What a walk that would have been.
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Hammer would have played!! http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=30863 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | 2ndeffort [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Hammer would have played!! |
Article in Today's HUN says that Hammer was all set to go against WCE but he turned his ankle in the leadup going for a jog with Megan Gale. WTF!!! |
|
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
2ndeffort wrote: Article in Today's HUN says that Hammer was all set to go against WCE but he turned his ankle in the leadup going for a jog with Megan Gale. WTF!!! She better be the best shag of all time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
What a walk that would have been.
|
|
| Author: | AIRCAV [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
2ndeffort wrote: going for a jog with Megan Gale. WTF!!! Is that what they are calling "it" these days ? |
|
| Author: | The Normal One [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
Sandra Slutty with the late news. The HS are trying to take over from sportsnewsfirst as the worst media outlet. |
|
| Author: | Just Judd [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
Was at the carlton grand final eve lunch yesterday and when they interviewed ratts he confirmed this story hence why it is news today... |
|
| Author: | Megaman [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
No wonder he dumped her 
|
|
| Author: | kingkerna [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
I have an image of him turning to look behind at her and running into a light pole |
|
| Author: | muzza [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
AIRCAV wrote: 2ndeffort wrote: going for a jog with Megan Gale. WTF!!! Is that what they are calling "it" these days ? I am married so I do most of my jogging with myself.....I mean, by myself 
|
|
| Author: | Outback Blue [ Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
2ndeffort wrote: he turned his ankle in the leadup going for a jog with Megan Gale. WTF!!! Well if we can make the Grand Final next year, maybe we can send the whole opposing team jogging with her. |
|
| Author: | camel [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
2ndeffort wrote: Article in Today's HUN says that Hammer was all set to go against WCE but he turned his ankle in the leadup going for a jog with Megan Gale. WTF!!! For ref -> http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/f ... 6154503923 |
|
| Author: | Blue Steel [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
I guess the question is who would he have replaced and what difference would it have made? We had our chances. |
|
| Author: | Sin City [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
Blue Steel wrote: I guess the question is who would he have replaced and what difference would it have made? We had our chances. Yeah, don't see how he would've helped all those skill errors and poor manning up in the second quarter. |
|
| Author: | caulfieldrover [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
What a load of BS, where was he planning to play, back pocket? |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
The Collingwood and Essendon* Gazette Quote: Sean Hampson Sean, Gartlett and Kruezer could give us a handy forwardline if they work out. |
|
| Author: | teagueyubeauty [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
Sin City wrote: Blue Steel wrote: I guess the question is who would he have replaced and what difference would it have made? We had our chances. Yeah, don't see how he would've helped all those skill errors and poor manning up in the second quarter. Certainly would have helped in not getting smashed out of the ruck in the 2nd term, and for long periods in the game overall, which is where most of the damage was done. |
|
| Author: | Sin City [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
teagueyubeauty wrote: Sin City wrote: Blue Steel wrote: I guess the question is who would he have replaced and what difference would it have made? We had our chances. Yeah, don't see how he would've helped all those skill errors and poor manning up in the second quarter. Certainly would have helped in not getting smashed out of the ruck in the 2nd term, and for long periods in the game overall, which is where most of the damage was done. That's hardly where most of the damage was done. Skill errors under perceived pressure from the midfield and defenders is where we fell down as well as getting hurt on the rebound. Hampson becomes a better player with each week that he misses. |
|
| Author: | 2ndeffort [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
Sin City wrote: Hampson becomes a better player with each week that he misses. He must be the second coming of Wayne Carey by now then!! |
|
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
Sin City wrote: [ That's hardly where most of the damage was done. Skill errors under perceived pressure from the midfield and defenders is where we fell down as well as getting hurt on the rebound. Hampson becomes a better player with each week that he misses. We got smashed at the clearances and Warnock had no back-up. You can never know for sure if we'd have won but it was clear that the MC wanted him to play and so they thought he was an improvement. I was at the game and i certainly believe that Hammer could have had a big impact. |
|
| Author: | Sin City [ Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hammer would have played!! |
cimm1979 wrote: Sin City wrote: [ That's hardly where most of the damage was done. Skill errors under perceived pressure from the midfield and defenders is where we fell down as well as getting hurt on the rebound. Hampson becomes a better player with each week that he misses. We got smashed at the clearances and Warnock had no back-up. You can never know for sure if we'd have won but it was clear that the MC wanted him to play and so they thought he was an improvement. I was at the game and i certainly believe that Hammer could have had a big impact. They had five more clearances than us in a game where Judd was monstered and couldn't get free. Hampson more than anyone else on the list plays better the more match fitness and continuity in his play that he gets, bringing him in for his first game back while underdone would've been a mistake in a big final. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|