Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 6:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6311
Lots of talk about coaching at this club but its worth looking at the recruiting over the last 6 years. Now we all know that all clubs are going to have hits and misses. The key is having more hits than misses.
Our recruiting has been more disastrous than Ratten's coaching. Here is the evidence.

I will start with the ruckman situation. Big blokes take time. Unless you are a freak like Nic Nat you are unwise to select a ruckman with a number one pick. Kreuzer is a plodder. He is the new Fraser. Meanwhile Sam Jacobs has become possibly the best tap ruckman in Australia. We had him. We saw his development. We saw him tear the Swans apart in that final. And he went back to SA when we got Warnock. More on that later. Face it folks we have [REDACTED] up severely here. We cant play Hampson Kreuzer and Warnock in the one team. All 3 are pure ruckman, not very good at it and we gave up so much to get them. Picks 1,17 and 24. Sheer bloody lunacy. Instead of picking these 3 blokes we could have gone with these 3 alternatives. Ruckman can be found in the WAFL, SANFL, VFL in their ealy 20s
Kreuzer(Cotchin)
Hampson(Tippett)
Warnock( Beames)

Shocking mistake here

The trades
Example 1
Warnock deal. Defies logic. Why get him when we had Jacobs. And with pick 24 we could have Beames, Hanneberry, Redden, Shiels or Broadbent. If Warnock was a gun I would understand it. He had shown @#$%&! all at the Dockers.
Example 2
The McLean deal. Yes Brock has finally strung a few together, but he has to do a lot more to make this trade a success. With pick 11 we had a plethora of talent that was under our recruiter's noses to choose from
Menzel
Sam Reid
Mitch Duncan
Fyfe
Bastinac
@#$%&! me dead. What was Ratts thinking here.

Example 3
The Judd deal
Worst one of the lot.
Instead of Judd and Armfield we could have
Dangerfield and Scott Selwood
And of course Josh kennedy who became more of a loss with Fevola going. Henderson looks more a defender to me so we basically havent had a power forward for 3 years.

Dumb Dumb Dumb

And there is more
These guys could be wearing the navy blue in brackets and the guys we ended up with were
Hampson (Tippett)
Mark Austin (David McKay)
Steven Browne (Scott Thompson NM)
Gibbs ( Selwood)
Chris Johnston ( Tom Rockliff) :roll:
Pfeiffer (Suckling) :screwy: :screwy:

On top of this Grigg is a better player than Collins

We have found some good players in the rookie draft but at the top end we have stuffed up big time

It comes back to the quick fix solution. The Judd and McLean deal is a classic example. Our ability to recognise talent at the high end of the draft is severely questionable.
Gibbs and Kreuzer have been disappointments to me compared to what we could have got.

Before Ratten is sacked I would sack all the recruiting staff and start again.
Its been a great comedy over the last 6 years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:30 am
Posts: 475
Location: Glenelg
Well said. :clap:

_________________
"He was found guilty in June 2008 of assault with intent to cause bodily harm, an offence which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years jail."
And people are making his return to footy somewhat of a fairytale?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7248
Hindsight has 20/20 vision I'm told...

Yeah, that list looks bad but I'm certain every club has a similar list.

Player development is a big issue for us regardless of who we select(ed)

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Sakc...errr...demote Hughes!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
Interesting all the players we could have had aren't all at the same club....

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:40 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Stuff Hindsight. Lets get some forsight. I'm not asking for a sacking. Our recruiting manager has already been changed anyway. What we need is a different way of looking at things. Too much second quessing and half baked planing. Things have got to get much better.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
For me:

Don't draft ruckman with early picks, and

use the draft for kids NOT mature aged players.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
yibbida wrote:
Interesting all the players we could have had aren't all at the same club....


Not every club has had the same chances.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21069
Location: Missing Kouta
:garthp:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
ThePsychologist wrote:
For me:

Don't draft ruckman with early picks, and

use the draft for kids NOT mature aged players.


I'm not sure if I'd follow your ruckmen theory on every occasion but I'd also add honer the depth of the draft to any list. Too many drafts with too few picks.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:23 pm
Posts: 506
Image

[youtube]9rmUZQrvF5o[/youtube]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Kouta wrote:
:garthp:


He's (?) been let loose. We are in a hole and kouta is going to smirk us all out of it. :screwy:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Last edited by Pafloyul on Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:51 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Anencephalic wrote:
Image

[youtube]9rmUZQrvF5o[/youtube]


Been done, bad then, bad now.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:53 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 327
hindsight is a beautiful thing, only rules i would say would be take a gun midfielder over a ruckman any day of the week and never ever waste a pick on an older player u can rookie. i hate these threads


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:01 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:23 pm
Posts: 506
Pafloyul wrote:
Anencephalic wrote:
Image

[youtube]9rmUZQrvF5o[/youtube]


Been done, bad then, bad now.


