Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:34 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 721 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 37  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 4:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1654
I agree Surrey Blue.

It's not bitching and moaning; it's agitating, and it's an opinion based on the fact that the GF is played there, that we could be a big crowd club again there. Did people notice that with such hype during the week last week we only got 57K to the ground? Icelands is good for boutique purposes and I believe we have learned to play it well (see bulldogs, saints, swans wins last year), but you're absolutely discouraged from just rocking up there. At the 'G you can do that, and i think we have a few fair weather supporters who would go to the 'G but not Icelands.

Princes Park would be brilliant, but like others I see energies best spent on getting to the 'G. The pre-season game against the Crows with a couple of home brews sitting in the Pratt stand with a view to the Mt Macedon....that was enjoyable. It's where I saw my first full season of footy with reserved seats, in 1981, when the mosquito fleet were flying. One can dream.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17877
Surrey you're living in fantasy land.

Geelong wasn't so profitable until Steve Bracks decided he wanted to win a few seats in geelong. The ground was developed with Govt, AFL and Geelong council money. Nobody was willing to fund Princes Park's upgrade. The MCC wanted us out of there, AFL wanted us out. We weren't making any money while we there, so the status quo wasnt an option.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10061
Sorry Buzzah but you need to have a chat with some people in the know (club).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:38 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
I don't know the details of how profitable we were when we were playing at PP, but I do know that we were millions of dollars in debt at the time, which suggests maybe we weren't making money.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Siegfried wrote:
I don't know the details of how profitable we were when we were playing at PP, but I do know that we were millions of dollars in debt at the time, which suggests maybe we weren't making money.


We were making heaps. But spending more. :donk:

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 4:54 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
I think I can safely say that we all agree that we want Carlton to be a superpower again. In order to achieve our objective, I believe that if we control our ground, we can control our own destiny. If Carlton can control the ground, they can control the spectacle and therefore the gate receipts and the broadcast rights. I recall a media report that the AFL may be putting a value for the broadcast rights for the next agreement at about $1 Billion.

If Carlton's home ground is under the control of the owners of the MCG (that is, the MCG Trustees), I would have to assume that those owners discharge their responsibilities and duties that are in the best interests of the MCG, not necessarily Carlton (and properly so).

I believe that the MCG should be our home ground, as an interim measure, until such time we return to Princes Park. Princes Park should be developed to a pure AFL stadium, not a multi-purpose stadium. There are options to develop.

Live the dream! :smile:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:28 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 5816
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
I think I can safely say that we all agree that we want Carlton to be a superpower again. In order to achieve our objective, I believe that if we control our ground, we can control our own destiny. If Carlton can control the ground, they can control the spectacle and therefore the gate receipts and the broadcast rights. I recall a media report that the AFL may be putting a value for the broadcast rights for the next agreement at about $1 Billion.

If Carlton's home ground is under the control of the owners of the MCG (that is, the MCG Trustees), I would have to assume that those owners discharge their responsibilities and duties that are in the best interests of the MCG, not necessarily Carlton (and properly so).

I believe that the MCG should be our home ground, as an interim measure, until such time we return to Princes Park. Princes Park should be developed to a pure AFL stadium, not a multi-purpose stadium. There are options to develop.

Live the dream! :smile:


That is a beautiful dream Mossy.Its one i share with you,and despite the doubters,i shall forever be hopefull.If that dream is fullfilled,we shall return to that indominatable force we once were.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:32 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
I want to move to Primces as much as the next person but without multi level parking that can accomodate 5000+ vehicles it will never happen.... building a multi level car park will cost big money and the tarrifs will be huge..and unlike the parking at Etihad which is used on a daily basis; it will only be used once per week if lucky..... too hard unfortunately. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1654
What could PP be developed to hold 30-40K? we're talking games with interstate clubs only aren't we? Yes, some parking would be needed. But look around the area and think about the tens of thousands of people that make their way to melb uni and work everyday without their cars...either melb uni would be very interested in sharing some new car space, or else....aren't we the green club??! couldn't we aim to reduce supporter car use and BE that green club?? :lol:

