Pros
Judd
Murphy
Irish
Watts, must of had 4-5 score assists for us.. Gun.
Cons
Were lazy, didn't get out of 2nd as someone said
Boring too watch
Injuries
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=30072 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Heavs [ Fri May 27, 2011 10:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Pro: Judd Murph Robbo wanting to be there Jamo continuing to improve as a rebounding rather than negating backman never looking threatened Injuries = opportunities against Port/Brisbane next two weeks Con: Never got out of second gear. I wanted to demolish them I'm a McLean fan. Wanted us to recruit him. He looked a metre off the pace again tonight. Hope he can get it rolling again. Injuries. Laidler will hurt. JR more so. Hammer would be the best player in the league if he could catch the @#$%&! thing. Always gets first hands, never holds it. Still waiting but not as patiently as before! |
|
| Author: | 99prelim [ Fri May 27, 2011 10:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Pro: we won and in top 4 Con: Hampson Carazzo injuries McLean - what were they thinking!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Author: | Juzzy [ Fri May 27, 2011 10:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Pros Judd Murphy Irish Watts, must of had 4-5 score assists for us.. Gun. Cons Were lazy, didn't get out of 2nd as someone said Boring too watch Injuries
|
|
| Author: | bluedog [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Pro: We get to play them again in Round 20. Con: scum play them next week (but only play them once, which is a pro). |
|
| Author: | Drewgirl [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES |
|
| Author: | Stamos [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
CONS Rubbish game Laidler's injury PRO 8 goal win |
|
| Author: | Lurker Blue [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Drewgirl wrote: HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES What happened to the gloves? They were really in vogue 5-10 years ago, but hardly anyone wears them now. Hammer seems like a player who could really benefit. |
|
| Author: | 99prelim [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Drewgirl wrote: HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES especially when he's gardening in September at the beginning of spring |
|
| Author: | club29 [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
99prelim wrote: Drewgirl wrote: HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES especially when he's gardening in September at the beginning of spring Getting to so many marks is his undoing. Warnock doesnt get to any and his marking or lack of never gets mentioned. |
|
| Author: | Blues87 [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
club29 wrote: 99prelim wrote: Drewgirl wrote: HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES especially when he's gardening in September at the beginning of spring Getting to so many marks is his undoing. Warnock doesnt get to any and his marking or lack of never gets mentioned. Fair point. Warnock and Hammer should both be taking more marks for us. Our game plan involves kicking long to the tall timber out of defence much more often than in recent seasons so if they start plucking more marks, the gameplan becomes that much more effective. I think that's why both Judd and Murph both spoke with such eagerness about the return of Kreuzer in a couple of weeks. |
|
| Author: | chubbyruss [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Hampson is 23 & Warnock is 24. How long did it take Cox, Jolly & Sandilands to come good 
|
|
| Author: | TruBlueBrad [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
99prelim wrote: Drewgirl wrote: HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES especially when he's gardening in September at the beginning of spring Hey, what are you doing here......we won! |
|
| Author: | kezza [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Pros We won Jud Murphy Olivia Newton John  Robbo Garlett almost kicking goal of the year with his run down the wing just on 3/4 time. Cons Boring game Injuries Some deadbeat (Carlton supporter) sitting right near us who bagged Murphy all night, must have been watching a different game. Hampson's marking attempts |
|
| Author: | missnaut [ Fri May 27, 2011 11:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Pros - 8 goal win without really trying - Murphy. - Irish - Jeffy Cons - Shithouse game to watch - Injuries - Annoying Melbourne supporting Pom droning on about anything but the game all night then doing the old "Carlton haven't beaten anyone good" at about the 25 minute mark of the last quarter. |
|
| Author: | Cazzesman [ Sat May 28, 2011 12:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
 Featuring the one and only Bryce!  Coming to an AFL ground near you soon.  Regards Cazzesman |
|
| Author: | Blue Monday [ Sat May 28, 2011 12:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Con: Murph has pretty much killed Judd's chances of a 3rd brownlow Pro Murph has pretty much killed Judd's chances of a 3rd brownlow |
|
| Author: | Adam Chatfield [ Sat May 28, 2011 12:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
I know we all want him to succeed, but Brock is a massive concern. To me he looks the same as when he played last year, that the game has passed him by, and he looks out of sync with the rest of our team. I am sure injury has a massive amount to do with it, but his best footy was played in 2006, and that is now a very long time ago. I would only be playing him if Curnow still isn't right next week. If Curnow is fit he is definitely in our best 22. |
|
| Author: | Kaptain Kouta [ Sat May 28, 2011 12:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
Lurker Blue wrote: Drewgirl wrote: HAMMO SHOULD WEAR GLOVES What happened to the gloves? They were really in vogue 5-10 years ago, but hardly anyone wears them now. Hammer seems like a player who could really benefit. Is Adrian De Luca his marking coach? |
|
| Author: | Zippy [ Sat May 28, 2011 2:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
I thought McLean's second half was OK. I'd give him another chance. Murphy 145 DT.  Judd and Murphy both could share the Brownlow. 
|
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Sat May 28, 2011 8:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R10 : Melbourne Pro v Cons |
chubbyruss wrote: Hampson is 23 & Warnock is 24. How long did it take Cox, Jolly & Sandilands to come good Agree. Once Hampson gets it together .... look out!!! He is going to be awsome. I was quite happy with him last night.
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|