TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Blueseum: Being in the Top 8 http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21886 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | The Blueseum [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Blueseum: Being in the Top 8 |
http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... 02001-2008 We probably all know that Round 12, 2008 was the first time Carlton had been in the 8 mid-season since 2001. The link highlights our ladder positions in the intervening years. One question though, only one Blue was part of both teams. Who is it? From the Blueseum |
Author: | Deano Supremo [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Gotta be Fev. |
Author: | verbs [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Ratten. |
Author: | Deano Supremo [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Deano Supremo wrote: Gotta be Fev.
ooooh - I was wrong. And I reckon you'll find that two blues were involved in both games. |
Author: | chubbyruss [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Deano Supremo wrote: Gotta be Fev.
Agree |
Author: | CK95 [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Wiggins |
Author: | Big Kahuna Boot [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
..houla's..?.. |
Author: | bluedog [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
CK95 wrote: Wiggins
Pay the man. |
Author: | The Blueseum [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
bluedog wrote: CK95 wrote: Wiggins Pay the man. Spot on, well done CK95. Ratten was in both teams too, just not as a player in the second game. Is this who you meant Deano? From the Blueseum |
Author: | Deano Supremo [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The Blueseum wrote: bluedog wrote: CK95 wrote: Wiggins Pay the man. Spot on, well done CK95. Ratten was in both teams too, just not as a player in the second game. Is this who you meant Deano? From the Blueseum Yup. |
Author: | Jarusa [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
nice graph |
Author: | molsey [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Jarusa wrote: nice graph
It'd probably look better year on year rather than year next to year, but yeah it looks good. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |