TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Ratten's take on the game
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31700
Page 1 of 3

Author:  mikkey [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Ratten's take on the game

Just received Ratt's weekly "analysis" off the game for members. I don't think it will calm any concerns members have.

Quote:
Dear Xxxxxxx

Having jetted back into Melbourne early on Sunday morning and taken a little time to gather my thoughts, I've identified a number of deficiencies which set the tone for our bitterly disappointing display against Port Power at AAMI Stadium on Saturday evening.

The die was cast early on in the piece with a series of undisciplined acts involving our players. Two 50-metre penalties, together with a quick reversal arising from an incident involving Shaun Hampson, set us back at a time when we were very much in the contest.

The second quarter came along and in the adverse weather conditions the opposition players simply adjusted better. It was also through this crucial period that they raised their intensity at the ball and the ball carrier, so much so that over the course of the first six or seven minutes we had something like 14 kicks and 18 handballs - which best reflected our overuse of the footy and our inability to make up any territory.

The Port players conducted themselves particularly well here. They outplayed us in midfield and generally surged forward with greater momentum, which in those wet and slippery circumstances gave them that crucial scoreboard ascendancy.

To top it all off, we fell away at the back end of the game. Some of the goals we conceded late in proceedings were extremely deflating and typified the type of night we had. In short, we got gun-shy with our ball movement and we turned the footy over whenever we tried to switch the play. That really hurt us too.

Josh Bootsma followed on with his good form of last week, while Matthew Watson was a fairly serviceable performer in his development, considering the opposition accumulated 61 'inside 50s'.

But with only a six day turnaround, there is no time to dwell. Our energies are now focused on rectifying our deficiencies and getting the four points against Geelong.

Kind Regards]

Author:  ryan2000 [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Meh.

Whatever!

Author:  j.scarponi [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Trying to switch play and not being able to kick the ball long to a contest due to lack of tall forwards/targets killed us.I mis counted howmany times our boys just didnt have anyone to kick to in the forward line and ended up turning it over.. it was farcical.

Author:  Stone Free [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Kick more goals, win the game. There is no other 'magic stat'.

Author:  Juddy&theKruezers [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Will make a great Journo one day....

Author:  Anencephalic [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Well name a side that plays well without it's top two defenders (Henderson, Laidler), best ruckman (Kruez), two of its top midfielders (Murph and Carrots) and its number one lead up forward target (Waite)...

Pretty much Carlton's turning point in the season was when Carrots left the field against Essedon. We miss that ball magnet immensely.

Key is to get as much contested marking, ball winning drills in to breech the gap.

Author:  grrofunger [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

bloody shaun hampson !!

Author:  j.scarponi [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Shaun tried but he has been training as a key forward for maybe 2-3 years....most teams have three tall forwards asking abit much of Hammer to take 3 tall defenders on himself and present down both wings himself and play full forward and half forward, surely you jest!

Author:  grrofunger [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

whoosh !

Author:  cimm1979 [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Phew!, thank god for that.

For a moment there I thought we were in trouble against the Cats.

But Ratt's is on it. No need for the Big Blue Wave Worry Room this week.

4 points, yeah. Bring it Cats, WCE, Hawks and Pies we are ready.

Author:  blues8182 [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Anencephalic wrote:
Well name a side that plays well without it's top two defenders (Henderson, Laidler), best ruckman (Kruez), two of its top midfielders (Murph and Carrots) and its number one lead up forward target (Waite)...

Pretty much Carlton's turning point in the season was when Carrots left the field against Essedon. We miss that ball magnet immensely.

Key is to get as much contested marking, ball winning drills in to breech the gap.


Yep I don't think any of us realised how important Carrots is to the team, I thought blokes like Curnow had a go but are just not up to it and we do look small compared to most other sides

Author:  Bookie [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Comparing this to his post-Essendon debacle memo, I think Ratts and the MC have had their "Oh 5hit" moment.
This aint a temporary thing, our jig is well and truly up, and now it's just time till the angry mob turn up, no amount of look at young Joshy Bootsma can extinguish the torches of the water cooler experts.

Author:  mikkey [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

We used to have a couple of Board members on TC. Assume that's not the case anymore? The Club really needs to get out there and communicate with the members. Tell us why things are going wrong and what you are doing about it!

Author:  Blues Clues [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Happened to hear Gerard Whateley on 3LO this morning. What he said about us summed it up perfectly, i.e. we don't have a proper "system" that allows new players to slot in and be effective, unlike other clubs who have had injuries this year but still seem to get results, i.e. Eagles, Pies, Bombers etc. This indicates that its just not TC'ers who have picked up on this.

He also said that we rely too much on the "razzle dazzle individual brilliance" to get us up. Read - we lack a game plan that the group believes in.

Hope Ratts and Co were listening..

Author:  MPH78 [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Blues Clues wrote:
Happened to hear Gerard Whateley on 3LO this morning. What he said about us summed it up perfectly, i.e. we don't have a proper "system" that allows new players to slot in and be effective, unlike other clubs who have had injuries this year but still seem to get results, i.e. Eagles, Pies, Bombers etc. This indicates that its just not TC'ers who have picked up on this.

He also said that we rely too much on the "razzle dazzle individual brilliance" to get us up. Read - we lack a game plan that the group believes in.

Hope Ratts and Co were listening..


He is spot on IMHO. Judging by the Gavin brown article this morning, we are still clueless.

Author:  woof [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

Anencephalic wrote:
Well name a side that plays well without it's top two defenders (Henderson, Laidler), best ruckman (Kruez), two of its top midfielders (Murph and Carrots) and its number one lead up forward target (Waite)...

Pretty much Carlton's turning point in the season was when Carrots left the field against Essedon. We miss that ball magnet immensely.

Key is to get as much contested marking, ball winning drills in to breech the gap.


Collingwood v Adelaide at AAMI 2 weeks ago

No Reid, Tarrant or Brown, lose Keefe in the 3rd quarter

No Swan or Ball

Cloke and Dawes don't touch the ball for the game.

They still win against a side that had lost 1 game for the season.

Author:  grrofunger [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

of course he is bloody spot on

doesnt take a rocket scientist to see it

its been evident for ages

Author:  redskins [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

No mention of why Simpson tagged Pearce, when Armfield is perfectly suited to that
No mention of Paul Bower starting in the forward line
No mention of why we were struggling for hard balls and Mitch Robinson was sent to full-forward (or the Graveyard in our 50 metre arc)
No mention of why Gibbs was on Justin Westhoff and not being pushed up to at least HBF...
No mention of why AW has become a very selfish player and shoots for goal at every opportunity (al Adel Taraabt from QPR for all those soccer fans)

Youre right Ratts, its the 2 50metre penalties that cost us....

Author:  grrofunger [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

and shaun hampson dont forget the incident involving shaun hampson

Author:  cimm1979 [ Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ratten's take on the game

grrofunger wrote:
and shaun hampson dont forget the incident involving shaun hampson


I knew that rapidly improving ruckman/forward with a fantastic future would be our downfall.

He's an albatross carrying a millstone and will surely be the ruination of the club.

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/