TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Conspiracy theorists welcome http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=30117 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Blue Sombrero [ Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Interesting that teams are always flat after a bye. This has been the case both times the AFL has had a bye in the roster in recent times. This year, even Collingwood got done after their bye. Guess who has the bye in Round 23, the week before the finals? |
Author: | diesel_85 [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
here's my theory... We have the saints in rd24 by then they'll be tanking for picks by then we'll have sewn up a top 4 berth = TRAINING RUN Bye at rd23 will be a nice freshen up |
Author: | aramari [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Blue Sombrero wrote: Interesting that teams are always flat after a bye. This has been the case both times the AFL has had a bye in the roster in recent times. This year, even Collingwood got done after their bye. Guess who has the bye in Round 23, the week before the finals? Sorry to disappoint those fans with a victim mentality, but there is a round 24, and Essendon* has the bye that round. Almost makes worth dropping out of the 4 enticing ![]() We play Saints round 24, should be a good preparation for finals I would think. We come into finals fresh but not dozy. |
Author: | aramari [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Out of interest, I wonder how many teams have lost a prelim after winning week 1 and getting a week off? |
Author: | CK95 [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
aramari wrote: Out of interest, I wonder how many teams have lost a prelim after winning week 1 and getting a week off? ![]() |
Author: | diesel_85 [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
that would want to be one damn important booger, Steve Alessio! |
Author: | Pklz [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
CK95 wrote: aramari wrote: Out of interest, I wonder how many teams have lost a prelim after winning week 1 and getting a week off? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | missnaut [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
We'll either have our spot consolidated and it won't matter, or we'll be playing to cement it and we'll be switched on, especially if it means stomping out the Saints finals hopes. |
Author: | bluegirl72 [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
We would have beaten geelong after the bye if our Rrrobbie weren't concussed. ![]() |
Author: | tommi [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Just give us the Cup.........! kindest regards tommi |
Author: | Hotcox [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
bluegirl72 wrote: We would have beaten geelong after the bye if our Rrrobbie weren't concussed. ![]() Warnock was not concussed when he had that shot. He had delayed concussion which occurred 30mins after the game was over. Warnock choked under pressure, this is why he missed that set shot. |
Author: | TruBlueBrad [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
![]() |
Author: | bluegirl72 [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Hotcox wrote: bluegirl72 wrote: We would have beaten geelong after the bye if our Rrrobbie weren't concussed. ![]() Warnock was not concussed when he had that shot. He had delayed concussion which occurred 30mins after the game was over. Warnock choked under pressure, this is why he missed that set shot. ![]() |
Author: | Pafloyul [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
I don't remember that it was snowing that day. ![]() |
Author: | Megaman [ Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
You have to bow down to Dr Hotcox intimate knowledge of Warnock's health at that point in the game. |
Author: | bluegirl72 [ Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Megaman wrote: You have to bow down to Dr Hotcox intimate knowledge of Warnock's health at that point in the game. Robbie's face was a study in 'green around the gills.' Poor lad. |
Author: | Captain Dan [ Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
To be quite honest I'm not sure even a healthy Robbie would have kicked the goal. Just sayin.. |
Author: | Punter22 [ Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Captain Dan wrote: To be quite honest I'm not sure even a healthy Robbie would have kicked the goal. Just sayin.. I think he would have, he's a decent kick for his size. I just can't believe people blame him for that. Pretty sad really. |
Author: | Juzzy [ Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conspiracy theorists welcome |
Hotcox wrote: bluegirl72 wrote: We would have beaten geelong after the bye if our Rrrobbie weren't concussed. ![]() Warnock was not concussed when he had that shot. He had delayed concussion which occurred 30mins after the game was over. Warnock choked under pressure, this is why he missed that set shot. That explains why he looked like he was going to pass out just seconds being it lying on the ground.. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |