gerry atric wrote:
Actually woof I think it is lost under a delisting thread in recruitment. It warrants its own thread.
Maybe Caz, apart from pointing out that Woof couldn't find where the brief discussion of Crosisca was buried you could give us a view on his demise and the current policy of appointing coaches with no experience, preferably who have played for Carlton.
Does anyone know whether we scoured all of Australia to find the best possible assistant with the best communication and strategic skills. Having done that and of course coming up fortuitously with Lappo did we do the same to get the best possible development coach with the most apt experience and the best communication and teaching skills? Harves is a great bloke and was a super footballer. Is he the best possible development assistant?
I realise it is not popular to be critical of the club but too many of us (including me) weren't critical over the last 20 years as the club slowly slipped behind the rest of the league and went from the best most innovative club in the early 80s to a bloated dinosaur. We need to get the best of the best. Are we all convinced that this philosophy is behind all our coaching appointments?
No idea.....you seem to be telling the stories around here.
You keep throwing up conjecture and conspiracy theories so I presumed you knew all the answers about what was going on behind the scenes. Judging by what I read you have the vendettas and backstabbing theories down to a fine art.
I only watch 18 year old's run around. Nothing more, nothing less.
I leave the decision making to smart blokes like Swann and Icke. After all a smart bloke like Sir Richard got them on board to do just that.
Perhaps if you write to the club Swanny will provide a dot point list of the decision making process he went though. It couldn't hurt to ask.
Regards Cazzesman
Sorry Woof I just thought it was amusing 1st thing in the morning.
