| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Walk up starts, how many do we have? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31422 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Lace Out [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
So we have come a long way and I have asked myself the question.....How many players on our list are an automatic inclusion on selection night?? Here's my list... Judd Murphy Kruezer Gibbs Yazz Walker Simpson Scotland Jamison Robinson Laidler Betts Gartlett Henderson Warnock Waite Carrazzo Hampson is not quite there yet when kruez and Warnock are available..... Thats 17 who have 2 hands on their position when fit....Russell has lost his spot to Duigan btw. The last 5 spots are wide open... So what are your lists?? |
|
| Author: | camel [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
I'd swap Gartlett for Garlett. |
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
What about Mark McClure? |
|
| Author: | Adelaide Blue [ Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
camelboy wrote: I'd swap Gartlett for Garlett. I'd rather have Buddy's cousin |
|
| Author: | Sydney Blue [ Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Warnock is not a walk up start any more |
|
| Author: | diesel_85 [ Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Sydney Blue wrote: Warnock is not a walk up start any more I would disagree. Warnocks tap work is second to none. More often than not giving our mids first use. IMO he would walk in ahead of hammer. |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Warnock's first use theory is a myth. He taps it straight down most of the time. Sure, he might have control of the tap, but either whoever had control of our stoppage strategies at the time had NFI and made it look like he had NFI, or he had NFI. |
|
| Author: | camel [ Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
diesel_85 wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: Warnock is not a walk up start any more I would disagree. Warnocks tap work is second to none. More often than not giving our mids first use. IMO he would walk in ahead of hammer. Tricky one, Hammer has more presence up forward and can take a pack mark, or more likely, drop it for the speedsters to crumb. Not sure playing all of Kreuzer, Hampson and Warnock in the same side will ever be a long term practice so I'd be picking Hampson at the moment, until he gets injured. |
|
| Author: | Lace Out [ Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
diesel_85 wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: Warnock is not a walk up start any more I would disagree. Warnocks tap work is second to none. More often than not giving our mids first use. IMO he would walk in ahead of hammer. He dominated in the finals last year which was really pleasing. I think the best of Warnock is yet to come... 
|
|
| Author: | redback [ Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Yazzamatazz wrote: diesel_85 wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: Warnock is not a walk up start any more I would disagree. Warnocks tap work is second to none. More often than not giving our mids first use. IMO he would walk in ahead of hammer. He dominated in the finals last year which was really pleasing. I think the best of Warnock is yet to come... I agree Yazz but you could also argue that Hampson's and Kruezer's best is yet to come. 
|
|
| Author: | Lace Out [ Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Yep, salivating isn't it?!! |
|
| Author: | Mickstar [ Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
I actually reckon we have about 24 maybee 25.What a great position to be in. |
|
| Author: | harker [ Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Judd Murphy Kruezer Gibbs Yazz Walker Simpson Scotland Jamison Robinson Laidler Betts Gartlett Henderson Warnock ???????????????? Waite Carrazzo Reckon you've nailed it for the top 16. Warnock / Hampson battle will ensue. Tuohy will be added to that top grouping soon enough and Russell should have been there, health allowing. Lucas and Mitchell will be the ones to press hard leading into next year. Whichever way that's a pretty solid foundation we have. |
|
| Author: | jake_h03 [ Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
Judd Murphy Kreuzer Gibbs Yazz Walker Simpson Scotland Jamison Robinson Laidler Betts Garlett Henderson Waite Carrazzo One of Warnock/Hampson depending on form/fitness. If hammer can start to play like he did against Richmond more often and take a few marks and average 2 goals a game then he gets the nod over Warnock. That makes 17, leaving only 5 places in our best 22 for fringe players, to be picked from: Duigan Lucas Tuohy Thornton Bower Armfield Curnow Mclean Russell Joseph Ellard Collins I think Duigan and Lucas are pretty close to walk up starts and should be by the end of the season. Man we have some serious depth with everyone fit. |
|
| Author: | windows [ Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Walk up starts, how many do we have? |
I think Thornton and Tuohy deserve to be recognized as walk up starts now and I don't think Curnow is far from joining them. For me, if they are all fit, Armfiled, Duigan Russell and Bower are fighting for the last two spots. Warnock for mine is just a better footballer than Hampson. I think the rest, probably lead by Lucas, are injury cover. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|