VFL tribunal is held over until next week.
because of State game
I guess Ackland & Austin are eligable for selection against the cats
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Austin & Ackland? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21435 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | 1derful [ Thu May 29, 2008 12:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Austin & Ackland? |
Anyone here know the outcome of Mark Austin & Cain Ackland's reports from the weekend match v Sandringham? |
|
| Author: | chubbyruss [ Thu May 29, 2008 12:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
VFL tribunal is held over until next week. because of State game
I guess Ackland & Austin are eligable for selection against the cats |
|
| Author: | Car17on [ Thu May 29, 2008 1:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Can't be a bad thing |
|
| Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Thu May 29, 2008 1:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The VFL as a feeder comp is a farce - byes, delayed tribunals, etc. |
|
| Author: | Kaptain Kouta [ Thu May 29, 2008 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
p(12)terg wrote: Can't be a bad thing
If Ackland is actually available, is that a good thing? |
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Thu May 29, 2008 2:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Kaptain Kouta wrote: p(12)terg wrote: Can't be a bad thing If Ackland is actually available, is that a good thing? I have heard that Ackland is getting four .............................. ever. 
|
|
| Author: | Adam Chatfield [ Thu May 29, 2008 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Did Ackland actually do anything (ie. or did the umpires just object to him being so inept? |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Thu May 29, 2008 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Adam Chatfield wrote: Did Ackland actually do anything (ie. or did the umpires just object to him being so inept?
"Bringing the ruck into disrepute" |
|
| Author: | sinbagger [ Thu May 29, 2008 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Adam Chatfield wrote: Did Ackland actually do anything (ie. or did the umpires just object to him being so inept?
Apparently took mark of the round in the goalsquare, landed, took a couple of quick steps and proceeded to smash the ball into the face of the nearest opposition player, I guess we're not the only ones frustrated with his form. 
I can't imaging he's feeling very good about himself right now if he ever reads the newspaper, blogs, forums or listens to any over the fence comments. |
|
| Author: | jake_h03 [ Thu May 29, 2008 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
bluehammer wrote: Adam Chatfield wrote: Did Ackland actually do anything (ie. or did the umpires just object to him being so inept? "Bringing the ruck into disrepute" BAHAHAA lmao That's gold. Ackland is truely a nutsack |
|
| Author: | Adam Chatfield [ Thu May 29, 2008 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
sinbagger wrote: Adam Chatfield wrote: Did Ackland actually do anything (ie. or did the umpires just object to him being so inept? Apparently took mark of the round in the goalsquare, landed, took a couple of quick steps and proceeded to smash the ball into the face of the nearest opposition player, I guess we're not the only ones frustrated with his form. I can't imaging he's feeling very good about himself right now if he ever reads the newspaper, blogs, forums or listens to any over the fence comments. Or feels very good if he listens to anyone at all speaks about him and football in the same context. |
|
| Author: | shuffagus [ Thu May 29, 2008 6:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
bluehammer wrote: Adam Chatfield wrote: Did Ackland actually do anything (ie. or did the umpires just object to him being so inept? "Bringing the ruck into disrepute"
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|