verbs wrote:
9min 44sec
Pfft, I do 2km in that time. What an amateur
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time trial http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32636 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | jubed [ Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time trial |
http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/2013-01-16/ed-breaks-bears-record Quote: Not that the 30-game midfielder is getting ahead of himself. As he said: "Adrian has got a Premiership Medallion in front of me, so I really need to worry about my footy Good to read his head is in the right space |
|
| Author: | The Normal One [ Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time trial |
jubed wrote: http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/2013-01-16/ed-breaks-bears-record Quote: Not that the 30-game midfielder is getting ahead of himself. As he said: "Adrian has got a Premiership Medallion in front of me, so I really need to worry about my footy Good to read his hair is in space EFA |
|
| Author: | JohnM [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
So what time did he run? |
|
| Author: | kingkerna [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
yeah that's a pretty good question |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
9min 44sec |
|
| Author: | DoublebluMots2 [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
So does this pose questions about modern training techniques or illustrates Gleeson was an elite runner? |
|
| Author: | The Normal One [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time trial |
verbs wrote: 9min 44sec Pfft, I do 2km in that time. What an amateur
|
|
| Author: | JohnM [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
verbs wrote: 9min 44sec Just a touch over 3min kays. That's pretty bloody good running for a guy who has to carry the bulk of a footballer, and also train for explosive strength. If they ever restrict the number of interchanges, his value would go up quite a bit. Now, just wondering if PP is exactly 3.2km or not... |
|
| Author: | JohnM [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
DoublebluMots2 wrote: So does this pose questions about modern training techniques or illustrates Gleeson was an elite runner? There haven't been any significant advances in training techniques for middle and long distance running since Gleeson's time. To my mind, it suggests that Gleeson did a lot of training on his own to reach those levels of fitness back in the 80's. |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
I'm amazed that Braddles didn't hold the record. Best running machine I've seen. |
|
| Author: | Heavs [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
I'm amazed a thread about Gleeson hasn't been hijacked yet. |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
Bell came second @ 10min 20sec |
|
| Author: | baz_baz [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
verbs wrote: Bell came second @ 10min 20sec Thanks for the Info Verbs....do you know what time Fraser ran?.........or any other good performers? |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
baz_baz wrote: verbs wrote: Bell came second @ 10min 20sec Thanks for the Info Verbs....do you know what time Fraser ran?.........or any other good performers? No. Read those two times on the Courier-Mail website and they were the only two mentioned. Both were PBs too. |
|
| Author: | GWS [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
Kouta wrote: I'm amazed that Braddles didn't hold the record. Best running machine I've seen. Braddles trained on his own until they upped his pay. |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
GWS wrote: Kouta wrote: I'm amazed that Braddles didn't hold the record. Best running machine I've seen. Braddles trained on his own until they upped his pay. as captain,,,,, |
|
| Author: | Hornet [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 9:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
Now that he's mastered running... we must teach him to kick and handball |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
Hornet wrote: Now that he's mastered running... we must teach him to kick and handball Probably needs to master his running patterns, and the skills will improve. Numerous times last year he ran himself to near exhaustion during games, indicating since he's the fittest at the club he's doing some unnecessary running. |
|
| Author: | club29 [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
I only saw him run from contest to contest and contesting. He looked stuffed at times. I'd say he got to more contests than anyone on our list and that was what was getting him a game. Although not hopeless at contesting I he can have more affect on the contests he gets too this year. |
|
| Author: | harker [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ed Curnow beats Adrian Gleeson's 3.2-kilometre time tria |
club29 wrote: I only saw him run from contest to contest and contesting. He looked stuffed at times. I'd say he got to more contests than anyone on our list and that was what was getting him a game. Although not hopeless at contesting I he can have more affect on the contests he gets too this year. McLean does pretty well at covering the ground also but knows where to find space when required and is currently a somewhat better user of the ball Curnow is a very competitive beast that doesn't like coming second even to his now ex-skipper in Judd, regularly out-sprinting him. Found out in the skill department on many occasions last year, but I'd imagine Curnow gave himself a pretty tough summer trying to improve. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|