cimm1979 wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Or Cimm, there's option C:
The administration has several proposals and plans they're are developing, and this is one of a number of metrics they are using to sift through and validate said proposals and plans.
Do people stop to let the oxygen hit their brain before they spout comments any more?
Not often,.
Jimmae, what is new on the face of the football world that our club would learn from talking to a selected group of members.?
As proffessional administrators surely they would be aware of what irks members and what it takes to run a succesful club. There are studies up the wazoo of what it takes to turn things around. If the club wants it can get professional advice from people who have had similar experiences running other codes or organisations around the world.
Will they, no.
Would they ask for your opinion or mine on weekly team selections and tactics, NO, and nor should they. The membership are ill equiped to make any recommendations on how to solve problems and by running everything by the membership before you implement anything you just slow the process down.
It's a recipie for a whinge festival . Bottom up management was failed process of the 80's and 90's and hopefully will not be returning anytime soon.
They're not asking for your opinion on how they should do their job... it's not an open free for all (any survey that has an area for "additional comments" is mostly for show).
They've tailored the survey to gain answers to build further metrics that they want clarified. That's it. Answer the survey honestly, and you're providing data for the club to help with their existing decision making process.
To ignore or pretend to appease the members/customers/voters is tantamount to professional suicide, no matter your position in the world.
Cimm, you strike me as a decent bloke who puts a bit thought into his opinions, but you're bucking that trend with this effort.