As for the criticism over the fence, he claims ignorance.

Does he hear it? "Not really. Maybe when you walk up the boundary line."

Does he take offence?

There's a long pause before he says: "No. They (supporters) don't know the structures, what role I've been given.

"Obviously, you want to be liked by everyone, but it's not going to happen because everyone sees things differently. I know if I've played a good game; if I've played a bad game, I know that, too.

Well the article sums up the 165+ pages on JR in one page.

JR knows his faults and continues to work on them.

Interesting that he thought he should've been dropped also, but the MC didn't do it a few times.

What is interesting? Why is interesting?

Is that a + or - for JR?
Is that a + or - for the MC?

Regards Cazzesman

I just found it interesting as to how the MC operates.

JR is still only a C grade player on our list, so if JR thinks he is struggling for form, how do the MC come to the decision to keep picking him? I would love to know the communicaton process, maybe the team player factor? maybe he had credits? maybe they simply wanted to see if he could play himself into form via the seniors instead of the Bullants?

I think the MC choosing not to drop him when he clearly felt that he should be dropped was more about the physch profile the MC has on him and what dropping would do to him upstairs.