| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Judd fightback http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32026 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | kkk [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Judd fightback |
We all know Essington supporters are going to boo Judd incessantly on Saturday. We can't take this lying down. There are several of their players who deserve the same treatment and I propose we pick one and give it to him unmercilessly. If the object of our derision happens to get the ball earlier than Chris so much the better. My options would be - Lonergan, who certainly deserves it for his disgraceful attack on Carrots last time. Only problem is that he hardly gets the ball. Fletcher, who has committed a litany of slimy low-life offences over his career (those old enough to remember will attest that this is a case of like-father like-son). Problem is he has reached the stage where his age and longevity provide hime some sort of protection from scrutiny. Hurley. Ha-ha, now we may be on to something. If questioned by some red and black neandarthal we need only reply that our brother, mother-in-law, best mate, next door neighbour or parole officer is a taxi-driver. What do you think? |
|
| Author: | Cazzesman [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
kkk wrote: We all know Essington supporters are going to boo Judd incessantly on Saturday. We can't take this lying down. There are several of their players who deserve the same treatment and I propose we pick one and give it to him unmercilessly. If the object of our derision happens to get the ball earlier than Chris so much the better. My options would be - Lonergan, who certainly deserves it for his disgraceful attack on Carrots last time. Only problem is that he hardly gets the ball. Fletcher, who has committed a litany of slimy low-life offences over his career (those old enough to remember will attest that this is a case of like-father like-son). Problem is he has reached the stage where his age and longevity provide hime some sort of protection from scrutiny. Hurley. Ha-ha, now we may be on to something. If questioned by some red and black neandarthal we need only reply that our brother, mother-in-law, best mate, next door neighbour or parole officer is a taxi-driver. What do you think? I think you're a big boy and can probably do anything you like from the safety of your seat on the other side of the fence after 20 beers. Regards Cazzesman |
|
| Author: | BigKev [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Ha -- nice to see someone getting fired up early triple k.  Problem with pre-deciding animosity towards an Essendon* player is that there's just too many suitable candidates!! My advice is to go there with an open mind. I expect that before you get to the half way mark of the first quarter you'll have found someone that deserves a baking. And then all the Carlton people will be on the same page. |
|
| Author: | Teddy Hopkins [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Cazz its all in the fun of the game. With your sense of humour you should be sipping a latte behind a glass screen watching the demons getting thrashed every week. Personally I would go for Watson. As one of the nice boys of the game he wouldn't know what was going on and it might actually throw him off. |
|
| Author: | club29 [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
I boo Hurley for beating up that innocent man everytime we play them. In this case i think we should also cheer everytime Judd gets it to balance it out. Hopefully the boos Judd gets has the same effect on him that booing had on Greg Williams. He loved it. |
|
| Author: | CK95 [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
kkk wrote: I propose we pick one and give it to him unmercilessly. Soft 
|
|
| Author: | CK95 [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Whenever we play the Pies & they boo Judd it brings back memories of the Williams years. I love it. I don’t think Judd would give a stuff if he’s boo-ed or not. |
|
| Author: | Cazzesman [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Teddy Hopkins wrote: Cazz its all in the fun of the game. With your sense of humour you should be sipping a latte behind a glass screen watching the demons getting thrashed every week. Personally I would go for Watson. As one of the nice boys of the game he wouldn't know what was going on and it might actually throw him off. My sense of humor goes with my glass half full attitude. I would rather point out to the opposition how well our players a traveling rather than denigrating theirs. When Juddy is tearing it up let them know. I would rather tell them that Walks took a great hanger rather than suggesting Carlisle makes a great step ladder. Many, many years ago I remember watching a Reserves game at Visy (pre Preston merger) in which Doggy Brown was playing, having come back from injury. There were about about 20 people at the game and 2 opposition supporters (20-25yrd old) were on the wing seated below me. Right from the 1st bounce they were into Brown. Abused him with words a sailor wouldn't consider. The 2 of them thought it was hilarious fun and they called him and his mum for everything under the sun. With so few around their voices carried all over the ground and every word could be heard clear as a bell. Browny took it all and then when the siren went he wandered over to them and politely asked if they wanted to discuss his 'character, footballing abilities and family' on his side of the fence. The 2 of them acted like 2 years and almost cried, telling him they were just kidding and it was all meant in good nature. Browny walked off and when he was 100 metres away they 'manned up' and had another few words at him before running off like frighten children. Yep........It's all in good fun until someone starts to cry. It's all in good nature until someone takes offense. And as often happens, one supporters fun and banter is anothers racial abuse. That's my take. Regards Cazzesman |
|
| Author: | Captain Dan [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Our fans should take every opportunity to get stuck right into mega-head Lonergan. He's a c*** that deserves nothing less. |
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Cazzesman wrote: That's my take. Regards Cazzesman Who would have ever thought ...... Cazzesman =  
|
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
But having said all that - the last time Juddy got a significant break from the game courtesy of the umpires he proceeded to bag 5 x 3 Brownlow Medal votes in a row - and had "The Spew" gagging on his Crown Lagers. If he plays to a level for the next 3 weeks that not even John Russo  could ignore then 3 x 3 Brownlow Medal votes will be all the fightback I would like to see. 
|
|
| Author: | Cazzesman [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
AGRO wrote: Cazzesman wrote: That's my take. Regards Cazzesman Who would have ever thought ...... Cazzesman =  Just like Kiss unmasked, I guess it is a bit of a let down  Regards Cazzesman |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
I don't give a f&^%%k what Essendon* supporters will do. Judd will play well no matter what. Essendon* don't have anyone fit to tie his shoelaces. As for saying Cazz is KB. That is a massive insult. The biggest waste of space in the media and a joke on the rules committee. |
|
| Author: | dane [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Bit harsh on KB there. I can name 10 worse in the media off the top of my head. |
|
| Author: | CK95 [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
I think he was referring to Cazz...
|
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
dane wrote: Bit harsh on KB there. I can name 10 worse in the media off the top of my head. Not in my opinion. No idea and all he does is argue and disagree. Well past his use by date. |
|
| Author: | muzza [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
ThePsychologist wrote: dane wrote: Bit harsh on KB there. I can name 10 worse in the media off the top of my head. Not in my opinion. No idea and all he does is argue and disagree. Well past his use by date. KB or Cazz
|
|
| Author: | Cazzesman [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
muzza wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: dane wrote: Bit harsh on KB there. I can name 10 worse in the media off the top of my head. Not in my opinion. No idea and all he does is argue and disagree. Well past his use by date. KB or Cazz I'll go with answer D) All of the above. Regards Cazzesman |
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Booing must be directed at Lonergan - surely. |
|
| Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Judd fightback |
Isn't 'unmercilessly' similar to 'irregardless'? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|