TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
How good was Judd! http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20594 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | vangipuss [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:30 am ] |
Post subject: | How good was Judd! |
Did anyone see judd loosing it at Nick Stevens after he gave away that 50 on On The Couch last night? I felt like doing the right thing after seeing Judd come down on him. |
Author: | bluehammer [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:38 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Judd > Chairman of Selectors |
Author: | TheGame [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
That was a bullshit 50 though, especially after Hudgeton went unpenalized despite jumping up and down crying after every free he gave away. |
Author: | cj69 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Good! |
Author: | vangipuss [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
it was a bullshit free in the first place. |
Author: | Bookie [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Was excellent would love to see him have a chat to Brendan at times in matches as well. I think Fev actually respects Juddy and that's a short list the 'Fev respect' list I'd suggest. |
Author: | Kaptain Kouta [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Bookie wrote: Was excellent would love to see him have a chat to Brendan at times in matches as well. I think Fev actually respects Juddy and that's a short list the 'Fev respect' list I'd suggest.
Unfortunately, most of the time the "Fev Respect List" reads 1) Fevvy 2) Daylight 3) JUDD 4) Anyone else. |
Author: | The Duke [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:02 am ] |
Post subject: | |
It was a BS free kick in the first place. The fifty was an extra dollop of turd on top. I don't blame NS for cracking the sh1ts - he was the only one trying to get the footy. |
Author: | TruBlueBrad [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:10 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Then when he got the footy he layed on top of it and made no attempt to clear it out. The free kickwas warranted and so was the 50m penalty. The umpiring department warned all week there would be a zero tolerence policy. The fact they didn't enforce it on Hudgton doesn't excuse Stevens. Our problem is leadership. We're missing that band of players from 24-30 and most of the ones we do have exhibit little leadership. |
Author: | Gilly34 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
TheGame wrote: That was a bullshit 50 though, especially after Hudgeton went unpenalized despite jumping up and down crying after every free he gave away.
Spot on, St Kilda bitched and moaned about every free kick paid against them....I almost threw something at the tv when that 50m penalty was paid. Edit: TBB does have a point though.....some leadership and discipline wouldn't go astray. |
Author: | vangipuss [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
yeah but how good was judd tho ![]() |
Author: | Virgin Blue [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The free was there. Everybody knows, if you lay on the ball and make no effort to get it out, you are GAWN ! |
Author: | Gilly34 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
vangipuss wrote: yeah but how good was judd tho
![]() I think getting Judd should do amazing things for the playing group.....it is time for some of the boys to take a leaf from his book and actually do as he does, instead of just admiring it. |
Author: | Sydney Blue [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Gilly34 wrote: vangipuss wrote: yeah but how good was judd tho ![]() I think getting Judd should do amazing things for the playing group.....it is time for some of the boys to take a leaf from his book and actually do as he does, instead of just admiring it. the negative forces still over power the positive - We need more than Judd - Either that ditch the negatives |
Author: | TheGame [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
TruBlueBrad wrote: The fact they didn't enforce it on Hudgton doesn't excuse Stevens.
Doesn't excuse the umpire's decision either. |
Author: | Blues87 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I blame Kevin Bartlett. |
Author: | verbs [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
It was a bullshit free kick. Stevens made all the play to get to the ball and then his opponent who was lagging behind held onto him and the ball. It was definitely NOT holding the ball. The umpire reckons Stevens "didn't do enough" to get the ball out, I reckon his opponent "didn't do enough" to get NEAR the ball, let alone EARN a free kick. And then Stevens said, quite rightly, "What was that for?" and a 50m penalty was issued. That is the absolute height of stupidity by the umpire. |
Author: | timetodeliver2004 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The free kick may or may not have been there, but the 50m definitely wasn't there. Also, what they may not have shown was after the goal was kicked, Juddy actually went over to Stevo and gave him a bit of a tap and told him to move on, keep his head up....but of course, much better to just show half the story and show him giving him a spray. |
Author: | DownUnderChick [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
What did Judd say or do to Stevo after he gave the 50m away? |
Author: | Bookie [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 10:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Juddy had a quiet word and told him to let it go (I assume from from the footage). FWIW I thought it was over the shoulder, however Stevo did too and didn't play the whistle. The 50 was a joke considering Mad Max arm waving etc. Really was a costly time in the game too, we just back got within a goal and coins IIRC. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |