| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Name Palyers to have played more than 50 Games - http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25023 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Dommie [ Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Name Palyers to have played more than 50 Games - |
I need input please? At work we are trying to come up with name(s) of player(s) that have played 50 or more games for the Blues ( Not in a priemership side) that maybe considered not up to standard, below par. Any Idea? |
|
| Author: | FlipMode2 [ Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Name Palyers to have played more than 50 Games - |
Blueseum |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Name Palyers to have played more than 50 Games - |
John Nichols has played more than 50 games and there's no way known he could break into the strong line up we have this weekend. |
|
| Author: | ianh [ Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Name Palyers to have played more than 50 Games - |
I may be missing something, but I can't find any list of 50 game players on Blueseum. They do have a list of players who have played 100 but less than 200 games at the club. Concentrating on players between 100-150 games who I can recall playing I could suggest these names: Simon Wiggins Ron De Iulio Anthony Franchina Darren Hulme all of whom played no more than than 110 games. But really apart maybe from Wigglers bigger critics could anyone say any of these guys were duds? Others in that 100-200 range who perhaps were lucky to get as many games as they did, but were by no means spuds, include Matthew Hogg (114), Justin Murphy (115), Peter McConville (140), Simon Beaumont (152), Glenn Manton (157) and Adrian Gleeson (176) but at some stage of their careers at least all of those guys unarguably were truly valuable members of the side. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|