Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 8:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:16 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
This is going to be really interesting at the end of the season who will be going especially if Gartlett,Jacobs and Joseph all do well. There could be 3 players promoted,nearly sure Jacobs and Joseph would be. This would have make us delist 3 players. The club will want at least 4 picks in the draft,so that's 7 players who could get cut.

The thing is there 7 players on the list to be cut while not cutting the youngsters. I'm sure some people will put a couple of players who just signed a 2 year contract,but i don't think they have a similar contract to like Ackland. I just can't see that happening to Fisher and Anderson.

I guess some players might want to be traded who are not getting regular games as much as they did.

_________________
Bang Bang.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:58 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
It won't be that hard, there's still players on the list that don't deserve to be there and i would say enough to cover for any rookies to be promoted.

Next years cull will be interesting though, Gold Coast coming along and the instance of probably having minimum draft picks because of our hopeful position on the ladder and therefore weak position in a compromised draft we would be in the position to hold onto some players that might otherwise be stiff to be culled.

Our match committee has done a wonderful job, as it stands, on list management IMO. Especially considering from where we have come from.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:16 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
This year's trading period is going to be chaos for all the clubs, we're not alone. But yes, might be difficult to let some guys go.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Guys that could be in line for the chop are

Bentick
Hartlett
Edwards
Bannister
Anderson
Fisher
oHailpin (ducks head for cover :yikes: )

I know that some of these guys will have a contract, but if there is room in the cap to do it, I think the club would pay out the contract rather than delist a required player.

The thing about the guys that I have picked is that I don't believe that they will have the capacity to get any better than they currently are, which is obviously not good enough to be in our best 22 or even 30 for the better part.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
We're early this year

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:23 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
TruBlueBrad wrote:
We're early this year


QFT. Lucky Judd started the year off well.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:43 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Round 3 hasn't started.

Leave this sort of talk where it belongs, in the post season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:47 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Andain wrote:
Round 3 hasn't started.

Leave this sort of talk where it belongs, in the post season.


Ummm.... the talk began after round one last year! Not having a go at you Andain, just saying there is precedence here!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:16 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:47 am
Posts: 814
Even at the start of the year I think you know which players are staring down the barrel...

The thing is, I can't think of many this year! As Rambo said the club will be looking for as many picks in the draft as possible.

It could be very interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:22 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
We have one thread discussing the merits of who we will drop this week as we have an abundance of riches to choose from and now we have thread discussing who we will flick in 6 months time.

The mind boggles. :roll:

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
Steve_C7 wrote:
Guys that could be in line for the chop are

Bentick
Hartlett
Edwards
Bannister
Anderson
Fisher
oHailpin (ducks head for cover :yikes: )

I know that some of these guys will have a contract, but if there is room in the cap to do it, I think the club would pay out the contract rather than delist a required player.

The thing about the guys that I have picked is that I don't believe that they will have the capacity to get any better than they currently are, which is obviously not good enough to be in our best 22 or even 30 for the better part.


No Names..... :smoking:

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
yibbida wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Guys that could be in line for the chop are

Bentick
Hartlett
Edwards
Bannister
Anderson
Fisher
oHailpin (ducks head for cover :yikes: )

I know that some of these guys will have a contract, but if there is room in the cap to do it, I think the club would pay out the contract rather than delist a required player.

The thing about the guys that I have picked is that I don't believe that they will have the capacity to get any better than they currently are, which is obviously not good enough to be in our best 22 or even 30 for the better part.


No Names..... :smoking:


:lol:

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:02 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Valid discussion.


Instead of all of you looking at this as a shitcan thread, look at it as a testament to the teams
depth...

Of course, anything but supreme optimism get knocked around here at TC. :roll:

Must say though it's hard to select players at the moment with not many games being played,
but there are players that would already be 'on the outer' so to speak...

...the only problem being that you can't mention their names on here without getting your ass kicked...

_________________
Cheap Bike Insurance
Selling Baseball Cards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:50 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
SparkyBlue wrote:
Valid discussion.


Instead of all of you looking at this as a shitcan thread, look at it as a testament to the teams
depth...

Of course, anything but supreme optimism get knocked around here at TC. :roll:

Must say though it's hard to select players at the moment with not many games being played,
but there are players that would already be 'on the outer' so to speak...

...the only problem being that you can't mention their names on here without getting your ass kicked...


Every year someone starts an thread early on musing on which players might get cut at the end of the year. Every year someone replies to that thread saying "it's too early, have you no decency?! Won't someone please think of the children (ie the players)?".

