The Match Review Panel determined that Yarran's strike on the Richmond player was of a level under that required to face a penalty.
Good News for Chris and Carlton ahead of our big game with our traditional rival Collingwood.
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Yarran cleared of striking http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32820 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | 79Vintage [ Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Yarran cleared of striking |
The Match Review Panel determined that Yarran's strike on the Richmond player was of a level under that required to face a penalty. Good News for Chris and Carlton ahead of our big game with our traditional rival Collingwood.
|
|
| Author: | kezza [ Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
So how many weeks did Vickery get for his karate kick to MCleans neck? Let me guess.....................................................................not even looked at. |
|
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
79Vintage wrote: The Match Review Panel determined that Yarran's strike on the Richmond player was of a level under that required to face a penalty. Good News for Chris and Carlton ahead of our big game with our traditional rival Collingwood. Scans came back from the Tigers player and no kidneys were found in the impact zone. |
|
| Author: | Stefchook [ Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
|
|
| Author: | JohnM [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
So they're basically saying he punches like a girl. Bit of a pyrrhic victory that one. |
|
| Author: | Blueboy_Dan [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
Good, all we need clear him of now is his complacency. |
|
| Author: | Sin City [ Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
Can't believe McLean wasn't looked at for head butting poor Vickery's foot! |
|
| Author: | emtwenty [ Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
Sin City wrote: Can't believe McLean wasn't looked at for head butting poor Vickery's foot! KB on SEN argued that Mclean intentionally ran into Vickery's foot. I switched it off. |
|
| Author: | Sin City [ Thu Apr 04, 2013 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
emtwenty wrote: Sin City wrote: Can't believe McLean wasn't looked at for head butting poor Vickery's foot! KB on SEN argued that Mclean intentionally ran into Vickery's foot. I switched it off. Yeah, I reckon Vickery involuntarily lifts his foot to that exact height every time he takes an uncontested mark...... And let's be truthful, if Brock was deliberately trying to line that foot up to run into it, the ball would've been sailing through the posts by the time he got there with the speed he moves at.  KB's outdone himself here. |
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Thu Apr 04, 2013 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
emtwenty wrote: Sin City wrote: Can't believe McLean wasn't looked at for head butting poor Vickery's foot! KB on SEN argued that Mclean intentionally ran into Vickery's foot. I switched it off. Bartlett is about as accurate as the room full of monkeys with typewriters - give him 1,000,000,000 years and he might (just might) inadvertently write some Shakespeare. 
|
|
| Author: | Megaman [ Thu Apr 04, 2013 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yarran cleared of striking |
emtwenty wrote: Sin City wrote: Can't believe McLean wasn't looked at for head butting poor Vickery's foot! KB on SEN argued that Mclean intentionally ran into Vickery's foot. I switched it off. The guy is a clown, trolling for reaction to his shitty show |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|