Blues by 43pts...
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Bombers have better list and better under 22's? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=29817 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | The Normal One [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 1di0c.html Under 22: (Only showing semi-regulars) Blues: Garlett, Henderson, Kreuzer, Watson, Joseph, Lailder, Lucas, Robinson, Yarran, Curnow Bombers: Bellchambers, Collyer, Heppell, Hurley, Melksham, Myers, Pears, Zaharakis Another article passed through the translator I think. I haven't added the Herald Sun'd love child Ed Burnow either. |
|
| Author: | doofdoof [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
blah |
|
| Author: | Juzzy [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Baaaahahahahahahahhahahahaha Kruezer ALONE deads this argument |
|
| Author: | moshe25 [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Rafalution wrote: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/talls-give-dons-edge-over-blues-20110415-1di0c.html Under 22: (Only showing semi-regulars) Blues: Garlett, Henderson, Kreuzer, Watson, Joseph, Lailder, Lucas, Robinson, Yarran, Curnow Bombers: Bellchambers, Collyer, Heppell, Hurley, Melksham, Myers, Pears, Zaharakis Another article passed through the translator I think. I haven't added the Herald Sun'd love child Ed Burnow either. Ha!! What about Carrazzo? |
|
| Author: | Punter22 [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Interesting article. Interesting in the sense that being up and about early in the season can mean your suddenly more talented. Aside from the obvious benefits of four poitns etc etc, I think we'll be doing the rest of the league a huge favour by smashing them this week. |
|
| Author: | Adam Chatfield [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
All this is good, pump them up now before the game. |
|
| Author: | Donstuie [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
If we win, we can laugh If we lose, they're unfortunately right |
|
| Author: | Adam Chatfield [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Donstuie wrote: If we win, we can laugh If we lose, they're unfortunately right The may get over the line today, but the war is far from over. I still think regardless of todays result we will finish above them. |
|
| Author: | missnaut [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Rafalution wrote: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/talls-give-dons-edge-over-blues-20110415-1di0c.html Under 22: (Only showing semi-regulars) Blues: Garlett, Henderson, Kreuzer, Watson, Joseph, Lailder, Lucas, Robinson, Yarran, Curnow Bombers: Bellchambers, Collyer, Heppell, Hurley, Melksham, Myers, Pears, Zaharakis Another article passed through the translator I think. I haven't added the Herald Sun'd love child Ed Burnow either. Kreuzer and Garlett. Nuff said. |
|
| Author: | Springsteen [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
09 we had all this bullshit hype and were favs to beat em. walls crapped out an article about our fab 4. we lost and Essendon* will suffer the same demise today. this is the game of the year for us, lose and we're back to square 1, win and we going top 4 |
|
| Author: | Hornet [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Blues by 43pts... |
|
| Author: | Bluey44 [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Essendon* could put out garden gnomes on the field and the media would still rate them higher than us. |
|
| Author: | tommi [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Fast Gnomes though...........! kindest regards tommi |
|
| Author: | teagueyubeauty [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
I remember the same argument between Geelong and the Aints, the one that was looked at as inferior has 2 premierships. The other Sweet @#$%&! all |
|
| Author: | Blueboy74 [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Sheehan did the same thing last year re Melbourne v Carlton, and the 3AW boys (King, and maybe Matthews) last week said the same I think in reference to who would you - or Malthouse for that matter - rather coach between the same sides. As for Essendon* they are flavour of the month, whatever, all will hopefully change in 4 hours time. |
|
| Author: | bluechucky [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
our players simply dont do the hard stuff, the 1%ers that their players do. |
|
| Author: | Juddy&theKruezers [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
We wont truly know until we have changed coach as well... 
|
|
| Author: | verbs [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Can't believe they spanked us like that. We will finish well below them this year. They looked so good. I think some seamen leaked out whilst watching them. I hope they are back on board. |
|
| Author: | Michael Jezz [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
The difference between Carlton and Essendon* is 80% coaching. That is not to say that we are not short some talent but the difference between these particular sides is mainly in the coaching boxes (or in Carlton's case the seat on the boundary line) |
|
| Author: | Sugarcane [ Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's? |
Michael Jezz wrote: The difference between Carlton and Essendon* is 80% coaching. That is not to say that we are not short some talent but the difference between these particular sides is mainly in the coaching boxes (or in Carlton's case the seat on the boundary line) 100% spot on Ratten is a goose. Swann and Sticks aurely know this Outcoached from get go today, took us 40 mins to get first goal I think bec game plan and fwdline strategy was pathetic Hope Swann was in the box today Can't beat a scum team with 2 players down granted that equates to one these days but yuou get my drift it is still a 7% advantage I think |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|