Effes wrote:
AFL match report says Tapscott the only report
The umpire who reported Tapscott should be on report.
Crappest decision of the day and that is saying something
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R6: Waite (offered 1 week by MRP - see p2) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32922 |
Page 1 of 10 |
| Author: | SHHH! [ Sun May 05, 2013 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R6: Waite (offered 1 week by MRP - see p2) |
Heard it on the train. Just bloody stoopid if true!! |
|
| Author: | DenimUndies [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
SHHH! wrote: Heard it on the train. Just bloody stoopid if true!! Don't think there's much in it, but who cares, he's not a carlton player so the outcome doesn't really effect us. |
|
| Author: | Effes [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
AFL match report says Tapscott the only report |
|
| Author: | bluebeard [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Effes wrote: AFL match report says Tapscott the only report The umpire who reported Tapscott should be on report. Crappest decision of the day and that is saying something
|
|
| Author: | Blueboy_Dan [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Watching the replay now...wasn't a lot in it really, slight glance, no force in it but his bad record makes me worry |
|
| Author: | Effes [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Wenn, Leppard and Mitchell were woeful. |
|
| Author: | Stamos [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Effes wrote: AFL match report says Tapscott the only report Yep, Waite was not reported. |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Whether much in it or not... What a fking idiot. Seriously I'd drop him whether suspended or not |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
bluehammer wrote: Whether much in it or not... What a fking idiot. Seriously I'd drop him whether suspended or not leadership group 
|
|
| Author: | harker [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Synbad wrote: bluehammer wrote: Whether much in it or not... What a fking idiot. Seriously I'd drop him whether suspended or not leadership group Hilarious. Saw it coming from last week and Waite didn't disappoint. Leopard.........spots. |
|
| Author: | kingkerna [ Sun May 05, 2013 8:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
So, um, people angry with him even if he didn't get reported? How odd |
|
| Author: | Damiano [ Sun May 05, 2013 8:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Waite - reported?? |
Seriously guys??? MM knows what he's doing. Waite tonight has done more tonight than Hampson, Rowe combined! Although Hampson actually played well tonight. Can't wait to get Mitchell into this lineup (Probably for Hampson) going to be a good season In MM I trust |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Sun May 05, 2013 9:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Angry? Well yeah. Not at the way he played. That was fine, presented well, marked well and kicked a couple. Yeah I know it was a bit of a nothing headbutt but why do it? Why put yourself in that position when you've a very much justified reputation for doing stupid things to get yourself suspended? When you miss as much footy as Waite does, wouldn't you be doing whatever you could to stay out there? I'm sick of them being called brainfades. He's done dumb shit enough times now for me to believe that this is the rule rather than exception. And I'm angry because he's important! He can play, and he's precisely what we need! Stupid. Hopefully gets off. I'd give him 2 weeks for being a moron. |
|
| Author: | bluechucky [ Sun May 05, 2013 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Waite - reported?? |
kingkerna wrote: So, um, people angry with him even if he didn't get reported? How odd Can still be cited by the MRP. |
|
| Author: | kingkerna [ Sun May 05, 2013 9:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Well if he gets found guilty and suspended then bitch all you want, I'll be right beside you |
|
| Author: | Stefchook [ Mon May 06, 2013 2:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Absolutely nothing in it. |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Mon May 06, 2013 7:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Low impact, intentional contact, in play, high stupidity =2,652 activation points. 26 weeks or 23 with an early plea. |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Mon May 06, 2013 7:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
Its the little things that set up seasons.... and win you games. |
|
| Author: | chelodina [ Mon May 06, 2013 7:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waite - reported?? |
In this modern world, they use a little thing called the Match Review Panel, so it doesn't really matter if you are reported on the field or not. The Match Review Panel watch the replay of the game and can report people even after the game has concluded (equivalent to Beta Max/Super 8 for reference). If you would like more information on the video review, please click here. http://www.afl.com.au/video/featured-pr ... view-panel kingkerna wrote: So, um, people angry with him even if he didn't get reported? How odd
|
|
| Author: | sinbagger [ Mon May 06, 2013 9:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Waite - reported?? |
Damiano wrote: Seriously guys??? MM knows what he's doing. Waite tonight has done more tonight than Hampson, Rowe combined! ... In MM I trust All is forgiven, come back Fev... |
|
| Page 1 of 10 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|