Apologies was tossing up between that and these:

Image Image

Should have just given this link

http://hindsight.usegrid.net/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6311
blueboys101 wrote:
hindsight is a beautiful thing, only rules i would say would be take a gun midfielder over a ruckman any day of the week and never ever waste a pick on an older player u can rookie. i hate these threads

Hindsight yes I hear you
What the trades highlights is the clubs rush to be successfull. You cant do it these days that way. The club hasnt learnt. Quick fix is dead and buried.

And As I said Kreuzer and Gibbs have been disappointments. Just average footballers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
keogh wrote:
blueboys101 wrote:
hindsight is a beautiful thing, only rules i would say would be take a gun midfielder over a ruckman any day of the week and never ever waste a pick on an older player u can rookie. i hate these threads

Hindsight yes I hear you
What the trades highlights is the clubs rush to be successfull. You cant do it these days that way. The club hasnt learnt. Quick fix is dead and buried.

And As I said Kreuzer and Gibbs have been disappointments. Just average footballers.



So your not a fan of the cloke deal then?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6311
redback wrote:
keogh wrote:
blueboys101 wrote:
hindsight is a beautiful thing, only rules i would say would be take a gun midfielder over a ruckman any day of the week and never ever waste a pick on an older player u can rookie. i hate these threads

Hindsight yes I hear you
What the trades highlights is the clubs rush to be successfull. You cant do it these days that way. The club hasnt learnt. Quick fix is dead and buried.

And As I said Kreuzer and Gibbs have been disappointments. Just average footballers.



So your not a fan of the cloke deal then?

No
and I am not a fan in handing Malthouse the job

I will say it again
the Quick Fix doesnt work in AFL 99% of the time.
We do it too often
Thats why we wont be playing finals 5 seasons into Judd's presence at the club


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
Agree both counts :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
keogh wrote:
Lots of talk about coaching at this club but its worth looking at the recruiting over the last 6 years. Now we all know that all clubs are going to have hits and misses. The key is having more hits than misses.
Our recruiting has been more disastrous than Ratten's coaching. Here is the evidence.

I will start with the ruckman situation. Big blokes take time. Unless you are a freak like Nic Nat you are unwise to select a ruckman with a number one pick. Kreuzer is a plodder. He is the new Fraser. Meanwhile Sam Jacobs has become possibly the best tap ruckman in Australia. We had him. We saw his development. We saw him tear the Swans apart in that final. And he went back to SA when we got Warnock. More on that later. Face it folks we have !@#$%& up severely here. We cant play Hampson Kreuzer and Warnock in the one team. All 3 are pure ruckman, not very good at it and we gave up so much to get them. Picks 1,17 and 24. Sheer bloody lunacy. Instead of picking these 3 blokes we could have gone with these 3 alternatives. Ruckman can be found in the WAFL, SANFL, VFL in their ealy 20s
Kreuzer(Cotchin)
Hampson(Tippett)
Warnock( Beames)

Shocking mistake here

The trades
Example 1
Warnock deal. Defies logic. Why get him when we had Jacobs. And with pick 24 we could have Beames, Hanneberry, Redden, Shiels or Broadbent. If Warnock was a gun I would understand it. He had shown !@#$%& all at the Dockers.
Example 2
The McLean deal. Yes Brock has finally strung a few together, but he has to do a lot more to make this trade a success. With pick 11 we had a plethora of talent that was under our recruiter's noses to choose from
Menzel
Sam Reid
Mitch Duncan
Fyfe
Bastinac
!@#$%& me dead. What was Ratts thinking here.

Example 3
The Judd deal
Worst one of the lot.
Instead of Judd and Armfield we could have
Dangerfield and Scott Selwood
And of course Josh kennedy who became more of a loss with Fevola going. Henderson looks more a defender to me so we basically havent had a power forward for 3 years.

Dumb Dumb Dumb

And there is more
These guys could be wearing the navy blue in brackets and the guys we ended up with were
Hampson (Tippett)
Mark Austin (David McKay)
Steven Browne (Scott Thompson NM)
Gibbs ( Selwood)
Chris Johnston ( Tom Rockliff) :roll:
Pfeiffer (Suckling) :screwy: :screwy:

On top of this Grigg is a better player than Collins

We have found some good players in the rookie draft but at the top end we have stuffed up big time

It comes back to the quick fix solution. The Judd and McLean deal is a classic example. Our ability to recognise talent at the high end of the draft is severely questionable.
Gibbs and Kreuzer have been disappointments to me compared to what we could have got.

Before Ratten is sacked I would sack all the recruiting staff and start again.
Its been a great comedy over the last 6 years



So u didn't want Judd when we got him....hmmmm


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group