TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

blues miss out on millions
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19355		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Melvey [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  blues miss out on millions
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/ ... 42,00.html
Author:  grrofunger [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
squawk squawk !
Author:  dane [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:46 pm ]
Post subject: 
:garthp: back to your box
Author:  Buzza4 [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
:garthp: old news :garthp:
Author:  jezzarules [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
:melvey:
Author:  TruBlueBrad [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
If you read the article you'll find it's not all old news, so its perfectly legitimate to post a link to it now.
Author:  Andain [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 3:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
TruBlueBrad wrote:
If you read the article you'll find it's not all old news, so its perfectly legitimate to post a link to it now.


I don't see how a legal rangle that doesn't involve the CFC whatsoever, except for the fact that one of the participants was a player for Carlton years ago, bears any relevence to Carlton.

The only Carlton stuff in that article is old old news. They have some extremely dodgy sub-editors over at the Herald Sun.
Author:  TruBlueBrad [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Andain wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
If you read the article you'll find it's not all old news, so its perfectly legitimate to post a link to it now.


I don't see how a legal rangle that doesn't involve the CFC whatsoever, except for the fact that one of the participants was a player for Carlton years ago, bears any relevence to Carlton.

The only Carlton stuff in that article is old old news. They have some extremely dodgy sub-editors over at the Herald Sun.


The part about us not being involved in any legal action is trivial, but new.

I find it of interest to us a club to see why the deal fell through and the ramifications of it.

I agree the title of the article is poor.
Author:  Jarusa [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:15 pm ]
Post subject: 
It is a perfectly good article from the standpoint of the newspaper. There are supporters of 15 other clubs out there that enjoy reading anything even remotely negative about Carlton.
Author:  grrofunger [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:21 pm ]
Post subject: 
@#$%&! the newspaper
Author:  Donstuie [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:35 pm ]
Post subject: 
Missing out on the pub deal = Old news

The people involved fighting over the dollars = Nothing involving Carlton

Ergo, story = Irrelevant to today
Author:  Melvey [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
daft punk baby yeah!!!!
Author:  Pat's Fitztrick [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Carlton's pub deal about to get nasty...
Remember the deal that was going to bring us financial salvation?

Well, it aint!

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/ ... 42,00.html
Author:  The Vet [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:20 am ]
Post subject: 
stay tuned. This is not dead.
Author:  DownUnderChick [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:32 am ]
Post subject: 
The Vet wrote:
stay tuned. This is not dead.


You guys are going to be the death of me.
Author:  darknavy [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:14 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Ironically the boss of T.J. Board, Terry Board, played 41 games and kicked 43 goals with the Blues between 1965 and '68.



:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: COINCIDENCE not IRONY :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Author:  Jarusa [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:32 am ]
Post subject: 
darknavy wrote:
Quote:
Ironically the boss of T.J. Board, Terry Board, played 41 games and kicked 43 goals with the Blues between 1965 and '68.



:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: COINCIDENCE not IRONY :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


It's annoying for me too, and quite ironic, much like rain on your wedding day.
Author:  jezzarules [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:40 am ]
Post subject: 
darknavy wrote:
Quote:
Ironically the boss of T.J. Board, Terry Board, played 41 games and kicked 43 goals with the Blues between 1965 and '68.



:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: COINCIDENCE not IRONY :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Must have meant American irony.
Author:  tommi [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:47 am ]
Post subject: 
Image.......?


kindest regards tommi
Author:  darknavy [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:46 am ]
Post subject: 
“It's a traffic jam when you're already late” is BAD LUCK unless perhaps you are on your way to a meeting about traffic congestion, then it is ironic
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/