Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:02 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
This 'tactic' seems to polarise people. My stance:

It is a good, useful tactic but we perform it poorly

I think the intention of the tactic is correct. It lets us play the game on our terms and lets us control momentum. It is often the right thing to do.

BUT - I have several objections about how we do it:

1. The players stop running all too often when a teammate raises the ball. THIS IS WRONG! They need to run harder and harder to create the loose option. It is gut busting work, but if we don't run hard to create the loose man then a 50/50 contest at half back is the result - FAIL!

2. We creep backwards rather than forwards. The teams that do this well can 'creep' up the whole ground with short passes and gain position. We end up hemmed in at the back pocket kicking and hoping to a contest on D50. Again, this comes down to running to create the options that move the ball forward.


Basically, when the hands go up, the ball should slow down, but not the players. They need to RUN RUN RUN to create the loose man.

At the moment the hands go up and they all stand on the spot - no wonder the results aren't alwas great.

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:04 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
For me it's very simple.

The idea is to hold posession at the end of the qtr so we don't cough up a goal, correct?

Every week, we cough up at least two goals by doing this.

Any questions?

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 7:17 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
I actually think we've improved this area of our game substantially. We may have given the Saints 1 goals to Gram, but the rest of the time, although heart in your mouth stuff, we controlled play and moved the ball forward, whilst taking considerable time off the clock. Against Geelong we did the same thing for 2-3 mins at a time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 7:55 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I don't agree we always give up goals when we do this. I think it stands out when we do though.

Kicking backwards has its place, if you're trying to open up space on the other side of the ground. I don't like when we ignore options further up the ground to kick the ball 25m backwards. Basically what he said...

Quote:
2. We creep backwards rather than forwards. The teams that do this well can 'creep' up the whole ground with short passes and gain position. We end up hemmed in at the back pocket kicking and hoping to a contest on D50. Again, this comes down to running to create the options that move the ball forward.


PRO
- We're getting better at it

CON
- We really need the practice.

Glad to see we're working on it in Round 7 rather than trying to figure it out in a Prelim Final.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:04 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
I think we start it a little too early... there is some times 5 minutes (plus time on) on the clock when we start.... that's 1/4th of the quarter.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:05 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
Its simple, Simon, practice makes perfect. The team isn't as good as the top boys but they are getting better especially with Russell and Scotland controlling things. But it would be nice to see it go forwards a little more rather than consistently back.

And if Thornton is going to play, keep it out of his hands. If I see any more of his lollipops. :banghead:

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:15 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
Donstuie wrote:
For me it's very simple.

The idea is to hold posession at the end of the qtr so we don't cough up a goal, correct?

Every week, we cough up at least two goals by doing this.

Any questions?


I agree that we've coughed up too many goals doing it, but I think if we learn to use this tactic more effectively, it has massive upside (stop teams scoring against us in red time).

You can't be successful in modern footy until you can do the 'hands up' routine well. The good teams can go the whole ground and score in 'slow-mo', Collingwood did it to us a few times last week.

The main things are:
1. Run to create an option
2. Don't end up hemmed in at the back pocket (see point 1)
3. Don't be forced to kick to a 50-50 (see point 1)

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
simonverbeek wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
For me it's very simple.

The idea is to hold posession at the end of the qtr so we don't cough up a goal, correct?

Every week, we cough up at least two goals by doing this.

Any questions?


I agree that we've coughed up too many goals doing it, but I think if we learn to use this tactic more effectively, it has massive upside (stop teams scoring against us in red time).

You can't be successful in modern footy until you can do the 'hands up' routine well. The good teams can go the whole ground and score in 'slow-mo', Collingwood did it to us a few times last week.

The main things are:
1. Run to create an option
2. Don't end up hemmed in at the back pocket (see point 1)
3. Don't be forced to kick to a 50-50 (see point 1)


The only way I can see this working is if the players are told to never kick it in the defensive 50 - EVER!

If the only option is to go back into the D50, kick to the pack on the boundary line. Simple instruction. Anyone whjo disobeys is sacked and put to death (unless it's Juddy).

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
What they should do, is change it so 'ball in air' actually means 'we're about to go crazy', would fool the opp big time LOL

(just make sure all players get the Memo though)

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
We will be loving it as a tactic in the 2012 granny when we take the sting out of an attempted magpie comeback 10 mins into the last.

Practice makes perfect.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:37 pm
Posts: 1932
I like the idea because in the past instead of trying to slow things down a bit and take a deep breathe we have continued to play the only game plan that we came in with. Thus, turning it over and leaking a lot more goals late in quarters. I would love to see our stats of red time goals this year compared to other years at seasons end.

_________________
Koperek.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:27 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
club29 wrote:
We will be loving it as a tactic in the 2012 granny when we take the sting out of an attempted magpie comeback 10 mins into the last.

Practice makes perfect.


Wouldn't it be frustrating doing it when were 108 points up with the record grand final margin in sight? :thumbsup:

As for the tactic, when we stop noticing it as a problem is the time we have officially arrived.

Imagine if we tried it between 2002-07 :hitcomputer:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 7:14 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Anyone thinks a team can go gangbusters from start to finish is kidding themselves.

Slowing down the game is smart.

Doing it well is smarter. This we need to finesse.

Having said that, none of us know what the signal means, so we need to chill about because it might mean something other than what you all think.