Mossy makes an important point, and my point is also this: why not dream large, and why not say it loud? I'm concerned that the current board don't do so. The audaciousness of Pratt is behind us unfortunately, and we seem to still be looking for a new way of parading the confident Carlton to the world. We need it back!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:41 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
I think I can safely say that we all agree that we want Carlton to be a superpower again. In order to achieve our objective, I believe that if we control our ground, we can control our own destiny. If Carlton can control the ground, they can control the spectacle and therefore the gate receipts and the broadcast rights. I recall a media report that the AFL may be putting a value for the broadcast rights for the next agreement at about $1 Billion.

If Carlton's home ground is under the control of the owners of the MCG (that is, the MCG Trustees), I would have to assume that those owners discharge their responsibilities and duties that are in the best interests of the MCG, not necessarily Carlton (and properly so).

I believe that the MCG should be our home ground, as an interim measure, until such time we return to Princes Park. Princes Park should be developed to a pure AFL stadium, not a multi-purpose stadium. There are options to develop.

Live the dream! :smile:


The problem with dreams is that the REAL world is happening whilst you're dreaming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Steve_C7 wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
I think I can safely say that we all agree that we want Carlton to be a superpower again. In order to achieve our objective, I believe that if we control our ground, we can control our own destiny. If Carlton can control the ground, they can control the spectacle and therefore the gate receipts and the broadcast rights. I recall a media report that the AFL may be putting a value for the broadcast rights for the next agreement at about $1 Billion.

If Carlton's home ground is under the control of the owners of the MCG (that is, the MCG Trustees), I would have to assume that those owners discharge their responsibilities and duties that are in the best interests of the MCG, not necessarily Carlton (and properly so).

I believe that the MCG should be our home ground, as an interim measure, until such time we return to Princes Park. Princes Park should be developed to a pure AFL stadium, not a multi-purpose stadium. There are options to develop.

Live the dream! :smile:


The problem with dreams is that the REAL world is happening whilst you're dreaming.


"You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one"

-John Lennon :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:40 am
Posts: 448
With 2 new interstate teams coming in do you think the AFL is not worried about melbourne crowds?

Now I am not saying it will be at PP but there will be a small venue in Melbourne for financial reasons it will definately happen.

The point is either way we will know in the next year on where we stand.

In all honesty, I hope that the stars do allign because AFL is here to stay in a big way. Being a financial powerhouse is just as important as being a football powerhouse.

If the club wants both it should be pushing as hard as it can for a PP, MCG deal with generous rights to the AFL and other teams who play at. We turn a decent buck on all games played there but we are not greedy ... we do the Italian thing in us and wet our beak.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
I recall media announcements about 1 year ago, that there was a feasibility study undertaken by the AFL about the possibility of returning football to Princess Park. Does anyone know what the result of that study was?


The Executive Summary is probably still with Gillon McLachlan...it's probably not something that's going to happen.

* It would cost about $20 million to renovate to 'acceptable AFL boutique ground' standards.
* There is a lack of suitable public transport and no car parking.

Carlton, North Melbourne and the Bulldogs would love it of course. The Roos and Dogs contract with Etihad has already expired, so they'd love to play their games against interstate clubs there.

At the end of the 2008, Carlton asked the MCG to help buy the club out of its Docklands contract but the MCG refused.


Not that it's any of their business, but I doubt the other clubs would be too happy with the knowledge that Carlton would profit to the tune of $400,000 a game at Princes Park. The larger crowd drawing games would be played at the MCG. I for one would be willing to sit in the Legends Stand with the sun directly in my eyes to see this come to fruition.


Hi Doc, could you please elaborate further as to why in the Executive Summary the Report states that there "is a lack of suitable public transport and no car parking", given that it is my understanding that at Princess Park, there is:
(1) a train line direct to Flinders Street, and a train station which is a 5 minute walk from Princes Park;
(2) Tram Lines (and a line switch section) next to the ground direct to Flinders Street, along Royal Parade; and
(3) Acres of Parkland to hold enough car parking space along the surrounding grounds; and
(4) Scope for a bus service to Parliament Station and Flinders Street; and
(5) Roads direct to City Link and therefore the Airport; and
(6) Princes Park only being 5 minutes from the City.

