TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Blueseum: Being in the Top 8
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21886
Page 1 of 1

Author:  The Blueseum [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Blueseum: Being in the Top 8

http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... 02001-2008

We probably all know that Round 12, 2008 was the first time Carlton had been in the 8 mid-season since 2001. The link highlights our ladder positions in the intervening years.

One question though, only one Blue was part of both teams. Who is it?

From the Blueseum

Author:  Deano Supremo [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

Gotta be Fev.

Author:  verbs [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

Ratten.

Author:  Deano Supremo [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

Deano Supremo wrote:
Gotta be Fev.



ooooh - I was wrong.

And I reckon you'll find that two blues were involved in both games.

Author:  chubbyruss [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

Deano Supremo wrote:
Gotta be Fev.


Agree

Author:  CK95 [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wiggins

Author:  Big Kahuna Boot [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

..houla's..?..

Author:  bluedog [ Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

CK95 wrote:
Wiggins


Pay the man.

Author:  The Blueseum [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:48 pm ]
Post subject: 

bluedog wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Wiggins


Pay the man.


Spot on, well done CK95.

Ratten was in both teams too, just not as a player in the second game. Is this who you meant Deano?

From the Blueseum

Author:  Deano Supremo [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

The Blueseum wrote:
bluedog wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Wiggins


Pay the man.


Spot on, well done CK95.

Ratten was in both teams too, just not as a player in the second game. Is this who you meant Deano?

From the Blueseum


Yup.

Author:  Jarusa [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

nice graph

Author:  molsey [ Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

Jarusa wrote:
nice graph

It'd probably look better year on year rather than year next to year, but yeah it looks good.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/