TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Fab Four! http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24411 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | bluey95 [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Fab Four! |
I love you, yeah, yeah, yeah... http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 42,00.html |
Author: | exsing [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
"For our young midfield, you look at Heath Hocking, who was a rookie, Andrew Lovett (another rookie). We have an international rookie (in Michael Quinn), to go up against the likes of Bruce Gibbs and Marc Murphy and Chris Judd, who are high picks. It's going to be fabulous for those boys," Knights said. ![]() |
Author: | Gilly34 [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
We'll struggle to keep pace with jets like Watson, Stanton and Hocking ![]() |
Author: | Virgin Blue [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
Gilly34 wrote: We'll struggle to keep pace with jets like Watson, Stanton and Hocking ![]() Yeah, and like maybe we should unleash the speed of Betts, Russell, Grigg, Judd, Robinson and Garlett ![]() |
Author: | bondiblue [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
Virgin Blue wrote: Gilly34 wrote: We'll struggle to keep pace with jets like Watson, Stanton and Hocking ![]() Yeah, and like maybe we should unleash the speed of Betts, Russell, Grigg, Judd, Robinson and Garlett ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | aramari [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. |
Author: | bondiblue [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. He does appear quick...especially in one on one chases...maybe that's TV for you...That's all I've had this year. Can't wait to get to a few LIVE games |
Author: | Gilly34 [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. Good enough for me, who ares how quick he is in sandshoes in a straight line?? ![]() |
Author: | phoenix johnson [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
Knights is an idiot. |
Author: | AGRO [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
phoenix johnson wrote: Knights is an idiot. He shoots he scores and that's the ball game. ![]() |
Author: | Big Kahuna Boot [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
..fab four's a crap name.. ..especially since we've got a good half dozen.. |
Author: | aramari [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
Gilly34 wrote: aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. Good enough for me, who ares how quick he is in sandshoes in a straight line?? ![]() true enough, intensity will cover most of the time, but there are times his lack of pure speed will hurt. |
Author: | nightcrawler [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. He's quick over the first 5-10 like Cooney. |
Author: | dane [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
aramari wrote: Gilly34 wrote: aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. Good enough for me, who ares how quick he is in sandshoes in a straight line?? ![]() true enough, intensity will cover most of the time, but there are times his lack of pure speed will hurt. are you looking to take 'snip'? |
Author: | aramari [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
dane wrote: aramari wrote: Gilly34 wrote: aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. Good enough for me, who ares how quick he is in sandshoes in a straight line?? ![]() true enough, intensity will cover most of the time, but there are times his lack of pure speed will hurt. are you looking to take the 'snip'? Why must everything be black and white to some fans? If someone says that one of our great young players isn't the second coming of Kouta he's a traitor to "the cause"? It's a discussion forum. The free exchange of ideas and all that. It's simple. Someone alluded to Robbo's speed. I've noticed that Robbo lacks straight line speed. I shared that observation. Others noted variously that those vital first few metres are quick, that he seems quick, and that straight line speed isn't always relevant to AFL footy. I conceded that, but maintained that my point had some substance. I could be right, I could be wrong, maybe a bit of both. You're entitled to have a crack at my so-called negativity, but you should consider the value of reasonable discussion, and the negative effects of stifling debate, even in the form of a little dig, a reminder to conform to groupthink. I reckon as long as everyone acts in good faith, banter and debate is what Talking Carlton is all about. If you disagree, cool, tell me i'm wrong and why. Ignore me if you like. Just don't tell me how to think (ie not negatively). Eh, that sounds a bit pompous, in response to a seemingly innocuous comment, but flower it, i suppose I get annoyed easily. ![]() |
Author: | DIAMOTISM [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
Gilly34 wrote: aramari wrote: I think you'll find that, for all Robinson's great qualities, raw pace isn't one of them. His footy knowledge and positive approach make him look quicker than he is. Good enough for me, who ares how quick he is in sandshoes in a straight line?? ![]() QFT - He is quick because he can break the lines. |
Author: | ScottSaunders [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
AGRO wrote: phoenix johnson wrote: Knights is an idiot. He shoots he scores and that's the ball game. ![]() i think thats harsh. i like knights, he is positive and always pumps up his players, which has a role on effect. their supporters believe it and they are oblivous to the bleeding obvious. they are rubbish, but he keeps painting a rosy picture, the supporters accept which all ends up resulting in Essendon* beliving the rubbish and spending years at the bottom being rubbish. "becuase they have some young quick players" knights is awesome ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Steve_C7 [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
ScottSaunders wrote: AGRO wrote: phoenix johnson wrote: Knights is an idiot. He shoots he scores and that's the ball game. ![]() i think thats harsh. i like knights, he is positive and always pumps up his players, which has a role on effect. their supporters believe it and they are oblivous to the bleeding obvious. they are rubbish, but he keeps painting a rosy picture, the supporters accept which all ends up resulting in Essendon* beliving the rubbish and spending years at the bottom being rubbish. "becuase they have some young quick players" knights is awesome ![]() ![]() Are you telling me that they replaced Sheedy with a new Sheedy ![]() ![]() |
Author: | kingkerna [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
Mitch is quick, Armari, that's why he can run down players, not only that he has stamina, he did a gut run against the tigers from the forward pocket to beyond the 50 metre line, got his man too! |
Author: | Pafloyul [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fab Four! |
aramari wrote: ...isn't the second coming of Kouta... That's a little harsh. ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |