According to this...
http://www.afl.com.au/video/tabid/76/contentid/436120/rd+1+goal+of+the+week+-+clay+smith/default.aspx
Yaz's goal of the year was not even goal of the week
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Are they serious ??? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31416 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | GodisNavyBlue [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Are they serious ??? |
According to this... http://www.afl.com.au/video/tabid/76/contentid/436120/rd+1+goal+of+the+week+-+clay+smith/default.aspx Yaz's goal of the year was not even goal of the week
|
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
     
|
|
| Author: | The Vet [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
But you can vote for it here: http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/16412/default.aspx |
|
| Author: | GodisNavyBlue [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
The Vet wrote: But you can vote for it here: http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/16412/default.aspx So what is the other rubbish ? |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
The AFL were serious that Walker's 2011 mark wasn't MOY. I don't see any other mark used as much in the promotion of the AFL game. That's becuase here was no other mark better. There is no other goal better. Indelible. |
|
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Smith's is a great goal, particularly from a first gamer. But Yazz's surely takes the biscuit as a highlight. |
|
| Author: | The Rhino [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 1:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Nah, fair play. Smith's was a great goal, and deserved winner. Misses out on two free kicks, outbodies a much bigger and older player in Glass and dribbles it home. Composure. I still maintain the Tuohy bomb down the middle, Simpson's gut running to Armfield converting was better for sheer simplicity. |
|
| Author: | bluechucky [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Are they serious ??? |
The Rhino wrote: I still maintain the Tuohy bomb down the middle, Simpson's gut running to Armfield converting was better for sheer simplicity. That was pure poetry. |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
The Rhino wrote: Nah, fair play. Smith's was a great goal, and deserved winner. Misses out on two free kicks, outbodies a much bigger and older player in Glass and dribbles it home. Composure. It wasn't as good as the goals Yarran, Naitanui, Franklin and Ablett (both of them) kicked. I guess Smith gets points for getting caught and going to ground before kicking it off the ground... |
|
| Author: | Kaptain Kouta [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Kouta wrote: The Rhino wrote: Nah, fair play. Smith's was a great goal, and deserved winner. Misses out on two free kicks, outbodies a much bigger and older player in Glass and dribbles it home. Composure. It wasn't as good as the goals Yarran, Naitanui, Franklin and Ablett (both of them) kicked. I guess Smith gets points for getting caught and going to ground before kicking it off the ground... He was also scragged without the ball, and still managed to recover to kick the goal. |
|
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Kaptain Kouta wrote: Kouta wrote: The Rhino wrote: Nah, fair play. Smith's was a great goal, and deserved winner. Misses out on two free kicks, outbodies a much bigger and older player in Glass and dribbles it home. Composure. It wasn't as good as the goals Yarran, Naitanui, Franklin and Ablett (both of them) kicked. I guess Smith gets points for getting caught and going to ground before kicking it off the ground... He was also scragged without the ball, and still managed to recover to kick the goal. Yeah but who did he beat in the contest....oh! |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
So they're rewarding second efforts now? Pavlich's soccer goal was number one too... http://www.afl.com.au/Video/tabid/76/co ... fault.aspx
|
|
| Author: | Megaman [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Yazz torched the greatest midfielder to ever play the game though |
|
| Author: | eric pascoe [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Not sure who decides all this. If you've ever played footy.......Smith's was all luck in the end and Yarran's was pure class. |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
I think that may have been a club goal of the week video guys; it's certainly not the fan voted goal of the week, as voting is still open. Both goals were well struck by players who could have easily slung a tired boot onto it for a forgettable effort. |
|
| Author: | harker [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Would you go back for repeat viewings of Smith's goal? Quite silly when you think about it. |
|
| Author: | diesel_85 [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
IMO Smith's goal should've been holding the ball against him. He picked the ball up, took 3 steps and tried to shrug glass but was caught. |
|
| Author: | The Rhino [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are they serious ??? |
Wha? Smith was being held from behind by the jumper by Glass, evades him, gathers the ball, gets a push in the back, steadies, and dribbles it through. First year player, gets scragged by (statistically) last season's best full back in the competition, has the composure to outbody him and still kick the goal is fantastic. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|