Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 9:38 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Good interview just before he boarded plane for training camp

mentioned only 2 picks in draft plus Buckley - said that they were really keen to see young ones develop -happy how we drafted last year - mentioned McCarthy watson mitchell - said also expect improvement from kerr and lucas
When setanta was mentioned and why he was delisted suggested that S was 28-29 and he being on the list derogated from the development of hampson -a no 17 pick and that we really neded to see what he could do in terms of playing forward - also wanted Kreuze to have more chance as a forward
suggested that delisting Setanta was a difficult decision but needed to do it to give our young talls a go.
Admitted that setanta delisting may come back to bite us but that every club need to make those decisions and we know what Setanta is capable of but maybe mitchell mccarthy and watson will be better

Also said that keeping outr KPP fit and on the park was important -mentioned waite also suggested that geelong model in keeping everyone fit and firing at the right time of the year is a model he wants to follow - I took from that he may tap the captain on the shoulder before a couple of matches next year indicating he may have a rest (not before time I reckon)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Thanks for the update Frank. :beer:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:44 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
There ain't no second prize. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:34 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
Also suggested we may go for a 3 tall forward line next year, rather than the 2 tall set up we had this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Stefchook wrote:
Also suggested we may go for a 3 tall forward line next year, rather than the 2 tall set up we had this year.


We didnt have 2 all that often by the end of the season.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
buzzaaaah wrote:
Stefchook wrote:
Also suggested we may go for a 3 tall forward line next year, rather than the 2 tall set up we had this year.


We didnt have 2 all that often by the end of the season.

"Yeah but you've got Thornton who can take a mark and kick a goal, and then there's Walker who can play tall..."

... meanwhile there's 10 tall defenders on the list.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:43 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 629
Cheers Frank

_________________
Chris Judd: 'I've since watched some Steven Seagal movies and realise pressure points are no laughing matter.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:27 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 4581
Location: St Helens
frank dardew wrote:
Good interview just before he boarded plane for training camp

mentioned only 2 picks in draft plus Buckley - said that they were really keen to see young ones develop -happy how we drafted last year - mentioned McCarthy watson mitchell - said also expect improvement from kerr and lucas
When setanta was mentioned and why he was delisted suggested that S was 28-29 and he being on the list derogated from the development of hampson -a no 17 pick and that we really neded to see what he could do in terms of playing forward - also wanted Kreuze to have more chance as a forward
suggested that delisting Setanta was a difficult decision but needed to do it to give our young talls a go.
Admitted that setanta delisting may come back to bite us but that every club need to make those decisions and we know what Setanta is capable of but maybe mitchell mccarthy and watson will be better

Also said that keeping outr KPP fit and on the park was important -mentioned waite also suggested that geelong model in keeping everyone fit and firing at the right time of the year is a model he wants to follow - I took from that he may tap the captain on the shoulder before a couple of matches next year indicating he may have a rest (not before time I reckon)


Cheers Frank :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:19 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Noticed in the AGE today Connolly took Rattens comments(or has been in here- hello Rohan ) to also mean that we will seek to follow the Geelong model and rest vital players at various times of the year if possible

Ratts also mentioned in the interview depending on who steps up amongst young talls in the backline that he hasnt ruled out the Henderstar going forward in the future


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:22 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Just read that Frank

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/c ... 1mxxb.html

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
Stefchook wrote:
Also suggested we may go for a 3 tall forward line next year, rather than the 2 tall set up we had this year.


As long as two of them aren't ruckmen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:25 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9800
Location: Australia
jim wrote:
Stefchook wrote:
Also suggested we may go for a 3 tall forward line next year, rather than the 2 tall set up we had this year.


As long as two of them aren't ruckmen.


Hmm, depends whether Ratts defines Krueze and Hampson as ruckmen or forwards?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:26 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
what would ratts know?

they are ruckmen only according to all the experts here

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
grrofunger wrote:
what would ratts know?

they are ruckmen only according to all the experts here


Ratts doesn't have a magic wand either. I think we all have a pretty good idea how they are as forwards just by watching them many times before.

How many ruckmen make it as forwards, very few. It's a different skill. It's a move born from desperation because of lack of options. We have better options. Let's face it, if we had KP forward options he wouldn't contemplate training up ruckmen to fill the role. Think we all know that. In other words, it's out of desperation.


Last edited by jim on Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
sinbagger wrote:
jim wrote:
Stefchook wrote:
Also suggested we may go for a 3 tall forward line next year, rather than the 2 tall set up we had this year.


As long as two of them aren't ruckmen.


Hmm, depends whether Ratts defines Krueze and Hampson as ruckmen or forwards?


Makes no difference what he defines them as, we know they are, and were recruited as, ruckmen. Forwards they weren't real good at. Define them what one likes, won't make them play the role better. Like flogging a dead horse with that one. Give Kreuzer more chance as he can actually hold a mark. Given one will be resting in a FP, that's ok and the spot for a ruckman when forward, but not in the KP. Thornton showed he a was a trillion times better KP forward than Hampson and even then we're looking for better still.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
jim wrote:
It's a move born from desperation because of lack of options. We have better options.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
:lol:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Where were these ideas 3 months ago when they could have saved our season? :|

Ah well, lesson learnt.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:32 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
jimmae wrote:
Where were these ideas 3 months ago when they could have saved our season? :|

Ah well, lesson learnt.


I agree we have learnt some things.

Speed destroyed the dons. No point changing the small forward line for them.

With the Eagles we needed our best tall defenders in defence and were down tall players.

Having said that, if we had Gibbs available and Tbird didnt go down we may have got that extra goal to get past WC.

I doubt we will go for the 3 tall forwards as plan A by the time the 2012 season starts and i doubt those young defenders will become options in 2012 so i reckon Henda will stay back and Hampson, Waite, Kreuzer, Walker, and T Bird will be our marking forward options IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:20 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
grrofunger wrote:
what would ratts know?

they are ruckmen only according to all the experts here


Agreed grro... Apparently, our keyboard boffins think they've seen enough of Hampson in the forward line to categorically put a line through him as a forward. Some people need to watch Ratt's first 50 games. thank god Parko had faith in him cause they were pretty uninspiring. I'm not saying that Hammer to FF will work but I am saying that its worth giving it a go for a year at least

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group