Captain Dan wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
If Kouta was fit, we would have won in 2000.
So the choice is clear.
I think we would have won the flag in 2001 aswell. We were hunting Richmond in the second half of the Semi, Kouta goes down with a knee, we lose by 11 points. We would have played Brisbane the next week, who we were more than capable of beating (having smashed them by 74 points earlier in the year I think it was), and then Essendon* in the Grand Final (who we also beat twice that season). We may have finished 5th that year and looked a bit flakey at times, but we were closer to the top than people gave us credit for.
We needed to get top 4 that year, but the infamous tanking match when Hird was mysteriously on the bench against Richmond with the game in the balance in round 22 2001 put paid to that.
That Richmond final is an abomination of history. Never before have I been at a game when we were 7 points down in the 3rd quarter knowing we couldn't win. We kicked ourselves out of the game before Kouta went down. I will never forget Richmond supporters cheering him go down.
FWIW - Us v Essendon* 1995 - We had a better midfield and defence, they had a better forward line. Ruck probably neither here nor there for either side.
So in conclusion - us.
Who was more dominant throughout their respective seasons - Essendon*, better percentage and lost 1 less game.