Yazz stated that he and the boys have hand signals to communicate, so why isn't conceivable that the hand in the air holding the ball by a certain player, means something?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 7:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
About 18 months ago we held the ball up against Geelong and their coaches box immediately knew they would win the game. I think we have come a long way since then.

I think we know that at some point in a final or a GF, we are going to have to execute this to regain control of a match, or win it at the death. I think there is a deliberate strategy to practice it as much as possible under match conditions in the home & away season so we get better at it. And I think it's working.

I think the view expressed by commentators that our style of play means we could use a breather at the end of the quarter is probably correct. And I would rather our boys come out at the start of the quarter where true momentum is won and lost breathing fire, and ease up at the end of the quarter if that's what it takes to go hard early.

And I think as frustrating as it is to watch when we stuff it up and conceed 1-2 time-on goals (I hate it), people should bear in mind how many time-on goals we were conceeding before we started trialing this (i.e stacks).

On balance, I think we're better for it. Perhaps it just needs fine tuning so we sometimes roll the dice and go for the kill when 1-2 more goals would ice the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 8:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
I reckon the solution is to come up with a new signal...no more holding the ball over the head....as opposition teams know what this means and immediately plan for it...we should have a new signal for every game...

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 8:39 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:47 am
Posts: 814
simonverbeek wrote:
2. We creep backwards rather than forwards. The teams that do this well can 'creep' up the whole ground with short passes and gain position. We end up hemmed in at the back pocket kicking and hoping to a contest on D50. Again, this comes down to running to create the options that move the ball forward.

Agree with this.

We seem to get forced into the back pocket and then turn it over.

Collingwood is probably the best team at slowing the game down, keeping possession and still moving the ball forward. They seem to spread better than most teams and work the ball up the wings.

We are getting better at this, but we still have a way to go. If we can master this area of our game, combined with our ability to play fast paced offensive footy, we will have really come a long way towards number 17.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 9:27 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 202
Here is a simple idea for a new "strategy".

Put he ball under one armpit and stretch out to the side with the other arm.

Then stack the side of the ground closest to the ball (preferably with several tall marking targets close together to prevent the other teAm marking the ball) and kick it SO IT AN BE MARKED TO THE TALL PLAYERS.

Then we have a zone which we can control.

Move the ball forward so a score against us cannot be made.

When in doubt or if control of the ball is lost, use the boundary line as your re-start point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I don't agree we always give up goals when we do this. I think it stands out when we do though.

Kicking backwards has its place, if you're trying to open up space on the other side of the ground. I don't like when we ignore options further up the ground to kick the ball 25m backwards. Basically what he said...

Quote:
2. We creep backwards rather than forwards. The teams that do this well can 'creep' up the whole ground with short passes and gain position. We end up hemmed in at the back pocket kicking and hoping to a contest on D50. Again, this comes down to running to create the options that move the ball forward.


PRO
- We're getting better at it

CON
- We really need the practice.

Glad to see we're working on it in Round 7 rather than trying to figure it out in a Prelim Final.


You've got the right idea TBB. :thumbsup:

Keep you eyes on the prize.

We are developing and I hope we peak for the month of September.

Nevertheless we are holding up play well most of the time.
We are also doing well against the competition with our kick ins too.
I reckon we should slow it down at times to get our breath back.
You have to remember we are exerting a lot of energy with our gut busting running and surges forward. We are young.
The effort required to kick 20 goals and defend the other way to hold them to 9 goals warrants some time out for the players.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 9:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
Juddanaught09 wrote:
simonverbeek wrote:
2. We creep backwards rather than forwards. The teams that do this well can 'creep' up the whole ground with short passes and gain position. We end up hemmed in at the back pocket kicking and hoping to a contest on D50. Again, this comes down to running to create the options that move the ball forward.

Agree with this.

We seem to get forced into the back pocket and then turn it over.

Collingwood is probably the best team at slowing the game down, keeping possession and still moving the ball forward. They seem to spread better than most teams and work the ball up the wings.

We are getting better at this, but we still have a way to go. If we can master this area of our game, combined with our ability to play fast paced offensive footy, we will have really come a long way towards number 17.


Good points.

Malthouse is the biggest user of midfield rotations by far.
He has his reasons, let alone keeping his players fresh for 100% of the time they take the field.
I reckon those rotations are the key to the Pies having players break out/ spread their leads free of defenders consistently.
There must be something in that; after all it's always one of the 15 midfielders who are leading to receive the ball.
I'm sure they mix things up on the ground as much as they do off the bench to confuse.

We'll get them the next time.
As long as we get the ball first and run and break lines faster than they can zone (as we can), we'll get 'em.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 10:25 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 890
simonverbeek wrote:
This 'tactic' seems to polarise people. My stance:

It is a good, useful tactic but we perform it poorly

I think the intention of the tactic is correct. It lets us play the game on our terms and lets us control momentum. It is often the right thing to do.

BUT


We creep backwards rather than forwards. The teams that do this well can 'creep' up the whole ground with short passes and gain position. We end up hemmed in at the back pocket kicking and hoping to a contest on D50. Again, this comes down to running to create the options that move the ball forward.


Basically, when the hands go up, the ball should slow down, but not the players. They need to RUN RUN RUN to create the loose man.

At the moment the hands go up and they all stand on the spot - no wonder the results aren't alwas great.


Couldn't have said it better.....
The tactic works we just aren't using it properly.. and on Monday Night it was evident that we gave up plenty of ground when we went back!

_________________
Stay tuned We're in for a BUMPY ride


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Duked and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group