I suppose people think it's unseemly or disloyal or something, apart from the fact that it is obviously a little premature. Maybe it's unusual in world sport - especially for those in Melbourne, we're so close to the club, we can go to training, we chat to the players, we know people who know people...that close connection might make some interpret their relationship with the club a little differently than a Yankees fan might. Fair enough for them I guess.

Life goes on for the players, life goes on for the fans. We go our separate ways. It's a fact of nature, like death, which I suppose we try not to think of too much either! :yikes:

Soooo, who's on the outer then? :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:09 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
I can’t believe people are criticising others for starting or discussing this post. Delisting players is a huge component of our game and draws a lot of interest. Talkback radio discuss it every weekend and before the year even starts. Like it or not players will be delisted at the end of the year. It gives players a motivation to do their best.

I love this discussion because a few years ago a list of 20 players would be listed as potential for being delisted. We are struggling to find 4 or 5 now.

I LOVE IT!!! We are closer to number 17 for this reason.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:13 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 906
Noticed that the only non-injury listed Carlton players not to be in either the Blues or Bullants firsts this week are Tiller and Edwards (plus rookies Hill and Stanton). Tiller was of course picked up with a view to the long term, but Edwards would have to be under pressure to up the ante considerably this year.

I have however noticed that although he is not on the official injury list there is a comment on Bigfooty about Edwards being injured. That is news to me (and let's face it the source IS Bigfooty) but has anyone any idea about any injury to Jake?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:29 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
SparkyBlue wrote:
Valid discussion.


Instead of all of you looking at this as a shitcan thread, look at it as a testament to the teams
depth...

Of course, anything but supreme optimism get knocked around here at TC. :roll:

Must say though it's hard to select players at the moment with not many games being played,
but there are players that would already be 'on the outer' so to speak...

...the only problem being that you can't mention their names on here without getting your ass kicked...


It's the 'bubble syndrome' where people live comfortably in their own fantasy life.

Certain uncomfortable realities can be upsetting to some. Each to their own...


We have a young improving list and it certainly won't be easy managing it at seasons end. That's what I find interesting when following the bullants. Big year for the ants/blues players.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
yibbida wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Guys that could be in line for the chop are

Bentick
Hartlett
Edwards
Bannister
Anderson
Fisher
oHailpin (ducks head for cover :yikes: )

I know that some of these guys will have a contract, but if there is room in the cap to do it, I think the club would pay out the contract rather than delist a required player.

The thing about the guys that I have picked is that I don't believe that they will have the capacity to get any better than they currently are, which is obviously not good enough to be in our best 22 or even 30 for the better part.


No Names..... :smoking:


Why?

Lets face it, these are not guys in their second or third year and have not really progressed from year to year.
They will know their position, that its a make or break year for them, so why shouldn't we name them?

People need to get a grip and not be so precious, turning over the list is what makes good teams, great teams and we need to keep blooding new players that put pressure on the guys playing in the seniors. We have finally got to that point this year and you only have to look at our performances to see the improvement that competitioon for positioin plays in maintaining intensity across the team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Why would you need to elevate players if you can retain them as 'nominated rookies'?

The same rules apply for next year so I'd say four-five to be de-listed, three-four draft picks and one elevation. Of course, any trades would throw that all out of whack. :wink:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Steve_C7 wrote:
yibbida wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Guys that could be in line for the chop are

Bentick
Hartlett
Edwards
Bannister
Anderson
Fisher
oHailpin (ducks head for cover :yikes: )

I know that some of these guys will have a contract, but if there is room in the cap to do it, I think the club would pay out the contract rather than delist a required player.

The thing about the guys that I have picked is that I don't believe that they will have the capacity to get any better than they currently are, which is obviously not good enough to be in our best 22 or even 30 for the better part.


No Names..... :smoking:


Why?

Lets face it, these are not guys in their second or third year and have not really progressed from year to year.
They will know their position, that its a make or break year for them, so why shouldn't we name them?

People need to get a grip and not be so precious, turning over the list is what makes good teams, great teams and we need to keep blooding new players that put pressure on the guys playing in the seniors. We have finally got to that point this year and you only have to look at our performances to see the improvement that competitioon for positioin plays in maintaining intensity across the team.

Why? Because AFL players believe it or not have access to the internet as well. While you'd hope that players would have enough confidence in themselves to shrug things like this off some would undoubtably feel a bit depressed at the idea that three weeks into the AFL season, before the VFL season has even started, Carlton "supporters" are calling for them to be delisted.

We all know which players really need to step up this year anyway so there's no need for this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Traveller86 and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group