Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 2:27 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 11:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
http://www.theage.com.au/realfooty/news ... 07259.html

Quote:
Elliott received his invitation to the function last week and plans to attend despite his continued opposition to Carlton's move. "I'm very disappointed we're leaving," he told The Sunday Age.

"In my own view it's a mistake. I understood the economics very clearly.

"I believe the best alternative would have been for Carlton to play its four interstate games at Optus, against the interstate clubs we get small crowds, and the remaining seven home games at the MCG, that would have got the best financial return.

"That's water under the bridge, but I cannot concede Carlton will be better off financially. They need to get very big crowds every time they go to Telstra."


Quote:
Vivienne Kerr, the club's No. 1 ticket-holder, who signed the petition opposing the move last year, also expressed her reluctant resignation to the cause. "The time to protest was before it was done . . . I think that's past, and of course Telstra's not our home, and it's hard to regard it as such, but whether we like it or not, it is," she said.

"I suppose we all have to move on, regrettably, and I think it was just made impossible for the Carlton Football Club to stay there by the Melbourne City Council, the AFL and everyone else. I've accepted it, and I've got to move on, and I support them in every way I possibly can."

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 12:17 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Carlton v Geelong 2004: 25,037 at Optus Oval.
Carlton v Geelong 2005: 45,758 at Telstra Dome.

That's over 20,000 that disagree with you Jack.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 6:05 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:08 pm
Posts: 2585
Location: Hoppers Crossing
BlueWorld wrote:
Carlton v Geelong 2004: 25,037 at Optus Oval.
Carlton v Geelong 2005: 45,758 at Telstra Dome.

That's over 20,000 that disagree with you Jack.


:?: What a ridiculous comment/comparison.

How many would have been at the G? Which was Jack's proposal. And he's exactly right, we'd need BIG crowds at the Dome to pay for the huge rental fee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 6:35 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
A couple of points on a topic that's been done to death, but probably warrants discussion in the week leading up to the last ever game at Princes Park.

1. Spending the money we'd need to spend to keep Optus Oval at the standard required to host AFL football all for the sake of just FOUR games a season against low-drawing teams (average attendance probably 14-18,000) would be complete lunacy and show absolutely zero business sense.

So I'm not surprised J.E. proposed it.

2. The current board actually preferred the MCG to Telstra Dome in principle, but the AFL pretty much refused to schedule our games at the G. We all know this, so bitching about not being full-time tenants at the G is just a waste of breath. The club cut the best deal it could with limited leverage.

3. The time to go to the MCG was a decade ago, but we decided to spend over $7,000,000 building the Legends Stand, racked up a huge debt and missed the boat. That's our tough shit.

4. None of us know the figures, but I couldn't imagine the break-even figures being much different for the G or TD. Besides, I doubt we'd get too many more than 45,000 at the G for a game against Geelong. And don't forget, when you're playing at the G, you can't count all those MCC members as paying customers either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 6:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:08 pm
Posts: 2585
Location: Hoppers Crossing
JohnM wrote:
Besides, I doubt we'd get too many more than 45,000 at the G for a game against Geelong.


Would've got a LOT more last Friday night I reckon, as the only thing keeping the crowd down last week was the ticketed match situation


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 6:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
It's all about break even point. At TD it was about 32-33K a couple of seasons ago, not sure if it's the same these days. Let's assume for this point in case.

At Optus, the break even point is 11-12K.

So using the crowd figures above;
14K more than break even at TD
14K more than break even at OO

BUT here's the advantage at TD
more commercial exposure, greater FTA coverage, eg Friday nights, better facilities for corporates, members, and supporters.

We're better of at TD, financially so far.

The test will be against lower drawing crowds at this ground and the G. Of course, Carlton's current form won't help with upcoming games at TD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 11:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Wangers wrote:
It's all about break even point. At TD it was about 32-33K a couple of seasons ago, not sure if it's the same these days. Let's assume for this point in case.

At Optus, the break even point is 11-12K.

So using the crowd figures above;
14K more than break even at TD
14K more than break even at OO

BUT here's the advantage at TD
more commercial exposure, greater FTA coverage, eg Friday nights, better facilities for corporates, members, and supporters.

We're better of at TD, financially so far.

The test will be against lower drawing crowds at this ground and the G. Of course, Carlton's current form won't help with upcoming games at TD.


The break even point is bollocks!!!suppose 15k went to a Carlton Freo game at Optus...and 12 , 000 were members..cos now we have 33,000 members and not 25,000 members like under Jack...
How many paying customers would add to the club coffers????

At the Dome we might have crowds of 45k but 25k would be paying customers..(against Hawthorn) cos they want to come along.... and they will pay their money at the door to do so...
Or alternatively.. how many of 22,000 at PP would be paying members and how many members... members have already handed their money over to the club...

so the 11/12k doesnt wash does it????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:10 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
The AFL decide the scheduling. There is only one more Fri night game at the G for the rest of the year: Collingwood-Essendon in Rd 16. All other matches are at TD or interstate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 7:33 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:24 am
Posts: 1217
Location: Melbourne
Wangers wrote:
more commercial exposure, greater FTA coverage, eg Friday nights,


Bloddy hell,

I hope not many more like last friday. That must be the addage any exposure is good exposure, eh?

_________________
"Two roads diverged in a wood,
and I,
I took the one less travelled by,
and that has made all the difference."

Robert Frost


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 1:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1688
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
John is being mooted for "Dancing with the Stars" : The Final indignity.
Oh well at least it's not "Celebrity Circus".
Maybe Australia will love him as much as a certain far right politician after all.
He could dance with Goddard, Wells and Tenace they look like stars.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Braithy, Expat Blue, Google [Bot], sinbagger, windy and 120 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group