Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:21 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
We all know Hampson held down FF for us a bit this season, and times he looked good and other times completely out of his depth. In essence, an athletic ruckman who the coaches were trying to turn into a forward...but in my view, he's just a ruckman who can rest in short stints forward and it will not work out as they'd planned. It's also been said ad-nauseum that ruckmen don't always translate into world-beater forwards.

How have you seen the forward line since Hampson went down with his unfortunate injury? Is there a place for him up forward next season, considering Rowe will be on the comeback, Casboult continues to improve, Mitchell given big wraps by many and, touch wood, if Waite can stay on the park?

I'm not so sure there will be. Yes we need to be patient with him and it can pay off handsomely...but looking at the other options, particularly Casboult who has been given his opportunity and done well so far (hope it continues), it may see him back in the ruck in 2013.

Thoughts?

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1191
I think we'll still rest a ruckman up forward, but not as a key forward. Casbault has done well, but we're still a little short at times. Having hammer and Kreuzer resting down there will be hugley beneficial.

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10077
I've always been of the philosophy that 3 big men can work as long as they are mobile & 2 are geniune KP forwards.
For mine a forward line of say Waite, Casboult & Hampson/Kruezer would work.
We can have the rock at ff with Waite & Hampson the mobile forwards playing further up.
Imagine if we had a Henderson & Jamison with Laidler down back in the one team as well!!!!!
Not bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..rucks can be dangerous as tall fwds yes.. ..either resting, or pushing fwd when on ball.. ..but they're not automatically key fwds just by being tall.. ..i think Hendo is our best CHF prospect, i reckon Levi is very raw but shows good signs, like him as a deep FF type.. ..Waite works best as a tall flanker..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:31 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
With our current forward structure it doesn't matter who's in the fwd 50 cuz nine times outta ten its going to Eddie....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:54 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
We have the players, its how we use it, structure up and bring the ball in.

With players such as Henderson, Waite, Walker, Hampson, Kruezer, Thornton, Betts, Garlett, Casboult, Mitchell, Rowe (plus Mids rotating through) all as options we should be able to set up several different ways dependant upon opposition/conditions/and state of the game.

I still believe the talent is there. :thumbsup:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:13 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
ThePsychologist wrote:
We have the players, its how we use it, structure up and bring the ball in.

With players such as Henderson, Waite, Walker, Hampson, Kruezer, Thornton, Betts, Garlett, Casboult, Mitchell, Rowe (plus Mids rotating through) all as options we should be able to set up several different ways dependant upon opposition/conditions/and state of the game.

I still believe the talent is there. :thumbsup:



So do I!!!!

However I don't think we know or at least fully understand how to use that talent.

Betts has been playing as a CHF
Jeff has been pushed up the ground into the midfield
Hendereson - is he a CHF or CHB?
Walker - Wing / Mid / FF???

Kreuzer / Hampson & Warnock - Do we play one of them or all at once? sometimes in the forward?


Personally I think last year worked best with Walker playing as a forward in the pocket (56 goals) Jeff and Eddie roaming the crumbs (98 goals between them).

Kreuzer has been pretty good coming back from the knee averaging 20+ hit outs per game so i think we all aggree we should leave him there.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:18 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
IMO you should only ever play one ruckman in a game with back up from a Casboult type.

The reason is that the extra rotation through the midfield is absolutely vital these days and if we go to a 2 + 2 bench it will mean even more.

Guys like Kruezer, Hampson can "pinch hit" some times up forward and snag a goal and catch oppositions off guard but should NEVER be used as a permanent option.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23865
How does all this work when we supposedly have Cloke coming in as well?

Does it mean we'd trade Hampson or Warnock?

If not, how does it affect Hampson, and his team role?

Does it mean that Rowe,Mitchell & Bolt won't get as much field development time?

Is it purely being done to try and grab a flag in the next 2 years? (If it is happening)

Could we win a flag in that time frame anyway?

Could that money be better spent?

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:41 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
The worst thing we could do is get Cloke. Personally I think he is going to Richmond.

Given SR's comments I cant see it happening. Thank Goodness.

Rather use the money on Boak & Toy and recruit some more gun kids. :thumbsup:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:52 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 4581
Location: St Helens
ThePsychologist wrote:
IMO you should only ever play one ruckman in a game with back up from a Casboult type.

The reason is that the extra rotation through the midfield is absolutely vital these days and if we go to a 2 + 2 bench it will mean even more.

Guys like Kruezer, Hampson can "pinch hit" some times up forward and snag a goal and catch oppositions off guard but should NEVER be used as a permanent option.

Completely agree with all of this :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:55 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 283
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
With our current forward structure it doesn't matter who's in the fwd 50 cuz nine times outta ten its going to Eddie....



Just a few short weeks we were saying that 9/10 times it would go to the oppositions spare defender, so at least something has improved with our forward structure. It has a very 2011 look about it now, Waite is the difference.

