Bentley

budzy · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am **Posts:** 8128

So was he elevated again due to Waiteys LTI?

brad2311 · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:46 pm

Belongs in TalkingPlayers

oh wait that lines been used :banghead:

Honestly dont see the value of him in the side just yet. That missed shepperd for Judd showed the inexperience

camel · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:48 pm

...rhythm ace.

Navy Blue Horse · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm **Posts:** 15848

brad2311 wrote:

That missed shepperd for Judd showed the inexperience

Yeah we should drop him....don't come back until you have more experience at senior level son :donk:

bosman · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:53 pm

brad2311 wrote:

Honestly dont see the value of him in the side just yet. That missed shepperd for Judd showed the inexperience

Don't like him, simple as that, never to play seniors again..... That shepherd and also another he missed, no excuse.

You don't need to be blessed with skills to do the 1%...

budzy · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am **Posts:** 8128

budzy wrote:

So was he elevated again due to Waiteys LTI?

?

The Normal One · **Joined:** Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm **Posts:** 20076

No idea who he was promoted for, but surely the paper work could be withdrawn and Ellard promoted?

Bentley isn't up to AFL.

bondiblue · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:03 pm

septembergurl · **Joined:** Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:20 pm **Posts:** 589

Can't all rookies play after round 11, as part of the gold coast concessions deal?

Orangewhip · **Joined:** Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am **Posts:** 6154

Well done kneejerkers.

Off the bench today, Bentley was effective and did his job with the limited time he had. Well done Ratts for keeping him on after the Judd mishap- however- JUDD CALLED FOR IT.

Where the Russell thread Richmondites?

jimmae · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:41 pm

septembergurl wrote:

Can't all rookies play after round 11, as part of the gold coast concessions deal?

Nup, just the one promotion.

Every time he is involved in a chain of possession, no matter how small his role, he finds a way to make things difficult for his team mates. Not up to scratch, get him out of there.

lara #25 · **Joined:** Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:54 am **Posts:** 96

i thought he was better than his hawthorn game. obviously made a few mistakes, one in particular gave freo an easy goal... BUT he has a bit of grunt and at least puts his head over the ball, which is something some of our players still fail to do. i think give him another chance and see how he goes, that way it can be decided whether to scrap him or not at the end of the year

Agro jr · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 3:04 pm **Posts:** 1007

He definatley does try and put his body in.

He actually does have a bit of experience about him, hes played 23 games which is a season of footy stretching over two clubs.

He's very gutsy and hard in and under, but I just dont understand what the point of him playing was?

Subiaco is...Big
Big means theres a lot of open spaces.
Open Spaces mean certain players can use there speed
Bentley doesnt have speed
Yarran does.

Why not give Yarran a go in his homestate on a big ground.

That's what we lacked today, we werent able to take advantage of the open spaces that Subi offers by selecting Bentley.

Teddy · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:12 pm

lara #25 wrote:

i thought he was better than his hawthorn game...

My five year olds Auskick game last week was better than Bentley's Hawthorn game.

Blue Beatle · **Posted:** Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:19 pm

Orangewhip wrote:

:clap:

Well done kneejerkers.

Off the bench today, Bentley was effective and did his job with the limited time he had. Well done Ratts for keeping him on after the Judd mishap- however- JUDD CALLED FOR IT.

yes but bently made no attempt to put a block on the player coming from behind to protect judd and give him a clear passage to goal- dumb footy. but then he wasn't the only carlton player who just watched after disposing of the ball by hand.

Blueboy_Dan · **Joined:** Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am **Posts:** 5245

I like this one better than our one

99prelim · **Joined:** Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm **Posts:** 3561

Orangewhip wrote:

:clap:

Well done kneejerkers.

Off the bench today, Bentley was effective and did his job with the limited time he had. Well done Ratts for keeping him on after the Judd mishap- however- JUDD CALLED FOR IT.

Where the Russell thread Richmondites?

probably gone missing......just like your credibility after calling Grigg a @#$% champion in the Pros and Cons thread. You're obviously very easily impressed.

jimmae · **Posted:** Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:11 am

budzy wrote:

So was he elevated again due to Waiteys LTI?

Sorry - no one's really addressed this. That's a possibility, or the round 11 auto-nomination.

Paperwork may have been put in for him to come up due to Walker's injury after Bentick returned also.

There should be opportunity for Garlett to be elevated again after Warnock resumes.

Nicko Carstairs · **Joined:** Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 am **Posts:** 629

Hmmm after just watching the game on Austar IQ (work) I hate to say it but IMHO he was not that bad. He stuffed up a couple of times (one really bad forward entry), but he played ok. Looked like a great game compared to his hawks game which was terrible. He was ok today. Some good aggresion at times. I agree with Orangewhip. Did his job.

Humpers · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm **Posts:** 4937

Do we really need him in the side?
It's like the dark days of Paganism all over again.

Bentley

Who is online