TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32835
Page 1 of 22

Author:  Effes [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

NO LATE CHANGES

FINAL INTERCHANGES
Collingwood: Jordan Russell, Steele Sidebottom, Sam Dwyer
Substitute: Paul Seedsman
Carlton: Kade Simpson, Tom Bell, Marcus Davies
Substitute: Brock McLean

Author:  camel [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

GO BLUES!!!

McLean as a sub doesn't make much sense to me. Either start him or have a player that has more potential for impact and speed late in the game.

Author:  Sin City [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Glad Bell isn't the sub anyway.

Author:  GWS [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

camelboy wrote:
GO BLUES!!!

McLean as a sub doesn't make much sense to me. Either start him or have a player that has more potential for impact and speed late in the game.


Allows him to come on fresh when the pace is out of the game.

Not a bad move.

Author:  Stamos [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

camelboy wrote:
GO BLUES!!!

McLean as a sub doesn't make much sense to me. Either start him or have a player that has more potential for impact and speed late in the game.


This

Author:  Blues Clues [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

camelboy wrote:
GO BLUES!!!

McLean as a sub doesn't make much sense to me. Either start him or have a player that has more potential for impact and speed late in the game.


Makes sense to me. Brock is best late in the game when the sting has gone out of it, as he was last qtr last week.

If Brock was a racehorse you'd only back him on a wet track..

Worth noting that the more the season progressed last yr, the better he became. Just keeps chugging when other mids start to feel the pinch later in the season.

Author:  Taff [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Going to miss the first half so hope we are in a good position at half time when I turn on the television.

Go Blues!

Author:  The Normal One [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

We better turn up switched on or this will be a thumping. Not confident in our players mental application.

Author:  Sin City [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Waite said on triple M we'll tag Pendlebury and go head to head with Swan.

Author:  The Normal One [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:24 pm ]
Post subject:  R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Sin City wrote:
Waite said on triple M we'll tag Pendlebury and go head to head with Swan.


Carrots on Pendlebury in a run with role, Gibbs or Murphy head to head on Swan.

Author:  Sin City [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

King Kenny wrote:
Sin City wrote:
Waite said on triple M we'll tag Pendlebury and go head to head with Swan.


Carrots on Pendlebury in a run with role, Gibbs or Murphy head to head on Swan.

Gibbs hopefully and Murphy to run riot in his own.

Author:  grrofunger [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

i spilled tomato sauce all over my carlton top

not a good sign

Author:  JohnM [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

grrofunger wrote:
i spilled tomato sauce all over my carlton top

not a good sign


My lucky 1995 scarf had tomato sauce on it for the whole season. We'll be fine now.

Author:  Blueboy74 [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Enough crap on who we are missing, or who is going to kick the goals.

A side with Russell, Seedsman, Dwyer, Sinclair, Clarke, McCaffer, Blair, Jolly, Maxwell, Elliott, O'Brien, Toovey, Goldsack, Lynch etc shouldn't be unbeatable.

Somehow they just seem to get it done though.

Author:  jimmae [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Not 100% on McLean being the sub, especially with the defensive structure in place. Davies feels like one too many in the rotation there, even if it releases Tuohy or Yarran. I suppose it's either that or rotating Robbo & Bell through the forward line to give others a rest if they put Brock on the park.

Scotland returning will sort out this issue.

Author:  Blue Vain [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Blueboy74 wrote:
Enough crap on who we are missing, or who is going to kick the goals.

A side with Russell, Seedsman, Dwyer, Sinclair, Clarke, McCaffer, Blair, Jolly, Maxwell, Elliott, O'Brien, Toovey, Goldsack, Lynch etc shouldn't be unbeatable.

Somehow they just seem to get it done though.



Yep, they have some average players in their team.
Considering we best them twice last time, convincingly and then with a sub par team, we have no excuses.

Author:  The Normal One [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:  R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Dugan kicked 3 in the last game played, Betts 4.

Author:  BigBlueWave [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Crazy that Brock is Sub ... we are going to miss him bad through the day.

I hope and suspect Tom Bell will play well ...

Come on Bluebaggers ... dig deep.

Author:  Warby [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

I'm forever hopeful without being confident......fingers crossed....... :thumbsup:

Author:  jimmae [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R2: Collingwood v Carlton (Match discussion)

Duigan would probably concede 4 or 5 if he played this week, he's out of sorts. Betts is a loss, but a chance for Jeff to play up to his potential without hurting the forward structure.

Page 1 of 22 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/