Snow Waite and the 2 "Dwarves" (Eddie and Jeff?)? Hi Ho?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:18 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
I really like what Casboult brings to the team. I've liked him since his VFL days especially last season.

I think he could well be the answer. For a guy who has played less than 5 AFL games I reckon he is looking alright!

I hope that he has a strong career. It'll be interesting when we have him, Mitchell and Watson all available/playing at the same time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 8940
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
With our current forward structure it doesn't matter who's in the fwd 50 cuz nine times outta ten its going to Eddie....


Do you think we get good results out of going to eddie? I am interested to hear. I know it is unconventional but i see it as quite effective and not deserved of the negative feedback the tactic gets.

He is very rarely outmarked or rebounded against . He takes inside fifty marks, makes good position, doesnt lose his feet, recovers quickly, chases and harrasses , and kicks accurately at goal.

It is infact a high % play. With Armfield, Walker and Garlett all about we are not really losing from it. Not saying we dont need a tall or two in the arc but kicking the eddie is fine by me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Laurie Nash was a 5' 8" CHF

Asked who was the greatest footballer of all time he used to say I see him in the mirror every morning

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2588
ThePsychologist wrote:
We have the players, its how we use it, structure up and bring the ball in.

With players such as Henderson, Waite, Walker, Hampson, Kruezer, Thornton, Betts, Garlett, Casboult, Mitchell, Rowe (plus Mids rotating through) all as options we should be able to set up several different ways dependant upon opposition/conditions/and state of the game.

I still believe the talent is there. :thumbsup:


Spot on Psych.
With Henderson leading then we have Kreuzer, Mitchell and Casboult we have enough talls that have shown some form and could hold down another possie.
Then we have Waite and Hampson. One is our best KP the other full of potential and also a ruck.
How do you balance the lot without losing the future, still develop and also go for the flag?
Unfortunately for Rowe I think he might have missed his chance ( Just guessing ) and I think that Thornton will be gone at the end of the year.
If Waite can stay fit and healthy for most of the year and Casboult and Mitchell also stay healthy and with a full preseason our main problem will be the our kicking for goal.
By that time I hope these players straighten us up and we have a more logical entry into the forward line.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
ThePsychologist wrote:
IMO you should only ever play one ruckman in a game with back up from a Casboult type.

The reason is that the extra rotation through the midfield is absolutely vital these days and if we go to a 2 + 2 bench it will mean even more.

Guys like Kruezer, Hampson can "pinch hit" some times up forward and snag a goal and catch oppositions off guard but should NEVER be used as a permanent option.


+1.

People see the obvious - such as a good mark or a goal from the second or, (gasp), third ruckmen. What isn't so obvious, but is actually more significant, is how much less rest our runners get by having to share the load between fewer players. Less rest ultimately leads to less Carlton players at the contest.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
club29 wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
With our current forward structure it doesn't matter who's in the fwd 50 cuz nine times outta ten its going to Eddie....


Do you think we get good results out of going to eddie? I am interested to hear. I know it is unconventional but i see it as quite effective and not deserved of the negative feedback the tactic gets.

He is very rarely outmarked or rebounded against . He takes inside fifty marks, makes good position, doesnt lose his feet, recovers quickly, chases and harrasses , and kicks accurately at goal.

It is infact a high % play. With Armfield, Walker and Garlett all about we are not really losing from it. Not saying we dont need a tall or two in the arc but kicking the eddie is fine by me.


..with a bit of time and space, betts is an excellent midget key fwd.. ..but when the fwd line gets congested [or the opposition's spare loiters], you usually need a genuine key fwd to be the high bomb target.. ..eddie is dangerous cosw he can play as a key fwd target, or a crumber,, and so he's hard to get the match-up right against..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:08 pm
Posts: 21
ThePsychologist wrote:
The worst thing we could do is get Cloke. Personally I think he is going to Richmond.

Given SR's comments I cant see it happening. Thank Goodness.

Rather use the money on Boak & Toy and recruit some more gun kids. :thumbsup:



Forget about recruiting any gun kids - if we grab Boak and Toy we will have to trade for them and won't have a pick until the 4th round!

If we grab Cloke, we will still have picks 10, 30 and 48 (approx) to land some quality young talent and as another poster mentioned, we may trade a ruckman giving us a further top 30 pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
IMO Henderson is our best key forward. Unfortunately he is also our best key defender. I am always of the opinion that a forward is harder to find than a defender. If you have a NATURAL forward play him there.

Henderson just knows what to do and where to go. He brings others into play by running to the right spaces and makes the ball come to him on the lead.

HF: Robinson/Collins Henderson/Thornton Armfield/Yarran
F: Betts/Garlett Casboult/Mitchell Waite/Walker

Plus Kruezer Hampson Duigan White Dale Buckley Ellard plus mids.


If we can't develop a potent forward line out of this we do have problems!

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluedog, Google Adsense [Bot], jezzarules, jim, Jono182, Lucky, Megaman and 325 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group