Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:04 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:52 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Antigua
Why?




Why do they hate us?






:sad:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
No idea mon.

Check out this audio:

"Chris Yarran! Go away!" :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:24 pm
Posts: 420
This "umpires hates x team" is rubbish.

Umpires call it how they see it, they dont favour teams. They are professionals and get analysed extensively on each performance, and get paid very well for each game, so why would they risk it all by doing something like favouring certain teams? Any fans who seriously believe that umpires go out there and favour certain teams over others are deluded.

For the record, Carlton rank 11th in the league for free kicks for and 4th for least free kicks against. Not nearly as bad as some teams.

The "blaming umpires" after a loss excuse is one of my biggest pet hates in football and unfortunately Carlton fans seem to be the worst at it :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
The thing with the umpiring last night is that aside from a holding the ball against Andrew Walker - you could argue that the umpire made the correct call every time...albeit 'tiggy touchwood' ones. Brisbane got a few shockers against them too - it's just what you've got to expect under Geischen and the first game back after they've been dragged across the coals by most 'C' grade journos in Australia.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19421
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Ads wrote:
For the record, Carlton rank 11th in the league for free kicks for and 4th for least free kicks against. Not nearly as bad as some teams.

The "blaming umpires" after a loss excuse is one of my biggest pet hates in football and unfortunately Carlton fans seem to be the worst at it :roll:


One of my biggest pet hates is supporters referring to the free kick count when discussing the quality/shitness of the umpiring.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Ads wrote:
This "umpires hates x team" is rubbish.

Umpires call it how they see it, they dont favour teams. They are professionals and get analysed extensively on each performance, and get paid very well for each game, so why would they risk it all by doing something like favouring certain teams? Any fans who seriously believe that umpires go out there and favour certain teams over others are deluded.

For the record, Carlton rank 11th in the league for free kicks for and 4th for least free kicks against. Not nearly as bad as some teams.

The "blaming umpires" after a loss excuse is one of my biggest pet hates in football and unfortunately Carlton fans seem to be the worst at it :roll:


They may or may not "hate" teams (although some umpires seem far more blind to frees for us than others), but they definitely do favour certain players.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:45 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Actually dont mind the umpires going a bit nuts on the fifties. Particularly the ones against people creeping over the mark. The heavy zoning, high pressure teams have been creeping over the mark for a couple of years now in a bid to slow teams up so they can set up.

If umps are instructed to keep an eye on it then the AFL are aware of this cheating so hopefully teams like the Hawks, Saints and magpies suffer the most.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:38 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
I'd also like them to crack down on the "Harry O'Brien" manouvre. You know, where he shepherds the man on the mark. I noticed last night that hawthorn does it too.

I don't care if it's legal - it just LOOKS so illegal and is surely not within the spirit of the game.

I wish our coaching staff would be the first to come up with an innovative way of countering it and then roll it out in the next Filth game.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:10 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
moshe25 wrote:
I'd also like them to crack down on the "Harry O'Brien" manouvre. You know, where he shepherds the man on the mark. I noticed last night that hawthorn does it too.

I don't care if it's legal - it just LOOKS so illegal and is surely not within the spirit of the game.

I wish our coaching staff would be the first to come up with an innovative way of countering it and then roll it out in the next Filth game.


Agree. Also the Milne use of the umpire as shepherd, where the umpire calls a mark and holds the man on the mark, and is instructing the player minding the mark, when the little maggot runs around and plays on, usually putting the umpire between him and the player minding the mark, so the player minding the mark has zero chance of getting to Milne. If he tries, then he will either collect the umpire, or be pinged 50m for going over the mark. Umpire-sanctioned cheating.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:17 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
I'd also like them to crack down on the "Harry O'Brien" manouvre. You know, where he shepherds the man on the mark. I noticed last night that hawthorn does it too.

I don't care if it's legal - it just LOOKS so illegal and is surely not within the spirit of the game.

