which two would you want for the next 10 years??

Ummm... This is a hard one

not sure everyone would agree with you

would hopes its gibbs n murph

I'd rather have Judd, Ablett, Hodge, and Hayes.

And while we're at it throw in Barassi, Skilton, Dyer, and Williams.

They're all as realistic as Trengove, Scully, and Watts.

Carlton only ever had the option to pick Murphy, and Gibbs, so this thread is pointless.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED

its obviously a non-confrontational way to say "do you think scully n trengove will end up being better than murphy and gibbs" who by the way seem to be going backwards

Here is something a little more confrontational.

_________________
dane's trolling again

Gibbs, Yarran, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson & Lucas >>>>> Frawley, Trengove, Scully, Grimes, Morton & Watts

Gibbs, Yarran, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson, Lucas & J. Trengove >>> Sculley, Morton, Grimes, Watts, Trengove, Jurrah, Jones etc

Jackson Trengove was taken with pick 22; the only pick Carlton had before 22 was 6, which we used on Yarran.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED

..krooz not make the cut..??..

..obviously you'd pick proven performance and durability over potential..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..

Trengove & Scully >> Murphy & Gibbs

Take your glasses off people.

_________________
Lawrence Lawrence, The man who knows all the rackets and all the racketeers!

get stuffed.

_________________
dane's trolling again

Great argument champ

_________________
Lawrence Lawrence, The man who knows all the rackets and all the racketeers!

murphy and gibbs are so over rated by us, one is a down hill skier and the other is as soft as butter , trengrove and scully will be miles ahead in 2-3 years time.

+1

_________________
Lawrence Lawrence, The man who knows all the rackets and all the racketeers!

They weren't like that two years ago.

nick, 2 years ago i reckon gibbs was softer then he is now and he is still soft, maybe im a bit harsh on murphy bc of todays game but when things get tough he goes missing, its like alot of our players when its hard and tough we go missing, shits me and we will never win a premiership with so many uninterested players.
i honestly think trengrove and scully will be better then murphy and gibbs, i think watts will be a good player aswell but i also reckon kruezer will be the best of the lot, he will donimate games , just cant see gibbs and murphy doin that.

25 to Murphy, 24 to Gibbs and 28 to Judd yet we still got thumped?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch

all at around 50% effective

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah)

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.

You can't see Murphy dominating games?

The guy only started running again in late Jan. I think.

And six weeks of average to poor form has turned Gibbs into a spud.

Fickle.