wtsoapm wrote
Quote:
If we can develop a ruckman to at least that level in the next couple of years it's going to make life a lot easier for our midfield.
Quote:
...one thing we have to remember with Kreuzer, Hampson, and Aisake is Bananaby didn't debut until 23 years of age, the same age Dean Cox really made an impact at AFL level.
Quote:
So as frustrating as it could be watching our ruckman develop, anyone bagging them over the next few years need only be reminded of just how hard it is to crack it with the bigboys when you're still growing into your bodies whilst trying to adjust to the pace of the game.
Firstly, I think we have midfielders who can extract more from opposition ruckmen than previous: Judd, Stevens, Carrazzo, Gibbs and Murphy. They are good extractors when need be with pace and ability to read the ball.
Secondly, do we have the tacklers to halt opposition midfielders?: Bentick, Judd, Stevens, Carrazzo, Walker and Murphy (maybe Hadlee). Body strength and closing speed. High tackle count.
How do our ruckmen shape against Cox, Sandilands , Charman, Brodie, Lade, King...?
Aisake and Hampson have the height and leap on their side in centre bounces to at least mullify the ball. Kreuzer has the height, but is inexperienced and slight against the big boys.
Cloke, Jacobs (Porter like) and maybe Aisake have the strength for the general rucking requiring body on body rucking.
So, generally speaking, we have Hampson and Aisake who can take the centre bounces and run their opposition around, hopefully tiring the heavier opposition ruckmen. Cloke is the only big bloke in the seniors with the weight to compete against big ruckmen around the ground, but is very short, especially against Sandilands , Cox and Lade. Cloke's tactic in the few games showed Cloke's is most effective with a collision brand of rucking; but I don't think that'll do his shoulder any good.
Conclusion: We're still stuffed in the ruck till the kids grow! Ackland is not the answer.
We have no choice imo but to put up with young skinny developing ruckmen to take the reigns of ruck in 2008, and we'll have to wait for another preseason for Aisake to really bulk up, and at least 2-3 more preseasons for Hampson and Kreuzer to get to a competitive size; that's 2010-2011.
In the meantime we have to throw the challenge of athleticism against opposition ruckmen in 2008. As long as they are more competitive than Ackland and produce better results than the shorter Cloke, they should be given a go. We must be mindful that they will get tired in the second half playing in the ruck.
Question is, should we keep the second nominated rookie spot open for Jacobs to step up to throw a fresh and bigger body into the ruck especially during the second half of the season? Alternatively we may have to resort to shorter 195-196 cm ruckmen in Ackland and Cloke when the kits need a break.
High altitude training fix the problem? 5% better?