I look forward to receiving your thoughts. Thanks. :smile:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
Regardless of the arguments for and against, Princes Park will never happen because the Melbourne City council and residents won't let it happen.

We need to play 11 home games at the MCG and be entrenched there. It's the perfect ground to be our home ground, and we can strike a financially sound deal. I cannot see how the MCC would not want us as a full time tenant.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 16877
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
(3) Acres of Parkland to hold enough car parking space along the surrounding grounds; and

I look forward to receiving your thoughts. Thanks. :smile:


There's your big one there.

1. Community Sport. Parking on a Saturday arvo when you have cricket and/or soccer being played is a bit of a nightmare and these are all run by Melbourne City Council and/or Parks Victoria.

2. Residents. The residents wouldn't allow it, and are probably the main reason the place it'll never be a stadium used for AFL matches.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
(3) Acres of Parkland to hold enough car parking space along the surrounding grounds; and

I look forward to receiving your thoughts. Thanks. :smile:


There's your big one there.

1. Community Sport. Parking on a Saturday arvo when you have cricket and/or soccer being played is a bit of a nightmare and these are all run by Melbourne City Council and/or Parks Victoria.

2. Residents. The residents wouldn't allow it, and are probably the main reason the place it'll never be a stadium used for AFL matches.


The parking does clash with weekend day amateur sports, But surely there wouls be a night/twilight timeslot when it would be available.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3921
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
get rid of the hacks wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
(3) Acres of Parkland to hold enough car parking space along the surrounding grounds; and

I look forward to receiving your thoughts. Thanks. :smile:


There's your big one there.

1. Community Sport. Parking on a Saturday arvo when you have cricket and/or soccer being played is a bit of a nightmare and these are all run by Melbourne City Council and/or Parks Victoria.

2. Residents. The residents wouldn't allow it, and are probably the main reason the place it'll never be a stadium used for AFL matches.






The parking does clash with weekend day amateur sports, But surely there wouls be a night/twilight timeslot when it would be available.


But then the night fixture would be least agreeable to the residents due to the noise... Can't see it happening.

Maybe it could be used more for Nab cup/ challenge


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
(3) Acres of Parkland to hold enough car parking space along the surrounding grounds; and

I look forward to receiving your thoughts. Thanks. :smile:


There's your big one there.

1. Community Sport. Parking on a Saturday arvo when you have cricket and/or soccer being played is a bit of a nightmare and these are all run by Melbourne City Council and/or Parks Victoria.

2. Residents. The residents wouldn't allow it, and are probably the main reason the place it'll never be a stadium used for AFL matches.



Thanks Doc. Your comments raise some very interesting issues. My thoughts are:

I can recall that East Melbourne residents have voiced their concerns in the past with the MCC about the use of the MCG public parklands for MCG car parking purposes. I stand to be corrected, but it is my understanding that the MCG parklands are not owned by the MCG. The MCG parklands can be used by all members of the public, including East Melbourne residents for other purposes such as picnics. Therefore, in the case of Princes Park, it seems to me that both CFC's interests could co-exist with the interests of the Carlton residents and the sporting clubs by mutual agreement. I would like to suggest that this issue could be solved at a government/political level through dialogue by the CFC and/or the AFL.

I also stand to be corrected, but Carlton residents do not own the Princes Park public parkland. Such parkland has to be shared with all local interests, including the CFC, who have been situated at Princes Park for over 100 years. A mutual arrangement could be sorted out by all interests, if there was a will. Would you agree?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:42 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8604
Not a hope in the world of playing twilight or night footy at Princes Park.

You need lights :idea:

The residents would never allow it. Their kids would not be able to go to sleep

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:59 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
We'd all love for it to happen, but anyone even suggesting Princes Park as a home ground facility for matches in future is delusional. It's done.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 721 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 37  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BluesRockMyWorld and 87 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group