In the shades of last night's loss I've given good thought to our club and how we are faring.
I've come across quite a few home truths - some good, some bad - but they are all pretty close to the mark I reckon... keep in mind that my views are not just reflective of Round 1.
***Depth, obviously, is a concern. Our best 18 (last nights squad + Kruezer, Fisher, Walker - IMO)
100% fit and playing to their potential has the ability to knock off any team in the competition... whether Ratten's game plan will accommodate this is yet to be seen. Lose any handful of these players though, and massive deficiencies in the backline, forward, or the ruck are going to show. The only area of depth in our team in is the midfield.
***Some skill levels are just inadequate, whilst some clangers are unavoidable. But remember we have the
youngest playing list in the competition. Hawthorn held this mantle 3-4 years ago, and they are finally starting to play decent football.
***Carlton, at the start of Round 1 has 33,000 members - except for the 2007 season (35,431), this is more signed up prior to the start of the home and away season than any FINISHING TOTAL of any other season.
***Underdone: Stevens (injury/match practice), Hadley (match practice), Judd (injury - and was still damaging!). A lot of the kids it seems fail to run out 4 quarters - and maybe some questions should be asked as to why? Fatigue takes it's took, especially on younger players - in the latter parts of the season... but why can't they run out a game from the start?!
***Our coach has experience - on the other side of the fence.
Ratts' coaching career is only 10 games old (I think), and he - like the team, is still trying to find his feet it seems. Us Carlton faithful may not be as patient anymore - due to our last 5 years and who can blame us? - but sometimes we need to remember this. The coach is learning with the players, and
as long as we see changes on the field, as long as we see
small, continual improvements in the players, and as long as we see
adaptive game plans being executed - we should persevere.
***Particularly last night, I watched three players provide any sort of run or drive from half back to half forward - Simpson, Murphy and in parts, Judd. They were the only players that could find space and create a fluid passage of play to the forward line,
many of the others found themselves flat footed or chipping sideways and waiting for the opposition to cross over before kicking to a contest anyway. This definitely needs to change.
***I think we can all say that, despite his deficiencies in the ruck - that
Cameron Cloke will always contribute to the team and provide a contest where he can. A classic example of a player making the most of the abilities he has and playing to his strengths (strong body one on one marking, and covering the ground well for mine). Other players that - whether you think they are good players or not - that play to their strengths are Betts, O'hAilpin, and Jamison. (who perhaps played his best match yet last night...)
***We need Fisher! If not Fish, then another tall forward of a marking option.
Fev will be double-teamed throughout the entire season without another tall marking option up forward, and while Fisher is the obvious choice - Hartlett, Kruezer, O'hAilpin or even Cloke could potentially fill this role - with varying success.
***
Waite has already shown in the Dogs and Tigers matches that the half back flank needs him. His telescopic arms, big engine and courage are finally going to be utilised in the most effective manner, IMO. Waite on Brown? Who knows how that would go, or whether he is better suited to a flank or a floating position - but our backline looks a truckload better with him there...
***
We will win at least one of the next three matches (against St. Kilda, Essendon* or Collingwood). At LEAST one! Our underdone players will be fresher for last night's run, Fisher should be back - Ratt's will tinker with the line-up and send any deadwood to the Magoos. In trying to think of last night's loss in a positive fashion (I was spitting chips last night!) - I'm thinking of it as an aberration, and looking at our Rd. 14 match against Richmond as a potential 8 goal drubbing...!
***Did you see the likes of Kouta and Lappin make multiple clangers on a weekly basis? No. Why? Because they were
well drilled, experienced players, who had played more games between the two of them than just under half of Carlton's playing list.
***Is it just me, or do we have
some ingrained issue with playing half a game?! As I mentioned earlier, our fitness seems to be a concern - but is it really fitness?
Is it choking when we're playing decent football due to a losing mentality developed over the past 5 years?! Whatever it is, it needs to be rectified. A slump from our team in our quarter could gift a team like Geelong with an 8 goal effort... if it happens in the first quarter we are looking at a very long match. (Unless it's Essendon*

)
Well that's all I've got, I'd like to think I'm pretty close to the mark with my comments but this is my opinion alone... some good, some bad.
The good is that we have the structure, a team with skill (but no experience), two of the best players in the comp in Fev and Judd and a hunger to win - backed by an army of devoted supporters.
The bad is that the Carlton resurgence, although started - is still in it's infancy. The winning mentality need to be established, the team needs to gel and adapt to a new coach's game plan and we need that little bit of arrogance back.
***2008 will be a very, very interesting year.
