I can't say for sure about Judd, but I can say that we definitely would have walked away with our 3rd consecutive spoon
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| If we would have come last: http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19073 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Barack Obama [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | If we would have come last: |
Had Richmond beaten Stkilda in Round 22, we would have come last, and had picks 1, 2 and PSD pick 1. If that happened, do you think we would have just taken Judd in the PSD and kept Kennedy, and picked up Kreuzer AND Cotchin? |
|
| Author: | TenOutOfTen [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I can't say for sure about Judd, but I can say that we definitely would have walked away with our 3rd consecutive spoon
|
|
| Author: | wasthesonofapreacherman [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
If my aunty had balls...would she be my uncle??????? |
|
| Author: | bluehotel [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
spoon equals pain |
|
| Author: | sideshow bob [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
no chance of that at all Richmond would still have been in the box seat according to bartlett |
|
| Author: | hystericego [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
part of me wanted carlton to beat Essendon* , then i was glad we lost , same same here , who wants the spoon . |
|
| Author: | Lace Out [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
And suffer a "Three pete" in the spoon department, no thanks. I'm super happy the way it has all panned out. 
|
|
| Author: | tommi [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah i know.......... spew we didn't come last........we would've got Judd then.............! kindest regards tommi |
|
| Author: | keogh [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Watch the last quarter of that game if u want 2 see a team tank a game. Tigers worst tank ever Tanking Terry |
|
| Author: | Fabulous [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think we are forgetting we still got the number 1 pick without finishing last. We screwed Richmond hard on that one. Who cares about the number 1 PSD pick. We got Stevens when we had PSD pick 2 I have faith in Richmond stuffing it up by picking up another "Knobel" and keeping us honest 
|
|
| Author: | Barnesy [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
We would have given them Pick 2. Judd would not have wanted West Coast to get nothing. And we would have kept kennedy. |
|
| Author: | bluehotel [ Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
pick two is still giving them cotchin |
|
| Author: | hustla [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Would of, could of, should of.. shit happens, be happy with what we got. |
|
| Author: | Ads [ Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Finishing bottom and getting the no.1 pick in the PSD and screwing the Eagles by taking Judd for nothing aswell as Kruezer and Cotchin in the draft? While at the same time screwing our chances of any team wanting to deal with again in the future with a big player if we had of screwed the Eagles? I prefer it the way it turned out 
|
|
| Author: | buggermeblue [ Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Barnesy wrote: We would have given them Pick 2.
Judd would not have wanted West Coast to get nothing. And we would have kept kennedy. de Still think we would've had to part with #2 AND Kennedy. Judd wouldn't have wanted to walk via PSD. Probably would've landed another good player with #1 in PSD but then we wouldn't have enjoyed a summer of fun hangin' shit on Bitchmond supporters for copping the spoon despite our tanking! Judd and Kreuzer will do just fine thank you very much.
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|