TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=26773 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Effes [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Additional change to Carlton list Quote: The Carlton Football Club has made an additional change to its list today, with Cameron Cloke delisted prior to the AFL’s second list lodgment deadline.
|
Author: | Wild Blue Yonder [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
good get effie. Well done Clokey - gave all to the best of your abilities. |
Author: | Shimmer [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Surprised but good move by Carlton. Frees up an extra spot on our list. I don't know if the Hun picked this up as they ran an article about not enough room on the list for Matt Maguire. Cloke was helpful at times but wasn't tall enough for ruck, not consistent enough up forward and looked lost whenever he went back. Thanks for your services. |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
All the best to Cameron at his new digs. |
Author: | Hornet [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
A player with limited ability but even so I would have thought Brad Fisher would go before him. Good luck Cameron Cloke... |
Author: | DocSherrin III [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Fisher is contracted for one more year. Cloke has been on peanuts since he arrived. |
Author: | Hornet [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Hornet wrote: A player with limited ability but even so I would have thought Brad Fisher would go before him. Good luck Cameron Cloke... Fisher is contracted for one more year. Cloke has been on peanuts since he arrived. I thought Cloke earned himself another year by playing the required amount of games this season? Either one for me anyway. |
Author: | Lurker Blue [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Hornet wrote: I thought Cloke earned himself another year by playing the required amount of games this season? Rumour is Cloke chose to forgo the extra year, so he can sign with Port. viewtopic.php?f=17&t=26695 |
Author: | Humpers [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
All the best Cameron - thanks for your efforts. |
Author: | Bluey44 [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
well played Cam, and Good Luck ! |
Author: | gerry atric [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Wow - the world turns full circle doesn't it. Who would have predicted that Setanta would be the one Ratts had in mind for a key forward post and Cloke would be the one delisted after THE incident in the pre season. Cloke was good value as a stand in, but had the same issues as at C'wood - too short for the ruck and too slow as a forward. I thought he would be ahead of Fish. Still if the rumours re Port are true then it might be win-win. He is not quite AFL standard but he gets another 3 years in the AFL probably and we get a spot on the list. Let's not waste it on another delisted player. Cloke was delisted and gave good battling service to us, but the reasons he was delisted initially are the same reasons he has been delisted by us. Hope we don't try for a bit of deja vu with Matt MaGuire. |
Author: | Lowey_47 [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
absolute workhorse. Will never forget the bicycle kick at my end at the wool n scabba... ![]() |
Author: | samblueboy [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Certain times I thought Cloke was going to be a decent player for Carlton. He did actually improve while with us, I suppose that's all you could ask. |
Author: | keogh [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Fisher should go before Cloke. Paid out Fev Stevo why not Fisher |
Author: | Kouta [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
keogh wrote: Fisher should go before Cloke. Paid out Fev Stevo why not Fisher No one will take Fisher. ![]() |
Author: | bondiblue [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Kouta wrote: keogh wrote: Fisher should go before Cloke. Paid out Fev Stevo why not Fisher No one will take Fisher. ![]() I think you're right. |
Author: | Juzzy [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
![]() |
Author: | Blue Beatle [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Hornet wrote: A player with limited ability but even so I would have thought Brad Fisher would go before him. couldn't agree more - but why would you delist cloke and keep fisher i would have thought that cloke leads well and kicks miles better than fisher, is a presence and is strong - can't fathom some decisions. maybe those who see carlton live eaxh week can enlighten me as we only see games on telly |
Author: | Donstuie [ Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Dr.SHERRIN wrote: Fisher is contracted for one more year.
|
Author: | Kouta [ Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Additional change to Carlton list (13/11) |
Blue Beatle wrote: Hornet wrote: A player with limited ability but even so I would have thought Brad Fisher would go before him. couldn't agree more - but why would you delist cloke and keep fisher i would have thought that cloke leads well and kicks miles better than fisher, is a presence and is strong - can't fathom some decisions. maybe those who see carlton live eaxh week can enlighten me as we only see games on telly Fisher's father isn't a Damir. Fisher isn't a bad egg. If we take Fisher, Cloke, Wiggins and Johnson off the list, we would have to replace them using picks 75, 91 and 107. I'd rather have Wiggins, Fisher and Johnson in our bottom six than the underdeveloped dregs you will draft that late. Apparently we'll be scraping the bottom of the barrel with picks 43 and 59, yet alone with even later picks. If Wiggins, Fisher and Johnson are rated higher than the available players and able to fill a need, it makes sense that they stay. Like it or not, Fisher will get a game next year. Even Geelong and St Kilda had hacks getting a game this year. So why wouldn't Fisher stay as a fall back solution ![]() Or should we play Tiller before he's ready ![]() Don't forget, Carlton will need three players to delist next year as we start picking at selection 18 to 20. ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |