JohnM wrote:
It's actually pretty simple I think.
Because the entire playing list got pissed on a boat, not long after the club had to get rid of Fev for getting pissed at the Brownlow, the media and the general public see the club as having the problem. Because not one or two but three players got into trouble, and the whole playing list was on the boat.
But when Hurley bashes a taxi driver, and Stokes buys cocaine, and etc, etc... that's seen as individuals stuffing up, not a club culture at fault.
Now, if stokes was sprung buying and distributing coke at a BBQ where the whole Geelong list was there... they'd be going through an absolute shitstorm as a club. Right now, it's just Stokes who made a very bad decision.
We may see it as a subtle difference, but it's still a difference nonetheless. That's why when a certain carlton player got into trouble a couple of years back for a drinking incident, the club didn't get a pasting from the media... because it's just the one guy.
The media loves a good anthem. Whole list on 'booze cruise'... we really made it all too easy for them.
Agreed. Sure, we can take potshots at media organisations all we like because of their bias and itchy trigger fingers in destroying us (and it's true, their reporting of other club's incidents have been woefully inadequate), but it doesn't change the fact that the Carlton Football Club helped to set up their picnic basket and rug to begin with. Remember back to Fev's antics at the Brownlow, while the club righfully admitted to failing to deal with his behaviour, it was still seen as Fev's stupidity alone. But we had a team function where the leadership group were present, and multiple players made dicks of themselves while on the juice. This is the club failing. The fact that individuals from other clubs have commited worse crimes in no way makes what our players did any less stupid.