gerry atric wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
club felt 2010 assistants were too green and set about bringing coaches who had greater and more varied experiences. New assistants have been fantastic.
Thanks for the info Maxy. Be interesting to know why the club appointed inexperienced coaches in the first place, and then removed them several years later for being too inexperienced. Suggests problems with the way we go about making appointment decisions and reflects on admin and board. Its a question most of us asked at the time, and the club decided to ask after three years.
.........and the quality may not have been available for assistants. The best coaching staff in the world would have struggled to get our list (such as it was) to achieve much more than it did.
Without judging Ratts abilities, it would be fair to say that if Roo's, Matthews or Malthouse had been available, he may not have got the gig.
There was not much else jumping out at us, our list was still diabolical, so the appointment of Ratts made sense.