Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:17 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:41 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 184
Is there really THAT much difference between our current situation and Geelong's of 2006?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:43 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
Yes. Geelong went on to win some premierships. Will we?

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:47 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Geelong of 2006 had made the previous two finals series losing to the Lions in the Prelim of 2004 and losing that memorable final to Sydney in 2005. They were a few points away from a GF in 2004 and well on the way in 2005 when they lost to the eventual premiers. We are yet to win a final in around 9 years so no I don't see the comparison at all TBH.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 184
Both teams lost a close final after leading by plenty
Both teams came out next year and delivered well under expectations after looking the goods at the start of the year.
Both teams employed Leading Teams around their respective time periods.
Bomber Thompson looked gone for all money at the end of 06.

Geelong came from further back and arguably with a less talented list at the time (still had the likes of Spriggs, Matt McCarthy, David Johnson, Tenace still getting regular games). I'm not 100% sure Ratten is the right person for the job any more than anyone else here, but I think it's an irrelevant question whilst Sticks is at the helm.

Lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater here, and demand for a full independent review of the football department. Still a fair few remnants from the bad old days around the place (Teague and Lappin surely gone at the end of the year), and things can certainly change for the better. Can anyone name one player on our list who is playing above themselves/their ability at this point in time?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:58 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
Geelong sat down and asked itself the really hard questions - will we?

How long will this presidency and its lack of accountability continue?

When will we decide to do what it takes to make the journey, not take the shortcuts we think will speed up the journey?

I hope Doc is right and a new president will come along next year - this year is shot but I want a new powerful club with a powerful, inclusive vision, to start asking itself the hard questions something, I think, we have not yet done properly, despite all the shite of the last decade.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:02 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 184
Certainly didn't happen overnight though. This was from round 4 in 2007 - http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/chapp ... 1113436723

Change the club name and theres not much difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:25 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
I'm not sure what Leading Teams actually does beside have a "confrontational" round table, but does employing groups such as this actually deflect the need for Ratten to show leadership; to stamp his imprimatur, viz a viz, by dropping players, etc.

He seems to show little strength of leadership by referring to stats to disguise obvious deficiencies; failing to drop key players, motivating a team to actually start a game from the first quarter etc etc.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Wild Blue Yonder wrote:
I'm not sure what Leading Teams actually does beside have a "confrontational" round table, but does employing groups such as this actually deflect the need for Ratten to show leadership; to stamp his imprimatur, viz a viz, by dropping players, etc.

He seems to show little strength of leadership by referring to stats to disguise obvious deficiencies; failing to drop key players, motivating a team to actually start a game from the first quarter etc etc.


I dare say Ratts Sticks et al exhausted all their leadership capabilities on these gen-Yers before they resorted to Leading Teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:31 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Ok, so Ratten needs his arse kicking and sent to the room of mirrors for a good hard look.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:11 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
TheSilentLurkerType wrote:
Certainly didn't happen overnight though. This was from round 4 in 2007 - http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/chapp ... 1113436723

Change the club name and theres not much difference.


Nah, the difference is that no player or coach at Carlton would come out swinging like that unfortunately.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:18 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
missnaut wrote:
TheSilentLurkerType wrote:
Certainly didn't happen overnight though. This was from round 4 in 2007 - http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/chapp ... 1113436723

Change the club name and theres not much difference.


Nah, the difference is that no player or coach at Carlton would come out swinging like that unfortunately.


My thoughts exactly. Chapman is a leader, not afraid to bruise a few sensitive egos to get to the right result.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:20 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
TheSilentLurkerType wrote:
Is there really THAT much difference between our current situation and Geelong's of 2006?


Are you trying to say Ratts is rooting Setanta's missus?

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
TheSilentLurkerType wrote:
Both teams lost a close final after leading by plenty
Both teams came out next year and delivered well under expectations after looking the goods at the start of the year.
Both teams employed Leading Teams around their respective time periods.
Bomber Thompson looked gone for all money at the end of 06.

Both brought in an injured prone and underperforming ruckman who was written off and bagged everyone.

Both have average tall forwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35897
Location: Half back flank
Both coaches were assistants under Pagan :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:13 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 381
Location: Melbourne
If you are comparing a very talented team of footballers to ours, you are seriously delusional.

They had Thompson in 2006.

They had few round 1 draft picks.

They have the mental capacity then and now. No comparison.

That statment sounds like a Ratten clutching at straws statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:45 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Geelong were far more advanced in 2006 than we are now. Geelong of 2006 was more like the Doggies of 2007, good side losing their way. Or even Hawthorn of 2009 early 2010.

I however don't know the future like Blueman, so can't say whether we will win the flag next year. I don't think we will though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
TheSilentLurkerType wrote:
Certainly didn't happen overnight though. This was from round 4 in 2007 - http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/chapp ... 1113436723

Change the club name and theres not much difference.



Have to say I agree. Especially with this quote...

Quote:
"It is something we are going to have to change as a side. You just can't be happy playing and getting your money and having a good lifestyle or whatever it is.

"You have got to go out there and do everything you can to win. You have got blokes like Darren Milburn Ryan Houlihan, who has been here for 13 or 14 years, who hasn't won one (premiership) and you hear him say the culture is still the same.


If Kade Simpson, as an example, came out in the media and said the above I would be over the moon.

Until the players get it, they won't get it. The fire has to come from within.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:39 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 184
linchpin wrote:
If you are comparing a very talented team of footballers to ours, you are seriously delusional.

They had Thompson in 2006.

They had few round 1 draft picks.

They have the mental capacity then and now. No comparison.

That statment sounds like a Ratten clutching at straws statement.


Doesn't even make sense in the slightest.

Thompson in 2006 was as good as cooked, same as what Knights/Ratten are now. Over-reliance on Kent Kingsley, Cameron Ling was apparently well overweight and refused to get off the beer/parma diet, Ablett was a soft outside receiver, Mooney was in the same situation Waite was in that he couldn't go a few weeks without getting rubbed out for undisciplined acts. Steven King was captain by default, and didn't really want the job.

They had few round 1 draft picks, we did. So my point being, is that are we any further back than what Geelong were, given they essentially had a less talented list than what we did?

The age breakdown of their list is very similiar to ours. Milburn and Sanderson were their vets, Scotland and Houlihan ours. After that, it falls away drastically to blokes around the 80-100 game mark.

Bring on 2011, as long as it brings the hard facts with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:36 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
and bring on 31 more games experience.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Question.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:42 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
TheSilentLurkerType wrote:
linchpin wrote:
If you are comparing a very talented team of footballers to ours, you are seriously delusional.

They had Thompson in 2006.

They had few round 1 draft picks.

They have the mental capacity then and now. No comparison.

That statment sounds like a Ratten clutching at straws statement.


Doesn't even make sense in the slightest.

Thompson in 2006 was as good as cooked, same as what Knights/Ratten are now. Over-reliance on Kent Kingsley, Cameron Ling was apparently well overweight and refused to get off the beer/parma diet, Ablett was a soft outside receiver, Mooney was in the same situation Waite was in that he couldn't go a few weeks without getting rubbed out for undisciplined acts. Steven King was captain by default, and didn't really want the job.

They had few round 1 draft picks, we did. So my point being, is that are we any further back than what Geelong were, given they essentially had a less talented list than what we did?

The age breakdown of their list is very similiar to ours. Milburn and Sanderson were their vets, Scotland and Houlihan ours. After that, it falls away drastically to blokes around the 80-100 game mark.

Bring on 2011, as long as it brings the hard facts with it.


You rekindled my hope with this :thumbsup:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group