TalkingCarlton • View topic - Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours

Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Page 1 of 2

[ 29 posts ]

Go to page 1, 2 Next

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

The Normal One

Post subject: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:27 am

formerly King Kenny

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 1di0c.html

Under 22: (Only showing semi-regulars)

Blues: Garlett, Henderson, Kreuzer, Watson, Joseph, Lailder, Lucas, Robinson, Yarran, Curnow
Bombers: Bellchambers, Collyer, Heppell, Hurley, Melksham, Myers, Pears, Zaharakis

Another article passed through the translator I think. I haven't added the Herald Sun'd love child Ed Burnow either.

Top

doofdoof

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:06 am

Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251

blah

Top

Juzzy

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:20 am

Trevor Keogh

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:23 pm
Posts: 715

Baaaahahahahahahahhahahahaha Kruezer ALONE deads this argument

_________________
#23: Lachlan Henderson

Top

moshe25

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:29 am

Vale 1953-2020

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671

Rafalution wrote:

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/talls-give-dons-edge-over-blues-20110415-1di0c.html

Under 22: (Only showing semi-regulars)

Blues: Garlett, Henderson, Kreuzer, Watson, Joseph, Lailder, Lucas, Robinson, Yarran, Curnow
Bombers: Bellchambers, Collyer, Heppell, Hurley, Melksham, Myers, Pears, Zaharakis

Another article passed through the translator I think. I haven't added the Herald Sun'd love child Ed Burnow either.

Ha!! What about Carrazzo?

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/

Top

Punter22

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:43 am

Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner

Interesting article. Interesting in the sense that being up and about early in the season can mean your suddenly more talented.

Aside from the obvious benefits of four poitns etc etc, I think we'll be doing the rest of the league a huge favour by smashing them this week.

Top

Adam Chatfield

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:05 am

Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne

All this is good, pump them up now before the game.

Top

Donstuie

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:08 am

Bruce Doull

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED

If we win, we can laugh

If we lose, they're unfortunately right

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY

Top

Adam Chatfield

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:11 am

Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne

Donstuie wrote:

If we win, we can laugh

If we lose, they're unfortunately right

The may get over the line today, but the war is far from over. I still think regardless of todays result we will finish above them.

Top

missnaut

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:23 am

Ken Hunter

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13430
Location: Melbourne

Rafalution wrote:

Kreuzer and Garlett. Nuff said.

Top

Springsteen

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:13 am

Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813

09 we had all this bullshit hype and were favs to beat em. walls crapped out an article about our fab 4. we lost and Essendon* will suffer the same demise today. this is the game of the year for us, lose and we're back to square 1, win and we going top 4

Top

Hornet

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:40 am

Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360

Blues by 43pts...

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman

Top

Bluey44

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:51 am

Robert Walls

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy

Essendon* could put out garden gnomes on the field and the media would still rate them higher than us.

Top

tommi

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:06 pm

Bruce Doull

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside

Fast Gnomes though...........!

kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!

Top

teagueyubeauty

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:28 pm

Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450

I remember the same argument between Geelong and the Aints, the one that was looked at as inferior has 2 premierships.

The other Sweet @#$%&! all

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!

Top

Blueboy74

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:04 pm

Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.

Sheehan did the same thing last year re Melbourne v Carlton, and the 3AW boys (King, and maybe Matthews) last week said the same I think in reference to who would you - or Malthouse for that matter - rather coach between the same sides.

As for Essendon* they are flavour of the month, whatever, all will hopefully change in 4 hours time.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'

Top

bluechucky

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:50 pm

Ken Hunter

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689

our players simply dont do the hard stuff, the 1%ers that their players do.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash

Top

Juddy&theKruezers

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:40 pm

Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426

We wont truly know until we have changed coach as well... :wink:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul" — Lauro Aguirre

Top

verbs

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:26 pm

Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*

Can't believe they spanked us like that. We will finish well below them this year. They looked so good. I think some seamen leaked out whilst watching them. I hope they are back on board.

Top

Michael Jezz

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:49 pm

Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044

The difference between Carlton and Essendon* is 80% coaching. That is not to say that we are not short some talent but the difference between these particular sides is mainly in the coaching boxes (or in Carlton's case the seat on the boundary line)

Top

Sugarcane

Post subject: Re: Bombers have better list and better under 22's?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:18 pm

formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628

Michael Jezz wrote:

100% spot on

Ratten is a goose.

Swann and Sticks aurely know this

Outcoached from get go today, took us 40 mins to get first goal I think bec game plan and fwdline strategy was pathetic

Hope Swann was in the box today

Can't beat a scum team with 2 players down granted that equates to one these days but yuou get my drift it is still a 7% advantage I think

Top

Page 1 of 2

[ 29 posts ]

Go to page 1, 2 Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum