Umpring all day way crap.
Chamerlain and McLaren
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Slattery bump http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21842 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | Cazzesman [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Slattery bump |
Why was the free paid against Fev for the hit on Slattery? Anyone know? If it was for head high then it was poor call, 1 of many I might add. If Slattery wants to be brave and suicidal at the same time that's not Fev fault. He's entitled to run at the ball and attempt to mark it. The fact that he jumps in the air to mark and collects Slattery coming the other way is surely incidental contact. Regards Cazzesman |
|
| Author: | Donstuie [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think "unrealistic attempt" was the reason the ump gave. Which is interesting, considering Fletcher pushed him into it. |
|
| Author: | macka [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
We seemed to be on the bad end of most of the umpiring today. Even this one against Fev is debatable. |
|
| Author: | DownUnderChick [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It was a moronic decision but given that it was McLaren are you really surpirsed. |
|
| Author: | moshe25 [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
In fact, I thought it should have been a free kick AGAINST Slattery for a "Whitnall shepherd"....... |
|
| Author: | Jez1966 [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Umpring all day way crap. Chamerlain and McLaren
|
|
| Author: | Donstuie [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
moshe25 wrote: In fact, I thought it should have been a free kick AGAINST Slattery for a "Whitnall shepherd".......
Like when Betts was pinged in rd 3 when Fletcher jumped on his head? |
|
| Author: | TruBlueBrad [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
macka wrote: We seemed to be on the bad end of most of the umpiring today. Even this one against Fev is debatable.
Thats to be expected when we're playing Essendon*. |
|
| Author: | shuffagus [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Donstuie wrote: moshe25 wrote: In fact, I thought it should have been a free kick AGAINST Slattery for a "Whitnall shepherd"....... Like when Betts was pinged in rd 3 when Fletcher jumped on his head? does he have anything to worry about for next week...i'd say no, BUT the tribunal don't seem to like fev to much |
|
| Author: | Barnesy [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Slattery bump |
Cazzesman wrote: Why was the free paid against Fev for the hit on Slattery? Anyone know? If it was for head high then it was poor call, 1 of many I might add.
If Slattery wants to be brave and suicidal at the same time that's not Fev fault. He's entitled to run at the ball and attempt to mark it. The fact that he jumps in the air to mark and collects Slattery coming the other way is surely incidental contact. Regards Cazzesman If anyone can figure out why a lot of things happened today it might make things more clearer. 
These umpires all round are all over the shop. They set precedents independant of each other which is interpretated differently by the other one. The players taking on board the first interpretation are then pinged the next time round. 
|
|
| Author: | shuffagus [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Slattery bump |
Barnesy wrote: If anyone can figure out why a lot of things happened today it might make things more clearer.
These umpires all round are all over the shop. They set precedents independant of each other which is interpretated differently by the other one. The players taking on board the first interpretation are then pinged the next time round. i think it was BT on MMM after the game that said the umpires have been very good this year
like to know what games he's been watching, obvs not any carlton matches 
|
|
| Author: | Abaddon [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ridiculous decision. Should have been a free kick to Fevola. But because Slattery was KO'd suddenly its an Essendon* free kick... 
|
|
| Author: | timetodeliver2004 [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Monfries free kick coming after the missed one to O'hAilpin. In the back to Stanton when there was absolutely no forward pressure on his back. Missed holding free kick to Fisher in the goalsquare because Ray couldn't see anything because he had his hands over his eyes to protect them from the sun. Fifty metre penalty to Hille The list goes on.... |
|
| Author: | shuffagus [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
timetodeliver2004 wrote: Monfries free kick coming after the missed one to O'hAilpin.
that one mad me sooooooooo mad
|
|
| Author: | Effes [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jimmy's $20K donation still doing them favours. It didn't cost us the game however. |
|
| Author: | Lace Out [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I can't remember having seen worse umpiring in my life..... I still haven't seen the replay to have another look at a few, but from the ground......Well..................................... I guess what do you expect from a chamo Mclar combo...... |
|
| Author: | shuffagus [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Firearm Fevs wrote: I can't remember having seen worse umpiring in my life.....
the worst i've seen would have definately been against the roos a few years back... houla out on the full, wells goal 10m from the boundary...shocking game
but yea today was pretty much complete BS
|
|
| Author: | Fabulous [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Donstuie wrote: moshe25 wrote: In fact, I thought it should have been a free kick AGAINST Slattery for a "Whitnall shepherd"....... Like when Betts was pinged in rd 3 when Fletcher jumped on his head? Betts got done for tunneling fletcher.... Shocking decision just like todays umpiring What was is 5 free kicks against in there inside 50 |
|
| Author: | ScottSaunders [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
the fact that free kick was paid to Essendon* shows that the umpires arent up for it. it was a reactionary decision based on nothing but emotion becuase the guy was ko'd yet just another example that then umpire with emotion when we are constantly told they are not. the ref was shithouse, but, its not why we lost the game. |
|
| Author: | shuffagus [ Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/video/0,,AFL%20News_8020,00.html this shows a good angle of the fev-slattery incident...fev clearly had eyes for the ball and it was obvs an accident. as for slattery, he wasn't even facing the ball. as for all those cretins on bomberblitz labelling him a 'hero' and being 'courageous', it was a stupid attempt to stop fev. definately no free-kick there. fev did nothing wrong, slattery was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|