Ummm... This is a hard one
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=28358 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | P.P Blues [ Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
which two would you want for the next 10 years?? |
|
| Author: | bax [ Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Ummm... This is a hard one
|
|
| Author: | P.P Blues [ Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
not sure everyone would agree with you would hopes its gibbs n murph |
|
| Author: | Lurker Blue [ Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
I'd rather have Judd, Ablett, Hodge, and Hayes. And while we're at it throw in Barassi, Skilton, Dyer, and Williams. They're all as realistic as Trengove, Scully, and Watts. Carlton only ever had the option to pick Murphy, and Gibbs, so this thread is pointless. |
|
| Author: | P.P Blues [ Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
its obviously a non-confrontational way to say "do you think scully n trengove will end up being better than murphy and gibbs" who by the way seem to be going backwards |
|
| Author: | dane [ Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Here is something a little more confrontational. 
|
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Gibbs, Yarran, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson & Lucas >>>>> Frawley, Trengove, Scully, Grimes, Morton & Watts |
|
| Author: | THIRIODIS [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Gibbs, Yarran, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson, Lucas & J. Trengove >>> Sculley, Morton, Grimes, Watts, Trengove, Jurrah, Jones etc |
|
| Author: | Lurker Blue [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Jackson Trengove was taken with pick 22; the only pick Carlton had before 22 was 6, which we used on Yarran. |
|
| Author: | Big Kahuna Boot [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
..krooz not make the cut..??.. ..obviously you'd pick proven performance and durability over potential.. |
|
| Author: | FlipMode2 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Trengove & Scully >> Murphy & Gibbs Take your glasses off people. |
|
| Author: | dane [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
FlipMode2 wrote: Trengove & Scully >> Murphy & Gibbs Take your glasses off people. get stuffed.
|
|
| Author: | FlipMode2 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
dane wrote: FlipMode2 wrote: Trengove & Scully >> Murphy & Gibbs Take your glasses off people. get stuffed.Great argument champ 
|
|
| Author: | blueboys101 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
murphy and gibbs are so over rated by us, one is a down hill skier and the other is as soft as butter , trengrove and scully will be miles ahead in 2-3 years time. |
|
| Author: | FlipMode2 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
blueboys101 wrote: murphy and gibbs are so over rated by us, one is a down hill skier and the other is as soft as butter , trengrove and scully will be miles ahead in 2-3 years time. +1 |
|
| Author: | Nick [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
blueboys101 wrote: murphy and gibbs are so over rated by us, one is a down hill skier and the other is as soft as butter , trengrove and scully will be miles ahead in 2-3 years time. They weren't like that two years ago. |
|
| Author: | blueboys101 [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
nick, 2 years ago i reckon gibbs was softer then he is now and he is still soft, maybe im a bit harsh on murphy bc of todays game but when things get tough he goes missing, its like alot of our players when its hard and tough we go missing, shits me and we will never win a premiership with so many uninterested players. i honestly think trengrove and scully will be better then murphy and gibbs, i think watts will be a good player aswell but i also reckon kruezer will be the best of the lot, he will donimate games , just cant see gibbs and murphy doin that. |
|
| Author: | Effes [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
25 to Murphy, 24 to Gibbs and 28 to Judd yet we still got thumped? |
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
Effes wrote: 25 to Murphy, 24 to Gibbs and 28 to Judd yet we still got thumped? all at around 50% effective |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gibbs, Murphy, Trengove, Scully, Watts... |
blueboys101 wrote: nick, 2 years ago i reckon gibbs was softer then he is now and he is still soft, maybe im a bit harsh on murphy bc of todays game but when things get tough he goes missing, its like alot of our players when its hard and tough we go missing, shits me and we will never win a premiership with so many uninterested players. i honestly think trengrove and scully will be better then murphy and gibbs, i think watts will be a good player aswell but i also reckon kruezer will be the best of the lot, he will donimate games , just cant see gibbs and murphy doin that. You can't see Murphy dominating games?  The guy only started running again in late Jan. I think. And six weeks of average to poor form has turned Gibbs into a spud. Fickle. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|