stay with him. Put him on someone else and that player would go to the square. Walker had to go back because he can mark and run. Yarran can run but his marking isn't good enough for him to play at FB. So Yarran moved up field where he is more involved in the play.
Touhy I agree should play in the midfield. He runs hard, plays hard and kicks beautifully in the field and for goal and isn't frightened to have a ping. Last week inthe forst quarter, nobody wanted to take responsibility for shooting at goal and it was almost comical watching several players passing off when they were in range. Turnovers resulted and we didn't impact the scoreboard.. Time to blood Touhy in the rotations.
I'd love to think we can win this but I thought we could beat Sydney. Picking Carlton cost me top spot on the TC Tipping Comp!!!
Now THAT hurts.