DownUnderChick wrote:
That was great to see.
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| New jumper numbers http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=23524 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | budzy [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New jumper numbers |
http://bigpondvideo.com/CarltonTV/94963 Yarran - 13 Robbo - 12 206 - 11 Tiller - 35 O'Keeffe - 20 |
|
| Author: | The Blueseum [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Number 11....the Ruckman's number? http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php?page=Guernsey+11 From the Blueseum |
|
| Author: | dannyboy [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
it will always be Ragsey's number to me |
|
| Author: | buzzalenko [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
dannyboy wrote: it will always be Ragsey's number to me
that doull bloke was reasonably handy |
|
| Author: | The Blueseum [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Meanwhile... Over at guernsey #35 for Tiller we've only managed 11 games in the decade or so since the great Peter Dean retired...: http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... uernsey+35 All from Blake Campbell! From the Blueseum |
|
| Author: | DownUnderChick [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That was great to see. The life of an AFL footballer would be quite surreal for these guys. |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
DownUnderChick wrote: That was great to see.
|
|
| Author: | DownUnderChick [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimmae wrote: DownUnderChick wrote: That was great to see. What? |
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
yarran has a pot belleez |
|
| Author: | camel [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wow, I thought Yarran would have been a shoo-in for #9 (which is still vacant!). http://carltonfc.com.au/tabid/4311/Defa ... wsid=70766 Awesome to see the Blueseum links on the main site too! 
|
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
DownUnderChick wrote: jimmae wrote: DownUnderChick wrote: That was great to see. What? That was a terrible video, if it wasn't for the jumper presentation I wouldn't have watched the whole thing. |
|
| Author: | molsey [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
camelboy wrote: Wow, I thought Yarran would have been a shoo-in for #9 (which is still vacant!).
http://carltonfc.com.au/tabid/4311/Defa ... wsid=70766 Awesome to see the Blueseum links on the main site too! Fantastic to see - unsolicited from our side too (speaking for myself). I know there's some fans in there at the Club but that Locker Room is a pretty impressive historical resource that demands to be utilised like this. But... Why #9? I like the #11 for a Ruckman, #12 and #13 combination for new players; we'll have #9 and #7 for 2010 picks / trades. |
|
| Author: | Melvey [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimmae wrote: DownUnderChick wrote: jimmae wrote: DownUnderChick wrote: That was great to see. What? That was a terrible video, if it wasn't for the jumper presentation I wouldn't have watched the whole thing. Agree. I couldn't help but cringe |
|
| Author: | jezzarules [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
#9 for Cuz? Box seat ahead of the Tigers. |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
DownUnderChick wrote: That was great to see. The life of an AFL footballer would be quite surreal for these guys. No room for an inside leg measurement joke for Warnock?  They would look better if they weren't wearing trackies and cargo pants. jimmae wrote: That was a terrible video, if it wasn't for the jumper presentation I wouldn't have watched the whole thing.
I've heard that sought of music on other videos, but they're not linked to CFC TV. Robinson is wearing long sleeves in the shot that shows their numbers...But he's wearing short sleeves in the front on shot. 
|
|
| Author: | camel [ Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
molsey wrote: Why #9?
I figured the lowest available number would go to our first round pick. The fact the number is well known for another West Aussie was just a bonus.
|
|
| Author: | TruBlueBrad [ Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
camelboy wrote: molsey wrote: Why #9? I figured the lowest available number would go to our first round pick. The fact the number is well known for another West Aussie was just a bonus. I think its great they've retired the number for a season as a tribute to Jason Saddinton.... |
|
| Author: | murraycray [ Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No. 9 ? I'll draw a long bow here. Chris Johnston's father Alan, wore 9 for the Demons. Saving it for Chris? |
|
| Author: | The Vet [ Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fantastic to see the links to the Blueseum, well done. Can anyone tell me what the requirement was for getting a name on a locker in the early days? was it 50 games? when did it change? McGregor (11) only played 92 games Gardiner (13) only played 90 Duncan (20) only 58. |
|
| Author: | DownUnderChick [ Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimmae wrote: DownUnderChick wrote: jimmae wrote: DownUnderChick wrote: That was great to see. What? That was a terrible video, if it wasn't for the jumper presentation I wouldn't have watched the whole thing. I thought it was good seeing the boys get measured for new suits and then the jumper. The location was a bit cheesy having them stand in the street, but not bad. A hell of lot better than the Filth Membership video.
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|