TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Carlton's Organisational Direction? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31218 |
Page 1 of 9 |
Author: | dane [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Carlton's Organisational Direction? |
viewtopic.php?p=1227190#p1227190 Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Nah, Jim would've laughed. And possibly even yelled "Tell him he's only out there 'cause his old man could play a bit"...which is true. Dylan has a very long way to go. And best case scenario had he not been father-son would probably be a rookie list on the other side of the country. As always, nice reporting Harker...I hope to get along in February. My reports will be few and far between this year, and they won't be sugar coated. The Carlton Football Club's very small window of opportunity has opened. If they (players, coaches, board) don't take advantage of it, like the Saints and Bulldogs have failed to do, then the club faces a whole new set of problems...that I dare say - knowing this club - they are ill prepared for. Id prefer not hearing any reports at all from you if you're going to keep posting like you have lately. Your disappointment with the club is getting boring. I think everyone knows that you are not happy, stop dragging it into every thread. |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Just telling it like it is Dane. If you find you don't like them, use the foe function! |
Author: | dane [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Just telling it like it is Dane. If you find you don't like them, use the foe function! i think calling it how YOU see it is more accurate. why would anyone use the foe function? oh noes someone on an internet forum offended me! better foe them! i'm too precious to read their posts anymore! |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 1:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
dane wrote: Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Just telling it like it is Dane. If you find you don't like them, use the foe function! i think calling it how YOU see it is more accurate. I think you'll find I'm pretty accurate. But feel free to keep the blindfold on. |
Author: | dane [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Dr.SHERRIN wrote: dane wrote: Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Just telling it like it is Dane. If you find you don't like them, use the foe function! i think calling it how YOU see it is more accurate. I think you'll find I'm pretty accurate. But feel free to keep the blindfold on. You are beginning to sound like another Talking Carlton favorite .... |
Author: | Taff [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
dane wrote: Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Just telling it like it is Dane. If you find you don't like them, use the foe function! i think calling it how YOU see it is more accurate. why would anyone use the foe function? oh noes someone on an internet forum offended me! better foe them! i'm too precious to read their posts anymore! As far as I am concerned I want people to give their own perspective. That is what makes this site what it is. I find Doc's observations from what I can see are normally well considered. He appears to be close to the club and I value what he has to say. If for some reason I don't agree with a post re the team (unlikely as I live so far away) then a question or two can usually clarify without getting too excited. |
Author: | dane [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Training 27 Jan 2012 |
I agree with the comments about Doc. My problem with his observations is his negativity post the SOC incident. |
Author: | club29 [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
dane wrote: I agree with the comments about Doc. My problem with his observations is his negativity post the SOC incident. Agree Dane. I love Docs post usually but all that negative stuff sounds a bit sooky. Like he didnt get his way and has cracked it. Which is fine in a way. Taking his money elsewhere is his choice too but trying so hard to get others to get negative by continually posting this stuff is boring me a bit. Take your cash to Willy Doc and leave it be ! |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
You'll all have to get in line to join the anti-DocSherrin bandwagon I'm afraid. Ian Coutts is first in line and his staff aren't too far behind him! |
Author: | CK95 [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
If you left TC I'd start an alter ego, Nurse Faulkner |
Author: | tommi [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
SHEgoesalright..........! kindest regards tommi |
Author: | CK95 [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Oooh I think KK had her as an avatar. |
Author: | tommi [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
WAKEUP............ MAKEUP...........! kindest regards tommi |
Author: | CK95 [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
![]() |
Author: | isdonis.george [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Doc Sherrin's training reports are amazing. They have brightened up many a day ![]() Stay around Doc. |
Author: | club29 [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
I hope my post didnt come across aggressive. It wasn't meant to be. Just reckon Doc has made his point. Has made his protest with his cash and in my opinion should leave it at that. The rest of his posts are top notch. |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Well I think there's an easy compromise folks. I'll post all the positive, sugar coated, feel-good, kumbaya Carlton stuff on here (in accordance with Dane's wishes). And for anything slightly negative or any criticism or questioning leveled at the club, I can post on SCE (where only a handful will read it anyway). While a few of you don't like to hear the club publicly being criticized through online forums, the tiny ripple emanating from these forums doesn't rock the boat very much (if at all). The club doesn't care about you. You are irrelevant. |
Author: | Taff [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Well I think there's an easy compromise folks. I'll post all the positive, sugar coated, feel-good, kumbaya Carlton stuff on here (in accordance with Dane's wishes). And for anything slightly negative or any criticism or questioning leveled at the club, I can post on SCE (where only a handful will read it anyway). While a few of you don't like to hear the club publicly being criticized through online forums, the tiny ripple emanating from these forums doesn't rock the boat very much (if at all). The club doesn't care about you. You are irrelevant. Rise above it all Doc and keep posting as you see it! |
Author: | harker [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Well I think there's an easy compromise folks. I'll post all the positive, sugar coated, feel-good, kumbaya Carlton stuff on here (in accordance with Dane's wishes). And for anything slightly negative or any criticism or questioning leveled at the club, I can post on SCE (where only a handful will read it anyway). While a few of you don't like to hear the club publicly being criticized through online forums, the tiny ripple emanating from these forums doesn't rock the boat very much (if at all). The club doesn't care about you. You are irrelevant. Not sure why we have to get down on the club or the players through training reports, Doc? I've only been here for a relative moment so I won't pretend to understand the workings of this board or individuals agenda's within it. Politics aside, I'm just glad to have a team capable of giving the big boys a shake right now and isn't that what it's all about, irrespective of any percieved, or for that matter, known issues? |
Author: | harker [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Training 27 Jan 2012 |
harker wrote: Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Well I think there's an easy compromise folks. I'll post all the positive, sugar coated, feel-good, kumbaya Carlton stuff on here (in accordance with Dane's wishes). And for anything slightly negative or any criticism or questioning leveled at the club, I can post on SCE (where only a handful will read it anyway). While a few of you don't like to hear the club publicly being criticized through online forums, the tiny ripple emanating from these forums doesn't rock the boat very much (if at all). The club doesn't care about you. You are irrelevant. Not sure why we have to get down on the club or the players through training reports, Doc? I've only been here for a relative moment so I won't pretend to understand the workings of this board or individuals agenda's within it. Politics aside, I'm just glad to have a team capable of giving the big boys a shake right now and isn't that what it's all about, irrespective of any percieved, or for that matter, known issues? |
Page 1 of 9 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |