Virgin Blue wrote:
Some of you really do overrate Walker.
Deledio is a genuine forward option, whereas Walker hasn't proven he can be reliable in this capacity (granted he has rarely been played in that position, but there's not much we can do about that and at the end of the day fact still remains Deledio can do it and Walker can't).
Deledio finds more of the ball than Walker. In 2008, avg possessions were ... Walker 19.7 vs Deledio 24.5. The latter had over 500 touches in 2008 (538), which is in the territory of very good players. Walker's best annual return is 391 in 2007. Granted Walker had an injury interrupted year in 2008, but I would argue the fact Deledio is more reliable (these days) in terms of getting on the park is another feather in his cap versus Walker.
Also, Deledio as far as I can gauge doesn't turn it over as much as Walker by foot. And I'd also argue that while Tex is an excellent runner, Deledio's turn of pace is better utilised in games. When I watch Richmond, I always see Deledio breaking the lines to good effect, whereas Walks does that less often and with less effect in my view.
Did somebody say Walker takes speccies? As far as I can see he drops them 9 times out of 10.
Look, Walker has had bad luck with injuries, and there's every chance IF he can get on the park in 2009 he might finally emerge a good player. But right now Deledio has stack more runs on the board, and them's the facts folks.
If I was rating the two players out of 100 right now, I would go...
Deledio 82
Walker 68
It's worth noting that Deledio has played 84 games versus Walker 81 games. So in terms of games experience they are on equal footing, and yet one is far more established than the other.
As far as an argument is concerned, you certainly put one up there VB, and made attempts to give your reason for your point of view.
Usually agree with you VB, but I have to say 'generalisations'; you're entitled to.
Doesn't make you right though.
I like Delidio, and believe he's got a bit of 'power play' in him, but I think whilst they both have similar athletic attributes, Walker on points for me because he has a greater engine, has similar pace to burn, but is tougher, stronger and can play tall and small because of his superior leap.
Whilst Walker has been asigned tagging roles, to a HB role, basically defensive apprenticeship served, he has never, ever been unleashed as much as Delidio has been thus far, becauseof our dire need for him to play an attacking defensive role.
I'd play Walker CHB before I play Delidio there.
I'd play Walker CHF before I play Delidio there
I'd play Walker at FF before I'd play Delidio there.
What I'm suggesting is that Walker has more strings to his bow...we have another decade infront of us to see him unleashed.
He looked OK to me in a HF role when he came back from injury last year.