TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Play of the Day
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24526		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Jarusa [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Play of the Day
I only got a chance to see the recording I had of the Essendon* game a couple of days ago.

The very last play of the day struck me straight away. It encapsulates in a short time what is good and bad in the team at the moment.

This is my poor effort at video editing to just highlight a few of the things that happened. This is not saying this play cost us the game (general poor play throughout the game did that). It is just provided to highlight a few little incidents both good and bad (and maybe generate some discussion :wink: ).

[youtube]yJ3t-XVieCA[/youtube]
Author:  kingkerna [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
nice effort Jars, although things do tend to look worse in slow-mo
Author:  Sydney Blue [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
Murphs handball to Gibbs - made him have to change stride - if it had gone in front of him instead of behind he would have had a clear run to goal

Also Stevens not blocking for Judd didn't effect the play as he unloaded the handball before he got there - still should have done it

Cloke is the biggest culprit for not blocking Fletchers run - if he had Judd would have had a clear shot on goal instead he have to break stride to step around Fletcher .


good shit have got any more
Author:  Wild Blue Yonder [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
I liked your chicken boning video more.
Author:  Jarusa [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
kingkerna wrote:
nice effort Jars, although things do tend to look worse in slow-mo


... and better!
Author:  samblueboy [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
Sydney Blue wrote:
Also Stevens not blocking for Judd didn't effect the play as he unloaded the handball before he got there - still should have done it


I think Judd's peripheral vision would have picked up the defender, Stevens had to do the bodyguard thing and it cost the team the chance for a memorable victory. Instead, we're here still sulking about it when we could have been saying, "what a great selfless thing to do...".
Author:  Taff [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
samblueboy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Also Stevens not blocking for Judd didn't effect the play as he unloaded the handball before he got there - still should have done it


I think Judd's peripheral vision would have picked up the defender, Stevens had to do the bodyguard thing and it cost the team the chance for a memorable victory. Instead, we're here still sulking about it when we could have been saying, "what a great selfless thing to do...".


Remember that the offender is immune from criticism because he is a class player and our VC. :razz:
Author:  samblueboy [ Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Play of the Day
Taff wrote:
samblueboy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Also Stevens not blocking for Judd didn't effect the play as he unloaded the handball before he got there - still should have done it


I think Judd's peripheral vision would have picked up the defender, Stevens had to do the bodyguard thing and it cost the team the chance for a memorable victory. Instead, we're here still sulking about it when we could have been saying, "what a great selfless thing to do...".


Remember that the offender is immune from criticism because he is a class player and our VC. :razz:


Sometimes the most talented of players should be saying WWWD (What Would WIGGINS Do).
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/