I wish our coaching staff would be the first to come up with an innovative way of countering it and then roll it out in the next Filth game.


Agree. Also the Milne use of the umpire as shepherd, where the umpire calls a mark and holds the man on the mark, and is instructing the player minding the mark, when the little maggot runs around and plays on, usually putting the umpire between him and the player minding the mark, so the player minding the mark has zero chance of getting to Milne. If he tries, then he will either collect the umpire, or be pinged 50m for going over the mark. Umpire-sanctioned cheating.


Yeah, Gehrig used to do it too. Surely the ump should just blow his whistle and raise his arm and tell 'em to go back over the mark till HE (the ump) gets out of the way.

And with the O'Brien thing, why can't O'Brien's opponent just stand with him (or in fact between him and the man on the mark)?

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:56 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:33 pm
Posts: 208
The Giesch. nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more.

_________________
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on". -Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
I've said it before. The AFL need to throw some of their millions at umpiring, attract some former players. Only then will the standard increase.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 7:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 1475
Location: Melbourne
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
I'd also like them to crack down on the "Harry O'Brien" manouvre. You know, where he shepherds the man on the mark. I noticed last night that hawthorn does it too.

I don't care if it's legal - it just LOOKS so illegal and is surely not within the spirit of the game.

I wish our coaching staff would be the first to come up with an innovative way of countering it and then roll it out in the next Filth game.


Agree. Also the Milne use of the umpire as shepherd, where the umpire calls a mark and holds the man on the mark, and is instructing the player minding the mark, when the little maggot runs around and plays on, usually putting the umpire between him and the player minding the mark, so the player minding the mark has zero chance of getting to Milne. If he tries, then he will either collect the umpire, or be pinged 50m for going over the mark. Umpire-sanctioned cheating.


Umpires should be standing a metre behind the man on the mark to avoid it happening. No reason they can't line the player up standing just behind the player on the mark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:58 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
The thing with the umpiring last night is that aside from a holding the ball against Andrew Walker - you could argue that the umpire made the correct call every time...albeit 'tiggy touchwood' ones. Brisbane got a few shockers against them too - it's just what you've got to expect under Geischen and the first game back after they've been dragged across the coals by most 'C' grade journos in Australia.


How can they go from the umpiring in our game, to the umpiring in the Hawks v Dogs game, where the whistle was barely blown all night. I saw one passage of play where there were 3 "in the backs" and two "held after disposing" in a 15 second passage of play, none of which were marginal, and none of which were called. I know they were very different intensity games but how can they justify being so inconsistent between matches (let along within them).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I've said it before. The AFL need to throw some of their millions at umpiring, attract some former players. Only then will the standard increase.


I reckon this idea has merit. What's the latest on Mark Fraser's progress?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
The idea of ex-players umpiring though may open up the whole argument of "he only paid them free kicks because he used to play for them" and so on. I think it's a reasonable idea, but there's no doubt this would come up.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
Amazing how one umpire only, could competently handle the game for over a century, now 3 can't.

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
umpiring is the least of our worries...

....id rather see our clanger rate reduced by half :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:22 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Ads wrote:
This "umpires hates x team" is rubbish.

Umpires call it how they see it, they dont favour teams. They are professionals and get analysed extensively on each performance, and get paid very well for each game, so why would they risk it all by doing something like favouring certain teams? Any fans who seriously believe that umpires go out there and favour certain teams over others are deluded.

For the record, Carlton rank 11th in the league for free kicks for and 4th for least free kicks against. Not nearly as bad as some teams.

The "blaming umpires" after a loss excuse is one of my biggest pet hates in football and unfortunately Carlton fans seem to be the worst at it :roll:


Spot on! When we win the umpire bashers disappear. It is not the umpires that decide the game it is the players. If we are good enough the umpire is irrelevant, as it should be.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Umps.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
We won on the weekend, but the umpires were still shit

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group