Kouta wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
He makes sense. After this year, when Murph has starred in a GF like Thomas and Pendlebury have, he'll be first.
Why does Murphy have to star in a GF to be rated as high as Thomas and Pendlebury?
Skilton never won a flag.
By that rational, you would rate Sidebottom, Dawes and Goldsack higher than Yarran, Kennedy and Jamison.
Kennedy is a more complete player than Dawes.
Better mark.
You misunderstand grasshopper. I don't rate them higher than Murph. But it makes sense that non-Carlton people do. The three of them are guns - I think we all agree on that. And there's not a lot to distinguish them. I, personally, think that Murph is the best of them, but when it's all said and done, they're all pretty good, they've all demonstrated that they're matchwinners, and two of them have done it on the biggest stage.
Let me ask
you one. Riewoldt is a gun isn't he? But you know what? His little brain fade in the first quarter of the 2nd GF (when he played on in the goal square) just might have cost his team a premiership - a real momentum swinger. That's high on my list of attributes. See all things being equal, Riewoldt is a better player than Mark Maclure ever was. But I'd take Sellers in a heartbeat!!! Why? Because he performed in GFs - EVERY TIME. And Riewoldt has failed. EVERY TIME.
Now, I'm a little strange, because I'd also take Sheldon, Buckley and Marcou over Skilton for the same reason. Go figure, eh??!
_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!
After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit
http://fromthemoshpit.com/